<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Well... might be a bug. I in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilzation-on-5ghz-with-no-client-connected/m-p/2977613#M161641</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Well... might be a bug. I know that some whom ran that code has had issue. 8.2.100.0 was fine for us and we are running 8.2.110.0 on a few 5520's in SSO but we don't have the 1800 AP's.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Open a TAC case and let them investigate while you test or look at upgrading which they might tell you anyways.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-Scott&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*** Please rate helpful posts ***&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 10:19:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-10-06T10:19:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>High Channel Utilzation on 5Ghz with no Client connected</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilzation-on-5ghz-with-no-client-connected/m-p/2977608#M161636</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am just wondering, no client is connected on 5GHz and yet there is a very high channel utilization with 0% interference. Do you know how is that possible? no problem on 2.4GHz. Im using Cisco WLC 5520 and firmware version 8.2. Is this some kind of bug?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My troubleshooting procedure on that is restart the AP and the channel utilization returns to normal. Please see attached photo.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the help,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;JE&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 12:55:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilzation-on-5ghz-with-no-client-connected/m-p/2977608#M161636</guid>
      <dc:creator>janvelgado_16</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T12:55:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sure looks like a bug. We</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilzation-on-5ghz-with-no-client-connected/m-p/2977609#M161637</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sure looks like a bug. We have controllers on v8.2.110.0 and v8.2.130.0 and don't see that issue. &amp;nbsp;I have seen high channel on v8.0.111 code but when there were more than 10 clients which was a bug in that version. &amp;nbsp;If you look at the show ap auto-RF 802.11a &amp;lt;ap name&amp;gt;, do you see high utilization also. &amp;nbsp;If so, then either open up a TAC case or try a different code version to compare.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-Scott&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*** Please rate helpful posts ***&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 09:36:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilzation-on-5ghz-with-no-client-connected/m-p/2977609#M161637</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-06T09:36:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Scott,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilzation-on-5ghz-with-no-client-connected/m-p/2977610#M161638</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Scott,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for that. Can you look at these, here is the output of the command and another AP on high Utilization. Should I open a TAC Case?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;(Cisco Controller) &amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;(Cisco Controller) &amp;gt;show ap auto-rf 802.11a T1-00-001&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Number Of Slots.................................. 2 &lt;BR /&gt;AP Name.......................................... T1-00-001&lt;BR /&gt;MAC Address...................................... dc:ce:c1:2c:36:70&lt;BR /&gt; Slot ID........................................ 1&lt;BR /&gt; Radio Type..................................... RADIO_TYPE_80211a&lt;BR /&gt; Sub-band Type.................................. All&lt;BR /&gt; Noise Information&lt;BR /&gt; Noise Profile................................ FAILED&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 36................................... 17 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 40................................... 17 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 44................................... 17 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 48................................... 17 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 52................................... 14 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 56................................... 14 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 60................................... 14 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 64................................... 14 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 100.................................. 14 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 104.................................. 14 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 108.................................. 14 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 112.................................. 14 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 116.................................. 14 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 132.................................. 13 dBm&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;--More-- or (q)uit&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 136.................................. 13 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 140.................................. 13 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 149.................................. 13 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 153.................................. 13 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 157.................................. -89 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 161.................................. 13 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 165.................................. 13 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Interference Information&lt;BR /&gt; Interference Profile......................... PASSED&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 36................................... -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 40................................... -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 44................................... -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 48................................... -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 52................................... -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 56................................... -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 60................................... -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 64................................... -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 100.................................. -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 104.................................. -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 108.................................. -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 112.................................. -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 116.................................. -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 132.................................. -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;--More-- or (q)uit&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 136.................................. -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 140.................................. -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 149.................................. -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 153.................................. -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 157.................................. -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 161.................................. -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 165.................................. -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;BR /&gt; Rogue Histogram (20/40/80/160)&lt;BR /&gt; ............................................. &lt;BR /&gt; Channel 36................................... 0/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 40................................... 0/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 44................................... 0/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 48................................... 0/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 52................................... 0/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 56................................... 0/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 60................................... 0/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 64................................... 0/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 100.................................. 0/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 104.................................. 0/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 108.................................. 0/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 112.................................. 0/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 116.................................. 0/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 132.................................. 0/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;--More-- or (q)uit&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 136.................................. 0/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 140.................................. 0/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 149.................................. 0/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 153.................................. 0/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 157.................................. 0/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 161.................................. 0/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 165.................................. 0/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;BR /&gt; Load Information&lt;BR /&gt; Load Profile................................. FAILED&lt;BR /&gt; Receive Utilization.......................... 0 %&lt;BR /&gt; Transmit Utilization......................... 97 %&lt;BR /&gt; Channel Utilization.......................... 97 %&lt;BR /&gt; Attached Clients............................. 0 clients&lt;BR /&gt; Coverage Information&lt;BR /&gt; Coverage Profile............................. PASSED&lt;BR /&gt; Failed Clients............................... 0 clients&lt;BR /&gt; Client Signal Strengths&lt;BR /&gt; RSSI -100 dbm................................ 0 clients&lt;BR /&gt; RSSI -92 dbm................................ 0 clients&lt;BR /&gt; RSSI -84 dbm................................ 0 clients&lt;BR /&gt; RSSI -76 dbm................................ 0 clients&lt;BR /&gt; RSSI -68 dbm................................ 0 clients&lt;BR /&gt; RSSI -60 dbm................................ 0 clients&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;--More-- or (q)uit&lt;BR /&gt; RSSI -52 dbm................................ 0 clients&lt;BR /&gt; Client Signal To Noise Ratios&lt;BR /&gt; SNR 0 dB.................................. 0 clients&lt;BR /&gt; SNR 5 dB.................................. 0 clients&lt;BR /&gt; SNR 10 dB.................................. 0 clients&lt;BR /&gt; SNR 15 dB.................................. 0 clients&lt;BR /&gt; SNR 20 dB.................................. 0 clients&lt;BR /&gt; SNR 25 dB.................................. 0 clients&lt;BR /&gt; SNR 30 dB.................................. 0 clients&lt;BR /&gt; SNR 35 dB.................................. 0 clients&lt;BR /&gt; SNR 40 dB.................................. 0 clients&lt;BR /&gt; SNR 45 dB.................................. 0 clients&lt;BR /&gt; Nearby APs&lt;BR /&gt; Radar Information&lt;BR /&gt; Channel Assignment Information&lt;BR /&gt; Current Channel Average Energy............... 32 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Previous Channel Average Energy.............. 32 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Channel Change Count......................... 1104&lt;BR /&gt; Last Channel Change Time..................... Thu Oct 6 09:40:36 2016&lt;BR /&gt; Recommended Best Channel..................... 157&lt;BR /&gt; RF Parameter Recommendations&lt;BR /&gt; Power Level.................................. 1&lt;BR /&gt; RTS/CTS Threshold............................ 2347&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;--More-- or (q)uit&lt;BR /&gt; Fragmentation Threshold...................... 2346&lt;BR /&gt; Antenna Pattern.............................. 0&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Persistent Interference Devices&lt;BR /&gt; Class Type Channel DC (%%) RSSI (dBm) Last Update Time&lt;BR /&gt; ------------------------- ------- ------ ---------- ------------------------&lt;BR /&gt; All third party trademarks are the property of their respective owners.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;(Cisco Controller) &amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;JE&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 09:51:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilzation-on-5ghz-with-no-client-connected/m-p/2977610#M161638</guid>
      <dc:creator>janvelgado_16</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-06T09:51:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I would open a TAC case. I</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilzation-on-5ghz-with-no-client-connected/m-p/2977611#M161639</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would open a TAC case. I noticed that you are using an 1800 AP and it can be a bug on that. Again, I'm running probably a different code that you but also I am using a 3602, 3702 and 3802 and don't see that issue on the code versions I mentioned. What code are you running and what controller?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-Scott&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;***Please rate helpful posts ***&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 10:06:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilzation-on-5ghz-with-no-client-connected/m-p/2977611#M161639</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-06T10:06:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Scott,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilzation-on-5ghz-with-no-client-connected/m-p/2977612#M161640</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Scott,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We are running a 5520 WLC (redundant) with version&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 14pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"&gt;8.2.111.0. is this an AP bug or WLC bug? will open a TAC Case.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 10:11:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilzation-on-5ghz-with-no-client-connected/m-p/2977612#M161640</guid>
      <dc:creator>janvelgado_16</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-06T10:11:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Well... might be a bug. I</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilzation-on-5ghz-with-no-client-connected/m-p/2977613#M161641</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Well... might be a bug. I know that some whom ran that code has had issue. 8.2.100.0 was fine for us and we are running 8.2.110.0 on a few 5520's in SSO but we don't have the 1800 AP's.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Open a TAC case and let them investigate while you test or look at upgrading which they might tell you anyways.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-Scott&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*** Please rate helpful posts ***&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 10:19:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilzation-on-5ghz-with-no-client-connected/m-p/2977613#M161641</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-06T10:19:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks Scott, I will let you</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilzation-on-5ghz-with-no-client-connected/m-p/2977614#M161642</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Scott, I will let you know once we have further investigated this issue with TAC.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;JE&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 10:25:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilzation-on-5ghz-with-no-client-connected/m-p/2977614#M161642</guid>
      <dc:creator>janvelgado_16</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-06T10:25:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Channel 157..................</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilzation-on-5ghz-with-no-client-connected/m-p/2977615#M161643</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Channel 157.................................. -89 dBm&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: line-through;"&gt;This is pretty high. &amp;nbsp;What happens if you disable Channel 157?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 10:58:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilzation-on-5ghz-with-no-client-connected/m-p/2977615#M161643</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-06T10:58:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sorry Leo, but what does that</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilzation-on-5ghz-with-no-client-connected/m-p/2977616#M161644</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sorry Leo, but what does that value means? All other&amp;nbsp;values for Noise profile are + dBm.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 10:58:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilzation-on-5ghz-with-no-client-connected/m-p/2977616#M161644</guid>
      <dc:creator>janvelgado_16</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-06T10:58:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Channel 36...................</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilzation-on-5ghz-with-no-client-connected/m-p/2977617#M161645</link>
      <description>&lt;PRE class="prettyprint"&gt;Channel 36................................... 17 dBm&lt;BR /&gt;Channel 40................................... 17 dBm&lt;BR /&gt;Channel 44................................... 17 dBm&lt;BR /&gt;Channel 48................................... 17 dBm&lt;BR /&gt;Channel 52................................... 14 dBm&lt;BR /&gt;Channel 56................................... 14 dBm&lt;BR /&gt;Channel 60................................... 14 dBm&lt;BR /&gt;Channel 64................................... 14 dBm&lt;BR /&gt;Channel 100.................................. 14 dBm&lt;BR /&gt;Channel 104.................................. 14 dBm&lt;BR /&gt;Channel 108.................................. 14 dBm&lt;BR /&gt;Channel 112.................................. 14 dBm&lt;BR /&gt;Channel 116.................................. 14 dBm&lt;BR /&gt;Channel 132.................................. 13 dBm&lt;BR /&gt;Channel 136.................................. 13 dBm&lt;BR /&gt;Channel 140.................................. 13 dBm&lt;BR /&gt;Channel 149.................................. 13 dBm&lt;BR /&gt;Channel 153.................................. 13 dBm&lt;BR /&gt;Channel 161.................................. 13 dBm&lt;BR /&gt;Channel 165.................................. 13 dBm&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Duhhhh ... I made the wrong assumption. &amp;nbsp;These values are the very high. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm with Scott. &amp;nbsp;This could be a bug. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 11:16:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilzation-on-5ghz-with-no-client-connected/m-p/2977617#M161645</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-06T11:16:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi All,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilzation-on-5ghz-with-no-client-connected/m-p/2977618#M161646</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As confirmed with TAC, it is indeed a bug issue. See link:&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt; font-family: 'Calibri','sans-serif'; color: #1f497d;"&gt;&lt;A href="https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuy97681/"&gt;https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuy97681/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Recommended action is to upgrade the WLC to the following 8.2.130.0.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless/wireless-lan-controller-software/200046-TAC-Recommended-AireOS.html?cachemode=refresh#anc8&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you all,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;JE&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2016 06:49:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilzation-on-5ghz-with-no-client-connected/m-p/2977618#M161646</guid>
      <dc:creator>janvelgado_16</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-11T06:49:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks for the update!</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilzation-on-5ghz-with-no-client-connected/m-p/2977619#M161647</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the update!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-Scott&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*** Please rate helpful posts ***&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2016 13:29:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilzation-on-5ghz-with-no-client-connected/m-p/2977619#M161647</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-11T13:29:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Recommended action is to</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilzation-on-5ghz-with-no-client-connected/m-p/2977620#M161648</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Recommended action is to upgrade the WLC to the following 8.2.130.0.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks for the update. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This doesn't make sense. &amp;nbsp;None at all. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Did TAC provided this recommendation, upgrade to 8.2.130.0? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If they did then I'd request the case to be escalated. &amp;nbsp;According to the Release Notes of 8.2.130.0, Bug ID&amp;nbsp;CSCuy97681 isn't even listed as either OPEN or Resolved Caveats. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The details of the bug also identifies the bug to be found in 8.2.100.0 but the controller is running 8.2.111.0. &amp;nbsp;Another thing, the bug details also states "No release planned to fix this bug". &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Upgrading to 8.2.130.0 may not fix the issue but TAC can provide you with an engineering version which may include a fix to this bug.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2016 21:25:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilzation-on-5ghz-with-no-client-connected/m-p/2977620#M161648</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-11T21:25:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks Leo, Salamat ng marami</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilzation-on-5ghz-with-no-client-connected/m-p/2977621#M161649</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Leo, Salamat ng marami&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P dir="ltr"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Indeed TAC has recommended that, herewith below is his email:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P dir="ltr"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;"After checking on my I found that we had a bug with same symptoms (now it’s closed since the issue is not reproducible on the latest 8.2 release)&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuy97681/"&gt;https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuy97681/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;So can you please upgrade your WLC to the following recommended release 8.2.130.0: &lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless/wireless-lan-controller-software/200046-TAC-Recommended-AireOS.html?cachemode=refresh#anc8"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless/wireless-lan-controller-software/200046-TAC-Recommended-AireOS.html?cachemode=refresh#anc8&lt;/A&gt;"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;I have asked TAC your reply on this thread.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you so much,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;JE&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2016 01:55:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilzation-on-5ghz-with-no-client-connected/m-p/2977621#M161649</guid>
      <dc:creator>janvelgado_16</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-12T01:55:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High Channel Utilzation on 5Ghz with no Client connected</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilzation-on-5ghz-with-no-client-connected/m-p/4699234#M246852</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm having similar issue. We have 320 AP's in different buildings, and running the following WLC:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco IOS XE Software, Version 17.03.05a&lt;BR /&gt;Cisco IOS Software [Amsterdam], C9800 Software (C9800_IOSXE-K9), Version 17.3.5a, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DNAC is giving us P3's almost everyday on around 35 AP's.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is an example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="GC013_0-1665062551507.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/164195iA1912B2F10D28463/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="GC013_0-1665062551507.png" alt="GC013_0-1665062551507.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyone have this issue with this WLC version?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance for any tips and advice.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2022 13:23:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilzation-on-5ghz-with-no-client-connected/m-p/4699234#M246852</guid>
      <dc:creator>GC013</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-06T13:23:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High Channel Utilzation on 5Ghz with no Client connected</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilzation-on-5ghz-with-no-client-connected/m-p/4725916#M248576</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I stumbled upon your post on accident,&amp;nbsp;we have basically the same issue on wlc9800. We have gone through several fw versions starting from 16.X and now are at 17.6.4. I'm pretty confident we had the same alert appearing in DNA so I wouldn't say it's a bug that will be fixed with fw upgrade. Would also like to hear some ideas how to improve this or at least find the root cause.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 13:53:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilzation-on-5ghz-with-no-client-connected/m-p/4725916#M248576</guid>
      <dc:creator>sroic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-22T13:53:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High Channel Utilzation on 5Ghz with no Client connected</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilzation-on-5ghz-with-no-client-connected/m-p/4725967#M248588</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Have you opened a TAC case?&amp;nbsp; You can also search the bug tool to see if there are any other support cases that matches what you are seeing.&amp;nbsp; The hard part is how clean the air is during that time and using another tool to help compare.&amp;nbsp; I have seen that a long time ago on AireOS and with a NetAlly tool, we were able to see a difference in the spectrum from what the controller was showing and it was a bug. Open a TAC case as that would be the fastest way to get an answer.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 15:00:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilzation-on-5ghz-with-no-client-connected/m-p/4725967#M248588</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-22T15:00:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

