<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic I have upgrade site with 400 in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5520-ha-code-upgrade-question/m-p/2955686#M162570</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have upgrade site with 400 some AP's and everything came back within 10 minutes. The dhcp bad address is only with Microsoft dhcp so you are good. &amp;nbsp;I would have console connection to each so you can at least monitor and have a good understanding of what happens for future reference.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-Scott&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*** Please rate helpful posts ***&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 19:59:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-01-04T19:59:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>5520 HA Code Upgrade Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5520-ha-code-upgrade-question/m-p/2955681#M162565</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all, I'm looking to do my first upgrade on my 5520 HA pair. &amp;nbsp;The pair in question is for a hospital campus so, as you can imagine, uptime is crucial. &amp;nbsp;The upgrade will take place at night, but I still need to minimize the downtime. &amp;nbsp;My question is if I can perform a restart (soft reload) or do I need to actually do a reset (hard reload)? &amp;nbsp;The documentation says to schedule a reset, but in my experience it takes quite a bit of time just to get the server bounced to even start the WLC software loading.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;TIA!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Ryan&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 13:18:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5520-ha-code-upgrade-question/m-p/2955681#M162565</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ryan Curry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T13:18:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>So the documentation says to</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5520-ha-code-upgrade-question/m-p/2955682#M162566</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So the documentation says to schedule a reset, it means a reset not a restart as you cannot schedule a restart.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 17:37:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5520-ha-code-upgrade-question/m-p/2955682#M162566</guid>
      <dc:creator>M. Wisely</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-04T17:37:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thank you for your input, but</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5520-ha-code-upgrade-question/m-p/2955683#M162567</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your input, but the reason it says to schedule is to avoid having a version mismatch between controllers. &amp;nbsp;My question is if anyone has performed a restart in the field and run into any issues.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 17:42:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5520-ha-code-upgrade-question/m-p/2955683#M162567</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ryan Curry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-04T17:42:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I have done this on many</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5520-ha-code-upgrade-question/m-p/2955684#M162568</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have done this on many sites and with the 5520 it takes about 10min before everything comes back up. &amp;nbsp;You will do a reset, but I would issue the reset system both in &amp;lt;time&amp;gt; and specify 5 min or 10 min. &amp;nbsp;Also make sure you pre download the image to all AP's so reduce the downtime. &amp;nbsp;One thing I would do is if you run a Microsoft DHCP server is to monitor the AP dhcp scope and verify that there are no bad addresses when you initiate the upgrade.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-Scott&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*** Please rate helpful posts ***&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 18:30:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5520-ha-code-upgrade-question/m-p/2955684#M162568</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-04T18:30:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks Scott, I've already</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5520-ha-code-upgrade-question/m-p/2955685#M162569</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Scott, I've already got it all set with the APs pre-downloaded and images swapped. &amp;nbsp;I've also gone through and issued a reset system both at &amp;lt;time&amp;gt; for my 1:00 am upgrade schedule. &amp;nbsp;Again, since I've not done an upgrade in production with this configuration, I don't know what to expect from a downtime. &amp;nbsp;10 minutes is acceptable, 25 - 30 minutes (which is what I was worried it might take) is a completely different situation.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As for DHCP, we use the BlueCat IPM which has always been reliable.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks again!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 19:48:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5520-ha-code-upgrade-question/m-p/2955685#M162569</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ryan Curry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-04T19:48:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I have upgrade site with 400</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5520-ha-code-upgrade-question/m-p/2955686#M162570</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have upgrade site with 400 some AP's and everything came back within 10 minutes. The dhcp bad address is only with Microsoft dhcp so you are good. &amp;nbsp;I would have console connection to each so you can at least monitor and have a good understanding of what happens for future reference.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-Scott&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*** Please rate helpful posts ***&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 19:59:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5520-ha-code-upgrade-question/m-p/2955686#M162570</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-04T19:59:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Just a quick follow up, not</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5520-ha-code-upgrade-question/m-p/2955687#M162571</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Just a quick follow up, not that you need the verification Scott, but you were 100% correct. &amp;nbsp;The downtime was less than 10 minutes and all came back as expected - thanks for the validation!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 14:39:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5520-ha-code-upgrade-question/m-p/2955687#M162571</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ryan Curry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-16T14:39:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks for the follow up.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5520-ha-code-upgrade-question/m-p/2955688#M162573</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the follow up. This helps others also when they have concerns about the time it takes for an upgrade.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-Scott&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*** Please rate helpful posts ***&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 17:06:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5520-ha-code-upgrade-question/m-p/2955688#M162573</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-16T17:06:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: I have done this on many</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5520-ha-code-upgrade-question/m-p/3221135#M162575</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Question on the windows dhcp,&amp;nbsp; we have windows dhcp server2008 and have the bad address issue, in reading I found this command(&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;config ap dhcp release-override enable&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;{&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;cisco-ap&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;|&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;all&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;})&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;as a work around and was wondering how well it works.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Dean&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2017 17:46:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/5520-ha-code-upgrade-question/m-p/3221135#M162575</guid>
      <dc:creator>UWStoutTelecom</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-22T17:46:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

