<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Yes it is supported. in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/support-for-lag-on-two-5520-s-in-ha/m-p/2872892#M162591</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes it is supported.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have 8540 HA with LAG &amp;amp; no problem of doing that.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Rasika&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 20:05:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rasika Nayanajith</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-05-04T20:05:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Support for LAG on two 5520's in HA</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/support-for-lag-on-two-5520-s-in-ha/m-p/2872891#M162590</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have two 5520's running 8.2.107 in a HA pair but I am only using one ap management interface from each WLC.&amp;nbsp; Is LAG supported with HA? Are there any caveats?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 12:00:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/support-for-lag-on-two-5520-s-in-ha/m-p/2872891#M162590</guid>
      <dc:creator>DAVID</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T12:00:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yes it is supported.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/support-for-lag-on-two-5520-s-in-ha/m-p/2872892#M162591</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes it is supported.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have 8540 HA with LAG &amp;amp; no problem of doing that.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Rasika&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 20:05:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/support-for-lag-on-two-5520-s-in-ha/m-p/2872892#M162591</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rasika Nayanajith</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-05-04T20:05:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Then why every time that I</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/support-for-lag-on-two-5520-s-in-ha/m-p/2872893#M162592</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Then why every time that I tried to enable LAG did the WLC tell me to disable HA? Can I have the two ap-management interfaces on each WLC go back to four ports on the same switch in the same port-channel group?&amp;nbsp; My suspicion is that one WLC will be port-channel to one switch and the other WLC will be port-channel to the second switch but I'm not certain as that I only have one 3850 switch to work with.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 20:23:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/support-for-lag-on-two-5520-s-in-ha/m-p/2872893#M162592</guid>
      <dc:creator>DAVID</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-05-04T20:23:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Because It's mandatory</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/support-for-lag-on-two-5520-s-in-ha/m-p/2872894#M162593</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Because It's mandatory requirement, but doesn't mean it's not supported&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cisco put a a restriction on enable/disable LAG in HA. you should disable HA first then enable or disable LAG, then reconfigure HA again&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 19:52:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/support-for-lag-on-two-5520-s-in-ha/m-p/2872894#M162593</guid>
      <dc:creator>mabdelaal85</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-13T19:52:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>There is a setting in the</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/support-for-lag-on-two-5520-s-in-ha/m-p/2872895#M162594</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There is a setting in the controller general configuration says "LAG Mode on next reboot" Enable/Disable. Will this configuration make me be able to avoid split the SSO when enable LAG to the cluster?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;//Per&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 10:09:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/support-for-lag-on-two-5520-s-in-ha/m-p/2872895#M162594</guid>
      <dc:creator>Per.hallen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-07T10:09:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LAG is dependent if you want</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/support-for-lag-on-two-5520-s-in-ha/m-p/2872896#M162595</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;LAG is dependent if you want to bundle the ports or when disabled allows you to specify a primary port and backup port. SSO if a feature that is independent of LAG being enabled or disabled. &amp;nbsp;The redundancy port on the controller is used for SSO.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-Scott&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*** Please rate helpful posts ***&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 10:28:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/support-for-lag-on-two-5520-s-in-ha/m-p/2872896#M162595</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-07T10:28:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thank you Scott, so by that i</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/support-for-lag-on-two-5520-s-in-ha/m-p/2872897#M162596</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you Scott, so by that i would be able to:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. Issue the "&lt;SPAN&gt;LAG Mode on next reboot" on the primary (active) WLC of the cluster.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2. Reboot the cluster.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3. Verify LAG configuration on both primary (active) and secondary (hot-standby) WLC.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That means i doesn't necessarily has to break up the SSO before i enable lag (?)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;//Per&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 11:17:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/support-for-lag-on-two-5520-s-in-ha/m-p/2872897#M162596</guid>
      <dc:creator>Per.hallen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-07T11:17:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What you should do is once</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/support-for-lag-on-two-5520-s-in-ha/m-p/2872898#M162597</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What you should do is once you enable/disable lag, save the config and then force a failover to the backup and then verify that the backup has the same configuration. &amp;nbsp;I haven't tested this to see if LAG changes sync because typicality I would have that set prior to enabling SSO.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-Scott&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*** Please rate helpful posts ***&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 12:11:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/support-for-lag-on-two-5520-s-in-ha/m-p/2872898#M162597</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-07T12:11:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Just found this:</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/support-for-lag-on-two-5520-s-in-ha/m-p/2872899#M162598</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Just found this:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Restrictions on High Availability&lt;BR /&gt;We recommend that you do not disable LAG physical ports when HA SSO is enabled.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;To enable or disable LAG, you must disable HA.&lt;BR /&gt;Note &lt;BR /&gt;If LAG is disabled and both primary and backup ports are connected to the management interface and if the primary port becomes nonoperational, a switchover might occur because the default gateway is not reachable and backup port failover might exceed 12 seconds.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So you are better off breaking SSO and performing the change.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/8-0/configuration-guide/b_cg80/b_cg80_chapter_010100001.html&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-Scott&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*** Please rate helpful posts ***&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 12:15:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/support-for-lag-on-two-5520-s-in-ha/m-p/2872899#M162598</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-07T12:15:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks, i broke up the</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/support-for-lag-on-two-5520-s-in-ha/m-p/2872900#M162599</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks, i broke up the cluster before i enabled LAG on both controllers. Worked fine.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;To keep in mind:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;All WLANs gets disabled when the LAG i enabled.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;All the WLANs gets mapped to the management interface. I thought this would only happend to the 7.6. I had the 8.0.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;//Per&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2016 07:39:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/support-for-lag-on-two-5520-s-in-ha/m-p/2872900#M162599</guid>
      <dc:creator>Per.hallen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-08T07:39:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

