<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Let's start with some basics. in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wap-issue/m-p/2939786#M162638</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Let's start with some basics.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1) make sure that each of the WAPs are in L2 bridging mode for Meraki roaming to work.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2) I'm assuming that you have the same SSID(s) on each WAP. Is this true?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3) Design the system with a 15-20% signal overlap.&amp;nbsp; You can use the internal Meraki tooks to check but you will have to have all the radios on the same channel temporarily.&amp;nbsp; A better solution would be to invest in a wireless survey tool to verify coverage.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;4) Make sure that neighboring WAPs are on different channels to avoid co-channel interference.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;5) Are all of the Meraki WAPs in the same network?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;--Patrick&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2016 20:54:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>hypnotoad</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-10-14T20:54:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>WAP Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wap-issue/m-p/2939785#M162637</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Guys,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;we are controlling our ap's using cisco meraki we have 3 current AP's right now but we add a new AP named as &lt;STRONG&gt;AP3&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;model M34.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Now we are experiencing intermittent connection on user side after adding the new AP. I think the new model interference the other old model but we configure lower transmit power so that it will not be preferred by the user near &lt;STRONG&gt;AP1 and AP2.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What user did they just reconnect then it will work but after sometime issue persist. Now we already turn off the new &lt;STRONG&gt;AP3.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/servlet/JiveServlet/showImage/2-583048-323466/WAP.PNG" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;IMG alt="WAP.PNG" class="jive-image image-1" height="628" src="https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/servlet/JiveServlet/downloadImage/2-583048-323466/WAP.PNG" width="532" /&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What is the best design for these scenario or what would be the possible issue when using this design and how we can prevent it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can we set a prefer AP for users on meraki?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope you could add some tip or ideas for this. Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 12:58:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wap-issue/m-p/2939785#M162637</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lost &amp; Found</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T12:58:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Let's start with some basics.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wap-issue/m-p/2939786#M162638</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Let's start with some basics.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1) make sure that each of the WAPs are in L2 bridging mode for Meraki roaming to work.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2) I'm assuming that you have the same SSID(s) on each WAP. Is this true?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3) Design the system with a 15-20% signal overlap.&amp;nbsp; You can use the internal Meraki tooks to check but you will have to have all the radios on the same channel temporarily.&amp;nbsp; A better solution would be to invest in a wireless survey tool to verify coverage.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;4) Make sure that neighboring WAPs are on different channels to avoid co-channel interference.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;5) Are all of the Meraki WAPs in the same network?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;--Patrick&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2016 20:54:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wap-issue/m-p/2939786#M162638</guid>
      <dc:creator>hypnotoad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-14T20:54:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi @hypnotoad,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wap-issue/m-p/2939787#M162639</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="fullname"&gt;&lt;SPAN rel="sioc:has_creator"&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;@&lt;A href="https://supportforums.cisco.com/users/hypnotoad" title="View user profile." class="username" lang="" about="/users/hypnotoad" typeof="sioc:UserAccount" property="foaf:name" datatype=""&gt;hypnotoad&lt;/A&gt;,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your response. Please see the below answers.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. We have 9 SSIDs 2 configured as L3 Roaming and the rest is Local LAN.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. Yes. That correct we hace same ssids on each WAP.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3. What do you mean by same channel. Here's or channel configuration as of now.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;4. Channel COnfiguration&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;AP&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. Auto&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. 11 (Auto)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3.&amp;nbsp; 6 (Auto)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;4. 1 (Auto)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;5. Yes. Same network.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2016 04:15:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wap-issue/m-p/2939787#M162639</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lost &amp; Found</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-15T04:15:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

