<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Site Surveys in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/site-surveys/m-p/105957#M163295</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi  , &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; It depend upon how much bandwidth is required for your application . &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; As you move away from AP , throughput decreases from 11 to 5.5 to 2 to 1 . &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; Now Signal Stregth is DIFFERENT THAN singnal quality . Good Signal Strength does not mean  always good singal quality . &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; What you should look for is SIGNAL QUAILITY . Multipath reduces signal quaility . &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; I would day keep more than 30% signal quality . There is no guide line for deciding this threshold . It is upto your desing that how much overlap you want between two adjacent cell . &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Roaming of users not only depend on signal strength and quality it is also depend on # of hope the backbone is away and other factors ....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope this helps ....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2002 07:15:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ndoshi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-11-22T07:15:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Site Surveys</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/site-surveys/m-p/105956#M163294</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am conducting some inside site surveys, I have a lot of documentation on doing a survey and have good equipment but one question I have is what should be the minimum signal strength or quality that I want to look for?  For example I am thinking that a signal strength of 10 percent is as low as I want to go and would consider that the edge of the range for that access point.  I am just wondering if there is a suggested limit or rule to go by.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your help in advance.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 15:21:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/site-surveys/m-p/105956#M163294</guid>
      <dc:creator>vosm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T15:21:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Site Surveys</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/site-surveys/m-p/105957#M163295</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi  , &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; It depend upon how much bandwidth is required for your application . &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; As you move away from AP , throughput decreases from 11 to 5.5 to 2 to 1 . &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; Now Signal Stregth is DIFFERENT THAN singnal quality . Good Signal Strength does not mean  always good singal quality . &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; What you should look for is SIGNAL QUAILITY . Multipath reduces signal quaility . &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; I would day keep more than 30% signal quality . There is no guide line for deciding this threshold . It is upto your desing that how much overlap you want between two adjacent cell . &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Roaming of users not only depend on signal strength and quality it is also depend on # of hope the backbone is away and other factors ....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope this helps ....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2002 07:15:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/site-surveys/m-p/105957#M163295</guid>
      <dc:creator>ndoshi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-11-22T07:15:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Site Surveys</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/site-surveys/m-p/105958#M163296</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The tool I am using it is easier to see strength than quality.  I have always been putting more emphasis on quality because you are right that quality is more important than strength.  We have a Fluke Optiview with the wireless option and it does a good job showing strength and throughput.  The big point you pointed out is application requirements which not only is going to be hard to measure, we have a lot of different users with different requirements.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the info and stimulating some more thought on this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2002 14:14:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/site-surveys/m-p/105958#M163296</guid>
      <dc:creator>vosm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-11-22T14:14:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Site Surveys</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/site-surveys/m-p/105959#M163297</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our rule of thumb is a minimum Mb connection. As an example, we will guarantee at least 2 Mb at any location that is covered by wireless. This works well for us. Keep in mind that the type of device you are using makes a big difference too. We use mostly hand held units for our warehouse operation. The radio is not as strong as a laptop with a wireless NIC. With this in mind, we survey with the hand held unit.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2002 02:22:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/site-surveys/m-p/105959#M163297</guid>
      <dc:creator>thomas.tucker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-11-25T02:22:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Site Surveys</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/site-surveys/m-p/105960#M163298</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please find the attached document.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 07:52:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/site-surveys/m-p/105960#M163298</guid>
      <dc:creator>manjeets</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-03T07:52:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

