<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Adjacent Channel interference in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/adjacent-channel-interference/m-p/2363292#M164157</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you able to 'see' this when looking at the channel from Cisco Spectrum Expert?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 15:00:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>u297863AG</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-12-19T15:00:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Adjacent Channel interference</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/adjacent-channel-interference/m-p/2363289#M164154</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I read about 'adjacent channel interference'. Wanted to confirm with the experiened folks out there if there could really be a problem with 'adjacent channel' interference where the APs are on non overlapping channels but are placed too close together? If so, shouldnt RRM resolve?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 08:26:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/adjacent-channel-interference/m-p/2363289#M164154</guid>
      <dc:creator>u297863AG</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T08:26:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Adjacent Channel interference</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/adjacent-channel-interference/m-p/2363290#M164155</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;RRM will help, but it really can't 'fix' a bad design.&amp;nbsp; If you are too dense, the WLC may not be able to lower power enough to stop the interference.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH, &lt;BR /&gt;Steve &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ &lt;BR /&gt;Please remember to rate useful posts, and mark questions as answered&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2013 19:56:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/adjacent-channel-interference/m-p/2363290#M164155</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen Rodriguez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-16T19:56:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Adjacent Channel interference</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/adjacent-channel-interference/m-p/2363291#M164156</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;with 5ghz, it should not be an issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;with 2.4ghz, if ap power is least then it should not affect. when ap on max power, only side bands get affected due to overlap.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:27:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/adjacent-channel-interference/m-p/2363291#M164156</guid>
      <dc:creator>Saravanan Lakshmanan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-19T12:27:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Adjacent Channel interference</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/adjacent-channel-interference/m-p/2363292#M164157</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you able to 'see' this when looking at the channel from Cisco Spectrum Expert?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 15:00:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/adjacent-channel-interference/m-p/2363292#M164157</guid>
      <dc:creator>u297863AG</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-19T15:00:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

