<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Clients disassociated simultanously in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/clients-disassociated-simultanously/m-p/3180064#M164303</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, it is a hospital. The Controllers are WISM2 with OS 8.0.132.&lt;BR /&gt;We've only found clients on APs 3502 with this issue. Probably there are others as well but as&lt;BR /&gt;the majority of APs is of type 3502 it is hard to say.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I knew someone would ask about RRM. We decided to disable RRM in some areas.&lt;BR /&gt;To be honest, areas without RRM work much better with spectralink phones.&lt;BR /&gt;About a year ago we set up the WLC regarding Spectralinks Guide for Cisco WLAN.&lt;BR /&gt;This setup was unusable. Phones did not roam smoothly, we had one-way audio, Phones were frozen and had to be rebooted ... After several Software Updates on Phones and disabling RRM in some areas&lt;BR /&gt;we could eliminate nearly all issues.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just to clarify: RRM is not disabled. Only Channels and Power levels have been fixed in some areas. A site survey showed, that power levels with RRM were rather low in some areas.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 11:54:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>tsgruu2000</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-09-05T11:54:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Clients disassociated simultanously</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/clients-disassociated-simultanously/m-p/3179646#M164299</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have seen lots of disassociations with Reason:Unspecified ReasonCode:1 in a Customers WLC. It seems that several clients on the same Access Point are disassociated in the same millisecond. This happens on several Access Points.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Most clients do not care about this but there are Spectralink Phones which have to associate to another Access Point in this case. I wonder what causes these disassociations. RRM is disabled.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could Rogue Detection cause such disassociations? I have no idea...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug 30 &lt;STRONG&gt;16:02:04.675&lt;/STRONG&gt;: %APF-3-DISASSOC_TRAP: apf_80211.c:15616 Client Disassociated: MACAddress:28:6a:ba:a0:7a:61 Base Radio MAC:&lt;STRONG&gt;cc:d5:39:e3:fe:00&lt;/STRONG&gt; Slot:0 User Name:unknown Ip Address:10.3.130.146 Reason:Unspecified ReasonCode:1&lt;BR /&gt;Aug 30 &lt;STRONG&gt;16:02:04.675&lt;/STRONG&gt;: %APF-3-DISASSOC_TRAP: apf_80211.c:15616 Client Disassociated: MACAddress:60:f1:89:72:8d:ec Base Radio MAC:&lt;STRONG&gt;cc:d5:39:e3:fe:00&lt;/STRONG&gt; Slot:0 User Name:unknown Ip Address:10.33.142.205 Reason:Unspecified ReasonCode:1&lt;BR /&gt;Aug 30 &lt;STRONG&gt;16:02:04.675&lt;/STRONG&gt;: %APF-3-DISASSOC_TRAP: apf_80211.c:15616 Client Disassociated: MACAddress:40:b8:37:b0:0b:00 Base Radio MAC:&lt;STRONG&gt;cc:d5:39:e3:fe:00&lt;/STRONG&gt; Slot:0 User Name:unknown Ip Address:10.33.137.210 Reason:Unspecified ReasonCode:1&lt;BR /&gt;Aug 30 &lt;STRONG&gt;16:02:04.676&lt;/STRONG&gt;: %APF-3-DISASSOC_TRAP: apf_80211.c:15616 Client Disassociated: MACAddress:6c:19:c0:b5:54:3e Base Radio MAC:&lt;STRONG&gt;cc:d5:39:e3:fe:00&lt;/STRONG&gt; Slot:0 User Name:unknown Ip Address:10.33.139.226 Reason:Unspecified ReasonCode:1&lt;BR /&gt;Aug 30 &lt;STRONG&gt;16:02:04.676&lt;/STRONG&gt;: %APF-3-DISASSOC_TRAP: apf_80211.c:15616 Client Disassociated: MACAddress:d0:87:e2:42:f9:8e Base Radio MAC:&lt;STRONG&gt;cc:d5:39:e3:fe:00&lt;/STRONG&gt; Slot:0 User Name:unknown Ip Address:10.33.137.86 Reason:Unspecified ReasonCode:1&lt;BR /&gt;Aug 30 &lt;STRONG&gt;16:02:04.676&lt;/STRONG&gt;: %APF-3-DISASSOC_TRAP: apf_80211.c:15616 Client Disassociated: MACAddress:e8:50:8b:b4:83:56 Base Radio MAC:&lt;STRONG&gt;cc:d5:39:e3:fe:00&lt;/STRONG&gt; Slot:0 User Name:228014421069891@scm-eapsim.ch Ip Address:10.33.128.218 Reason:Unspecified ReasonCode:1&lt;BR /&gt;Aug 30 16:02:04.676: %APF-3-DISASSOC_TRAP: apf_80211.c:15616 Client Disassociated: MACAddress:00:61:71:6e:90:8c Base Radio MAC:cc:d5:39:e3:fe:00 Slot:0 User Name:unknown Ip Address:10.33.140.25 Reason:Unspecified ReasonCode:1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Urs&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 14:36:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/clients-disassociated-simultanously/m-p/3179646#M164299</guid>
      <dc:creator>tsgruu2000</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T14:36:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Clients disassociated simultanously</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/clients-disassociated-simultanously/m-p/3179672#M164300</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to take a wireless packet capture on a channel that AP operate while this is happening ? That will tell us what's going on.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Do you have any spectrum analyzer to see how is RF looks like in this environment ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Rasika&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 10:15:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/clients-disassociated-simultanously/m-p/3179672#M164300</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rasika Nayanajith</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-04T10:15:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Clients disassociated simultanously</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/clients-disassociated-simultanously/m-p/3179709#M164301</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Rasika,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am going to ask the Customer to do a capture using Netmon. Unfortunately these issues are not predictable. They occur on different Access Points&amp;nbsp;from time to time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there something other than RRM that could cause an Access Point to&amp;nbsp;disassociate its clients?&lt;BR /&gt;RRM is disabled.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many Thanks for your advice!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Urs&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 12:19:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/clients-disassociated-simultanously/m-p/3179709#M164301</guid>
      <dc:creator>tsgruu2000</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-04T12:19:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Clients disassociated simultanously</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/clients-disassociated-simultanously/m-p/3179739#M164302</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Can you tell us more about your setup? &amp;nbsp;I'm assuming it's a hospital since you are using Spectralink phones? &amp;nbsp;What controller model, code and AP's? &amp;nbsp;You have other sites that have this issue also running the same equipment and code? &amp;nbsp;I'm just curious as to why there was a decision to disable RRM? &amp;nbsp;I have setup a bunch of hospitals and never disabled RRM.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-Scott&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*** Please rate helpful posts ***&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 13:55:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/clients-disassociated-simultanously/m-p/3179739#M164302</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-04T13:55:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Clients disassociated simultanously</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/clients-disassociated-simultanously/m-p/3180064#M164303</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, it is a hospital. The Controllers are WISM2 with OS 8.0.132.&lt;BR /&gt;We've only found clients on APs 3502 with this issue. Probably there are others as well but as&lt;BR /&gt;the majority of APs is of type 3502 it is hard to say.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I knew someone would ask about RRM. We decided to disable RRM in some areas.&lt;BR /&gt;To be honest, areas without RRM work much better with spectralink phones.&lt;BR /&gt;About a year ago we set up the WLC regarding Spectralinks Guide for Cisco WLAN.&lt;BR /&gt;This setup was unusable. Phones did not roam smoothly, we had one-way audio, Phones were frozen and had to be rebooted ... After several Software Updates on Phones and disabling RRM in some areas&lt;BR /&gt;we could eliminate nearly all issues.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just to clarify: RRM is not disabled. Only Channels and Power levels have been fixed in some areas. A site survey showed, that power levels with RRM were rather low in some areas.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 11:54:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/clients-disassociated-simultanously/m-p/3180064#M164303</guid>
      <dc:creator>tsgruu2000</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-05T11:54:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

