<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Improvements for roaming in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/improvements-for-roaming/m-p/262011#M166349</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have some Intel clients running on a Cisco 1200 backbone that would roam only after loosing the connection with the current AP. I know the Intel driver is not flawless but what can I do to get the best from my AP's at least? That in terms of roaming. The APs (1230s running 12.2(13)JA3) are configured with &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Open Auth&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WEP encrypt mandatory&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no guest-mode &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1,2,5.5,11MB enabled.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tried both the config for best throughput and best coverage, no difference. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The area is covered well by the installed APs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any idea is appreciated,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ME&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 16:43:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>melisei</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-04T16:43:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Improvements for roaming</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/improvements-for-roaming/m-p/262011#M166349</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have some Intel clients running on a Cisco 1200 backbone that would roam only after loosing the connection with the current AP. I know the Intel driver is not flawless but what can I do to get the best from my AP's at least? That in terms of roaming. The APs (1230s running 12.2(13)JA3) are configured with &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Open Auth&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WEP encrypt mandatory&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no guest-mode &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1,2,5.5,11MB enabled.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tried both the config for best throughput and best coverage, no difference. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The area is covered well by the installed APs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any idea is appreciated,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ME&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 16:43:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/improvements-for-roaming/m-p/262011#M166349</guid>
      <dc:creator>melisei</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T16:43:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Improvements for roaming</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/improvements-for-roaming/m-p/262012#M166350</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you try with new IOS image (122-15 maybe)? I had some problems with 122-13 image.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good Luck,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Srdja&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2004 12:46:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/improvements-for-roaming/m-p/262012#M166350</guid>
      <dc:creator>srdja</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-06-23T12:46:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Improvements for roaming</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/improvements-for-roaming/m-p/262013#M166351</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I read the release notes for it and there is nothing specific abut improvements in the new build. I have't tried it so far.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Marius&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:53:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/improvements-for-roaming/m-p/262013#M166351</guid>
      <dc:creator>melisei</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-06-24T18:53:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

