<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Force channel assignment - Radar problems in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/force-channel-assignment-radar-problems/m-p/3782120#M167854</link>
    <description>&lt;P style="text-align: left;"&gt;Thanks for providing the output.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="text-align: left;"&gt;I see that you're using:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE class="bp-text bp-text-plain hljs"&gt;&lt;CODE class="txt"&gt;Configured Country............................... ES  - Spain

&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P style="text-align: left;"&gt;which falls under the ETSI regulatory domain and explains why you're unable to see the other channels as in North America does.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="text-align: left;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Reg Dom.JPG" style="width: 869px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/28071i00AA383478CD5C64/image-dimensions/869x714?v=v2" width="869" height="714" role="button" title="Reg Dom.JPG" alt="Reg Dom.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 14:44:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>superego</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-01-17T14:44:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Force channel assignment - Radar problems</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/force-channel-assignment-radar-problems/m-p/3781137#M167848</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;First of all thanks for your help.I have a simple scenario with two RAPS and one MAP but I am suffering random disassociations from the MAP Access Point and the clients connected to this AP accordingly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Picture3.JPG" style="width: 845px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/27966iC71B3EAF2B39CC70/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Picture3.JPG" alt="Picture3.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Checking at logs I notice that there is plenty of radar interruptions so I decided to disable DFS in order to avoid that interriptions using "config mesh full-sector-dfs disable" command.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately the problem persist and I decided to force channels with the objective to avoid problematic channels&amp;nbsp; selecting only channels 36 to 48 in DCA section, but I still can see AP connected to forbidden channels (136 and 100).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Picture1.JPG" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/27964iE2AA9E85E064097E/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Picture1.JPG" alt="Picture1.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Configuring manually the AP channels only channels from 100 to 140 are available:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Picture2.JPG" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/27965iBBD11534255FBBBE/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Picture2.JPG" alt="Picture2.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am sure im missing something and i will really appreciate if can someone kindly put some light.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks in advance&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 16:42:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/force-channel-assignment-radar-problems/m-p/3781137#M167848</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alfonsoj</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T16:42:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Force channel assignment - Radar problems</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/force-channel-assignment-radar-problems/m-p/3781438#M167849</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What code are you using?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Provide output using CLI:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;show sysinfo&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;show mesh config&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;show advanced 802.11a channel&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can omit confidential stuff from the output.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 19:46:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/force-channel-assignment-radar-problems/m-p/3781438#M167849</guid>
      <dc:creator>superego</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-16T19:46:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Force channel assignment - Radar problems</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/force-channel-assignment-radar-problems/m-p/3781457#M167850</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I see the issue you have is that on Wireless&amp;gt;802.11a&amp;gt;RRM&amp;gt;DCA&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The only thing you have is 36,44,48,52.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Since you only have these that's why you see DFS channel still as there are no other options and backhaul use channels 100&amp;gt; and up.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Add more channels by selecting checkbox thru GUI.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Channel-802.11a.PNG" style="width: 597px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/27987iC78F48C90235044B/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Channel-802.11a.PNG" alt="Channel-802.11a.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Or CLI,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;config advanced 802.11a channel add 52&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;config advanced 802.11a channel add 56&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;config advanced 802.11a channel add 60&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;config advanced 802.11a channel add 64&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;config advanced 802.11a channel add 149&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;config advanced 802.11a channel add 153&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;config advanced 802.11a channel add 157&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;config advanced 802.11a channel add 161&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;HTH, please rate helpful posts.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 20:05:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/force-channel-assignment-radar-problems/m-p/3781457#M167850</guid>
      <dc:creator>superego</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-16T20:05:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Force channel assignment - Radar problems</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/force-channel-assignment-radar-problems/m-p/3781535#M167851</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I know there is an identified bug on radar detection and we worked with TAC. But we did not want to disable the &amp;gt;100 channel where the DFS applies. In your case, I am not sure if the configuration you made is actually removing those &amp;gt;100 channels. Please check:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE class="codeblock" style="margin: 0.5em 0px 20px; padding: 0px; border: 0px currentColor; border-image: none; text-align: left; color: rgb(88, 88, 91); text-transform: none; line-height: 1.2em; text-indent: 0px; letter-spacing: normal; font-family: monospace; font-size: 1.6rem; font-style: normal; font-weight: 400; word-spacing: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; -ms-overflow-x: auto; -ms-overflow-y: visible !important; max-width: 100%; orphans: 2; widows: 2; font-stretch: inherit; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-variant-numeric: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial;"&gt;ap1520-rap # &lt;SPAN class="synph" style="font: inherit; margin: 12px 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px currentColor; border-image: none; vertical-align: baseline; font-size-adjust: inherit; font-stretch: inherit;"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="kwd" style="margin: 12px 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px currentColor; border-image: none; line-height: inherit; font-family: inherit; font-size: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: bold; vertical-align: baseline; font-stretch: inherit;"&gt;show mesh channels&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Run a debug as indicated in the following link and provide output&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/technology/mesh/8-1/design/guide/b_mesh_81/Troubleshooting.html#ID9488" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/technology/mesh/8-1/design/guide/b_mesh_81/Troubleshooting.html#ID9488&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE class="codeblock" style="margin: 0.5em 0px 20px; padding: 0px; border: 0px currentColor; border-image: none; text-align: left; color: rgb(88, 88, 91); text-transform: none; line-height: 1.2em; text-indent: 0px; letter-spacing: normal; font-family: monospace; font-size: 1.6rem; font-style: normal; font-weight: 400; word-spacing: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; -ms-overflow-x: auto; -ms-overflow-y: visible !important; max-width: 100%; orphans: 2; widows: 2; font-stretch: inherit; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-variant-numeric: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 22:25:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/force-channel-assignment-radar-problems/m-p/3781535#M167851</guid>
      <dc:creator>ajc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-16T22:25:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Force channel assignment - Radar problems</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/force-channel-assignment-radar-problems/m-p/3781974#M167852</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Sir, thanks for your answer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The product version is 8.5.135.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;attached the output you requested.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 11:36:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/force-channel-assignment-radar-problems/m-p/3781974#M167852</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alfonsoj</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-17T11:36:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Force channel assignment - Radar problems</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/force-channel-assignment-radar-problems/m-p/3782103#M167853</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks so much for your reply!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for your point of view but even activating the rest of ports:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Picture4.JPG" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/28068i58143FBE6B43DC74/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Picture4.JPG" alt="Picture4.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have the same limitation with custom channels:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Picture2.JPG" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/28069iC542A4E137D26B6E/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Picture2.JPG" alt="Picture2.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope I understood your point.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 14:30:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/force-channel-assignment-radar-problems/m-p/3782103#M167853</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alfonsoj</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-17T14:30:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Force channel assignment - Radar problems</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/force-channel-assignment-radar-problems/m-p/3782120#M167854</link>
      <description>&lt;P style="text-align: left;"&gt;Thanks for providing the output.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="text-align: left;"&gt;I see that you're using:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE class="bp-text bp-text-plain hljs"&gt;&lt;CODE class="txt"&gt;Configured Country............................... ES  - Spain

&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P style="text-align: left;"&gt;which falls under the ETSI regulatory domain and explains why you're unable to see the other channels as in North America does.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="text-align: left;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Reg Dom.JPG" style="width: 869px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/28071i00AA383478CD5C64/image-dimensions/869x714?v=v2" width="869" height="714" role="button" title="Reg Dom.JPG" alt="Reg Dom.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 14:44:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/force-channel-assignment-radar-problems/m-p/3782120#M167854</guid>
      <dc:creator>superego</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-17T14:44:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Force channel assignment - Radar problems</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/force-channel-assignment-radar-problems/m-p/3782137#M167855</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Many thanks for your quick answer &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Well, what you are telling make sense but there should be a way to once DFS is disabled use lower channels to avoid the radar interference. This is disconnecting the clients and it is a real nightmare.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks in advance&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:02:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/force-channel-assignment-radar-problems/m-p/3782137#M167855</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alfonsoj</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-17T15:02:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Force channel assignment - Radar problems</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/force-channel-assignment-radar-problems/m-p/3782252#M167856</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Mister:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you kindly be a little more specific? I am sending the commands with no feedback so I assume (of course) that i am doing something wrong&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-center" image-alt="Picture5.JPG" style="width: 557px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/28085i765238AB378D9669/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Picture5.JPG" alt="Picture5.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;thanks in advance Sir&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 16:30:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/force-channel-assignment-radar-problems/m-p/3782252#M167856</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alfonsoj</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-17T16:30:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Force channel assignment - Radar problems</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/force-channel-assignment-radar-problems/m-p/3782939#M167857</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Only&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;U-NII-2C band can be used for backhaul channels that's why you'll only see channels 100-140.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;H3 class="p_H_Head4"&gt;Europe&lt;/H3&gt;
&lt;P class="pB1_Body1"&gt;U-NII-1&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="pB1_Body1"&gt;23 dBm Maximum - Not permitted for outdoor usage&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="pB1_Body1"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="pB1_Body1"&gt;U-NII-2A&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="pB1_Body1"&gt;23 dBm Maximum - Not permitted for outdoor usage&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="pB1_Body1"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Frequency Bands Supported.jpg" style="width: 796px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/28199iBF2D4769D79B6F3E/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Frequency Bands Supported.jpg" alt="Frequency Bands Supported.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Reference:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/8-5/Enterprise-Mobility-8-5-Design-Guide/Enterprise_Mobility_8-5_Deployment_Guide/Chapter-8.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/8-5/Enterprise-Mobility-8-5-Design-Guide/Enterprise_Mobility_8-5_Deployment_Guide/Chapter-8.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 12:58:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/force-channel-assignment-radar-problems/m-p/3782939#M167857</guid>
      <dc:creator>superego</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-18T12:58:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Force channel assignment - Radar problems</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/force-channel-assignment-radar-problems/m-p/3782950#M167858</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Since you have limited channels which are also DFS channels.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Solution i can think of is that you set Backhaul Channel width to 40/80 MHz.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In this way, you'll still have redundancy like if you use 80 MHz, 4 channels will be used so if a radar swept on one channel, you still have another channel that works.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;***Please mark post that is helpful / mark as a solution&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 13:12:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/force-channel-assignment-radar-problems/m-p/3782950#M167858</guid>
      <dc:creator>superego</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-18T13:12:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Force channel assignment - Radar problems</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/force-channel-assignment-radar-problems/m-p/3784072#M167859</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sirs, thanks so much for your ideas and support. I am waiting remote access to test latests solutions. In the meantime I was thinking that adding 2 more antennas for each AP (4 in total per each AP) can help to avoid the AP&amp;nbsp;disassociation?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Make it sense for you?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2019 09:28:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/force-channel-assignment-radar-problems/m-p/3784072#M167859</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alfonsoj</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-21T09:28:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Force channel assignment - Radar problems</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/force-channel-assignment-radar-problems/m-p/3784351#M167860</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;All the backhaul channels in your 5GHz domain are on DFS.&amp;nbsp; Try setting the backhaul Channel Width to 80 MHz. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Adding more antenna will still have same effect just give more bandwidth.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2019 15:49:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/force-channel-assignment-radar-problems/m-p/3784351#M167860</guid>
      <dc:creator>superego</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-21T15:49:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Force channel assignment - Radar problems</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/force-channel-assignment-radar-problems/m-p/3785102#M167861</link>
      <description>If you have only attached 2 of the 4 antennas, have you disabled the antenna-ports correctly in the configuration? Otherwise you will also have other issues, like no or extremely bad performance.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:32:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/force-channel-assignment-radar-problems/m-p/3785102#M167861</guid>
      <dc:creator>patoberli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-22T14:32:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

