<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic High Channel Utilization in High density Environment in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilization-in-high-density-environment/m-p/3304809#M167878</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm seeing a high channel utilisation on our APs in a high density environment with lots of APs being deployed to cope with capacity. The lower date rates have been disabled. We've only enabled 18Mbs and above on the 5GHz only but using only channel 36,40,44 and 48 channels since we are close to the airport to avoid DFS.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But the APs are still seeing each other considerably even though they are operation on the lowest power (Level 6) and we have few channels to work with.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Will disabling 18Mbs&amp;nbsp; reduce the APs from seeing each other and will it help in bringing down the channel utilisations????&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 15:02:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Wales007</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-05T15:02:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>High Channel Utilization in High density Environment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilization-in-high-density-environment/m-p/3304809#M167878</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm seeing a high channel utilisation on our APs in a high density environment with lots of APs being deployed to cope with capacity. The lower date rates have been disabled. We've only enabled 18Mbs and above on the 5GHz only but using only channel 36,40,44 and 48 channels since we are close to the airport to avoid DFS.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But the APs are still seeing each other considerably even though they are operation on the lowest power (Level 6) and we have few channels to work with.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Will disabling 18Mbs&amp;nbsp; reduce the APs from seeing each other and will it help in bringing down the channel utilisations????&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 15:02:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilization-in-high-density-environment/m-p/3304809#M167878</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wales007</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T15:02:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High Channel Utilization in High density Environment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilization-in-high-density-environment/m-p/3304811#M167879</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The high channel utilisation is seen on some of these APs with few clients (13clients) connceted to them.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And with RX-SOP help in any way of bring the utilization down???? Right now the Rx-Sop is on default settings.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 14:56:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilization-in-high-density-environment/m-p/3304811#M167879</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wales007</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-02T14:56:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High Channel Utilization in High density Environment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilization-in-high-density-environment/m-p/3305035#M167880</link>
      <description>RX-SOP can help but that will reduce the CU from what the AP hears not with what a client or tool will show. You can disable more data rates. I have set some environments at 48mbps as mandatory and 54 and 36 as supported with the lowest tx power.  If your limited to only 4 channels then you are also limited by what you can do.  CU and client experience will vary and you should test that yourself and get feedback from others.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 02:00:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilization-in-high-density-environment/m-p/3305035#M167880</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-03T02:00:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High Channel Utilization in High density Environment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilization-in-high-density-environment/m-p/3305160#M167881</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi ,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Scott has mentioned a valid point and I resonate with what he has mentioned. However, in this case , I would like to go back to the initial problem.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What is the WLC code ? AP model ? Where are you seeing the channel utilization ? and what is the value ?&amp;nbsp; Can u paste the output of "show ap auto-rf 802.11a/b &amp;lt;AP name&amp;gt;" for any one AP ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Rx-SOP is kind of asking your AP to "don't pay heed to signals below x dBm" which may not solve the high channel utilization that you are seeing here. However, it may help to solve any roaming issues in a HD environment. There are a couple of bugs around false channel utilization. Hence, let's first focus on the software and hardware environment.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Manish&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 09:12:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilization-in-high-density-environment/m-p/3305160#M167881</guid>
      <dc:creator>Manish Mathur</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-03T09:12:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High Channel Utilization in High density Environment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilization-in-high-density-environment/m-p/3305405#M167882</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for replies guys.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Its version&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;8.2.141.0 using 5520 WLC and the APs are 3702i series. the channel utilisation varies but with few clients 16clients and atimes 8 clients on two APs, I am seeing Channel utilisation of 45% and 53% respectively . This tends to go a lot higher when it gets busy with clients, it can go over 65% CU.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Due to dry and glass walls which has low attenuation, the APs tend to see each other quick easily, hence the suggestion if more data rate to shrink the cells and prevent the APs from seeing each other less.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;show ap auto-rf 802.11a 000C04-012&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Number Of Slots.................................. 2&lt;BR /&gt;AP Name.......................................... 000C04-012&lt;BR /&gt;MAC Address...................................... 84:b2:61:c0:c2:d0&lt;BR /&gt; Slot ID........................................ 1&lt;BR /&gt; Radio Type..................................... RADIO_TYPE_80211a&lt;BR /&gt; Sub-band Type.................................. All&lt;BR /&gt; Noise Information&lt;BR /&gt; Noise Profile................................ PASSED&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 36................................... -94 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 40................................... -94 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 44................................... -95 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 48................................... -94 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 52................................... -96 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 56................................... -94 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 60................................... -95 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 64................................... -93 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 100.................................. -96 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 104.................................. -97 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 108.................................. -98 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 112.................................. -98 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 116.................................. -98 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 132.................................. -97 dBm&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;--More-- or (q)uit&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 136.................................. -98 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 140.................................. -97 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Interference Information&lt;BR /&gt; Interference Profile......................... PASSED&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 36................................... -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 40................................... -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 44................................... -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 48................................... -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 52................................... -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 56................................... -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 60................................... -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 64................................... -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 100.................................. -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 104.................................. -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 108.................................. -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 112.................................. -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 116.................................. -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 132.................................. -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 136.................................. -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 140.................................. -128 dBm @ 0 % busy&lt;BR /&gt; Rogue Histogram (20/40/80/160)&lt;BR /&gt; .............................................&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 36................................... 0/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;--More-- or (q)uit&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 40................................... 1/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 44................................... 0/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 48................................... 0/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 52................................... 0/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 56................................... 0/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 60................................... 0/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 64................................... 0/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 100.................................. 0/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 104.................................. 0/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 108.................................. 0/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 112.................................. 0/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 116.................................. 0/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 132.................................. 0/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 136.................................. 0/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;BR /&gt; Channel 140.................................. 0/ 0/ 0/ 0&lt;BR /&gt; Load Information&lt;BR /&gt; Load Profile................................. PASSED&lt;BR /&gt; Receive Utilization.......................... 0 %&lt;BR /&gt; Transmit Utilization......................... 0 %&lt;BR /&gt; Channel Utilization.......................... 72 %&lt;BR /&gt; Attached Clients............................. 14 clients&lt;BR /&gt; Coverage Information&lt;BR /&gt; Coverage Profile............................. PASSED&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;--More-- or (q)uit&lt;BR /&gt; Failed Clients............................... 0 clients&lt;BR /&gt; Client Signal Strengths&lt;BR /&gt; RSSI -100 dbm................................ 0 clients&lt;BR /&gt; RSSI -92 dbm................................ 0 clients&lt;BR /&gt; RSSI -84 dbm................................ 0 clients&lt;BR /&gt; RSSI -76 dbm................................ 0 clients&lt;BR /&gt; RSSI -68 dbm................................ 2 clients&lt;BR /&gt; RSSI -60 dbm................................ 6 clients&lt;BR /&gt; RSSI -52 dbm................................ 6 clients&lt;BR /&gt; Client Signal To Noise Ratios&lt;BR /&gt; SNR 0 dB.................................. 0 clients&lt;BR /&gt; SNR 5 dB.................................. 0 clients&lt;BR /&gt; SNR 10 dB.................................. 0 clients&lt;BR /&gt; SNR 15 dB.................................. 0 clients&lt;BR /&gt; SNR 20 dB.................................. 0 clients&lt;BR /&gt; SNR 25 dB.................................. 1 clients&lt;BR /&gt; SNR 30 dB.................................. 2 clients&lt;BR /&gt; SNR 35 dB.................................. 7 clients&lt;BR /&gt; SNR 40 dB.................................. 1 clients&lt;BR /&gt; SNR 45 dB.................................. 3 clients&lt;BR /&gt; Nearby APs&lt;BR /&gt; AP 2c:33:11:1a:41:60 slot 1.................. -65 dBm on 116 20MHz (172.23.141.245) 000C04-008&lt;BR /&gt; AP 84:b2:61:6e:29:90 slot 1.................. -72 dBm on 40 20MHz (172.23.141.245) 000C04-021&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;--More-- or (q)uit&lt;BR /&gt; AP 84:b2:61:be:71:90 slot 1.................. -54 dBm on 44 20MHz (172.23.141.245) 000C04-010&lt;BR /&gt; AP 84:b2:61:c6:fe:f0 slot 1.................. -58 dBm on 36 20MHz (172.23.141.245) 000C04-020&lt;BR /&gt; AP 84:b2:61:c7:08:20 slot 1.................. -63 dBm on 116 20MHz (172.23.141.245) 000C04-018&lt;BR /&gt; AP 84:b2:61:c7:08:50 slot 1.................. -76 dBm on 36 20MHz (172.23.141.245) 000C04-004&lt;BR /&gt; AP 84:b2:61:c7:9a:e0 slot 1.................. -59 dBm on 48 20MHz (172.23.141.245) 000C04-009&lt;BR /&gt; AP 84:b2:61:c8:21:c0 slot 1.................. -42 dBm on 116 20MHz (172.23.141.245) 000C04-013&lt;BR /&gt; AP 84:b2:61:c8:65:b0 slot 1.................. -64 dBm on 40 20MHz (172.23.141.245) 000C04-017&lt;BR /&gt; AP 84:b2:61:ce:2c:90 slot 1.................. -61 dBm on 64 20MHz (172.23.141.245) 000C04-019&lt;BR /&gt; AP 84:b2:61:cf:89:e0 slot 1.................. -69 dBm on 48 20MHz (172.23.141.245) 000C04-022&lt;BR /&gt; AP 84:b2:61:cf:91:40 slot 1.................. -73 dBm on 44 20MHz (172.23.141.245) 000C04-005&lt;BR /&gt; AP 84:b2:61:d1:35:40 slot 1.................. -50 dBm on 44 20MHz (172.23.141.245) 000C04-014&lt;BR /&gt; AP 84:b2:61:d1:36:c0 slot 1.................. -43 dBm on 116 20MHz (172.23.141.245) 000C04-011&lt;BR /&gt; AP 84:b2:61:d1:36:e0 slot 1.................. -70 dBm on 40 20MHz (172.23.141.245) 000C04-006&lt;BR /&gt; AP 84:b2:61:d1:37:50 slot 1.................. -53 dBm on 48 20MHz (172.23.141.245) 000C04-016&lt;BR /&gt; AP 84:b2:61:d1:3c:40 slot 1.................. -61 dBm on 36 20MHz (172.23.141.245) 000C04-015&lt;BR /&gt; AP 88:1d:fc:26:22:c0 slot 1.................. -74 dBm on 48 20MHz (172.23.141.245) 000GA16&lt;BR /&gt; AP 88:1d:fc:48:0b:30 slot 1.................. -76 dBm on 140 20MHz (172.23.141.245) 000GA22&lt;BR /&gt; AP 88:1d:fc:57:dd:70 slot 1.................. -71 dBm on 44 20MHz (172.23.141.245) 000GA21&lt;BR /&gt; AP 88:1d:fc:57:e3:b0 slot 1.................. -64 dBm on 40 20MHz (172.23.141.245) 000GA20&lt;BR /&gt; AP b0:aa:77:7b:96:f0 slot 1.................. -69 dBm on 40 20MHz (172.23.141.245) 000CA11&lt;BR /&gt; AP b0:aa:77:7b:b2:b0 slot 1.................. -71 dBm on 60 20MHz (172.23.141.245) 000CA12&lt;BR /&gt; AP c4:0a:cb:5c:32:70 slot 1.................. -76 dBm on 52 20MHz (172.23.141.245) 000W2A3&lt;BR /&gt; AP c4:0a:cb:5c:7b:80 slot 1.................. -76 dBm on 40 20MHz (172.23.141.245) 000B2A3&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;--More-- or (q)uit&lt;BR /&gt; AP c4:0a:cb:5c:7d:10 slot 1.................. -74 dBm on 44 20MHz (172.23.141.245) 000B4A3&lt;BR /&gt; AP c4:0a:cb:5c:82:80 slot 1.................. -73 dBm on 44 20MHz (172.23.141.245) 000B1A3&lt;BR /&gt; AP c4:0a:cb:5c:85:80 slot 1.................. -73 dBm on 36 20MHz (172.23.141.245) 000B1A1&lt;BR /&gt; AP c4:0a:cb:64:54:c0 slot 1.................. -72 dBm on 40 20MHz (172.23.141.245) 000C01A4&lt;BR /&gt; AP c4:0a:cb:64:57:70 slot 1.................. -68 dBm on 44 20MHz (172.23.141.245) 000B3A3&lt;BR /&gt; AP c4:0a:cb:64:5e:70 slot 1.................. -65 dBm on 36 20MHz (172.23.141.245) 000BN4A3&lt;BR /&gt; AP d4:a0:2a:9b:5a:b0 slot 1.................. -74 dBm on 36 20MHz (172.23.141.245) 000C2A3&lt;BR /&gt; AP d4:a0:2a:d0:6a:20 slot 1.................. -72 dBm on 48 20MHz (172.23.141.245) 000C3A3&lt;BR /&gt; Radar Information&lt;BR /&gt; Channel Assignment Information&lt;BR /&gt; Current Channel Average Energy............... -55 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Previous Channel Average Energy.............. -55 dBm&lt;BR /&gt; Channel Change Count......................... 46&lt;BR /&gt; Last Channel Change Time..................... Wed Jan 3 03:00:17 2018&lt;BR /&gt; Recommended Best Channel..................... 48&lt;BR /&gt; RF Parameter Recommendations&lt;BR /&gt; Power Level.................................. 6&lt;BR /&gt; RTS/CTS Threshold............................ 2347&lt;BR /&gt; Fragmentation Threshold...................... 2346&lt;BR /&gt; Antenna Pattern.............................. 0&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Persistent Interference Devices&lt;BR /&gt; Class Type Channel DC (%%) RSSI (dBm) Last Update Time&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;--More-- or (q)uit&lt;BR /&gt; ------------------------- ------- ------ ---------- ------------------------&lt;BR /&gt; All third party trademarks are the property of their respective owners.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;(WH01) &amp;gt;?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 15:47:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilization-in-high-density-environment/m-p/3305405#M167882</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wales007</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-03T15:47:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High Channel Utilization in High density Environment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilization-in-high-density-environment/m-p/3305451#M167883</link>
      <description>You can try to disable more data rates but that only allows devices to connect to a specific AP if the client can negotiate at that rate. CU will happen all the way out to 1mbps since you only have 4 channels that you are using, your CU should be as high as the 2.4ghz to be honest. We have sites in APAC that only can use 4 channels also and you just try to get it down as much as you can and then there is not much more you can do. We have tested applications with CU of 75%+ with no user complaints. Now user experience varies from site to site or in different regions of the globe. So do what you can to make it usable. That’s what I do and the only thing you can do.  &lt;BR /&gt;If your focus is to lower it more, then you will have to shut some radios off. Don’t know if that’s what you want to do. &lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 17:12:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilization-in-high-density-environment/m-p/3305451#M167883</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-03T17:12:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High Channel Utilization in High density Environment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilization-in-high-density-environment/m-p/3305796#M167884</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Wales,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the output. First of all I am surprised to see that the Rx and Tx utilization is 0 even when you have 14 clients attached to this AP. and still the CU is 72%. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt; When we move down in this output , we can notice that more than 2 APs are being heard very loud on the same channel which this AP is working on. This is basically co-channel interference (CCI).&amp;nbsp; If this is the case on radio 1 , I can imagine the situation on Radio 0.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Now, as Scott mentioned , the reason may be that too many APs are deployed in this area. U may be aiming for an HD deployment when u did the site-survey. I am not sure. But going with the number of clients on the APs , I don't think it's an HD deployment. Thus, my recommendation would be to try with turning off a few radios strategically (going with the floor plan and obstacles). See if that helps. I hope that it should.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Manish&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2018 06:37:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilization-in-high-density-environment/m-p/3305796#M167884</guid>
      <dc:creator>Manish Mathur</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-04T06:37:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High Channel Utilization in High density Environment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilization-in-high-density-environment/m-p/3306061#M167885</link>
      <description>I back his suggestion. Based on the amount of clients per AP (if the number should stay below 20), disable some radios. &lt;BR /&gt;Even though you are close to an airport, you might want to check if they really use all DFS frequencies for radar. If not (which is probably the case) you might get 1-10 additional channels to use without disturbing the airport/having outages from the AP changing the channel. Anyway, based on the neighbors you have to many APs. An alternative would be to use external, directional antennas (if the AP permits external ones).&lt;BR /&gt;I've sorted your table a bit different, to make it better readable:&lt;BR /&gt;84:b2:61:c6:fe:f0	-58	dBm	36	20MHz	000C04-020&lt;BR /&gt;84:b2:61:d1:3c:40	-61	dBm	36	20MHz	000C04-015&lt;BR /&gt;c4:0a:cb:64:5e:70	-65	dBm	36	20MHz	000BN4A3&lt;BR /&gt;c4:0a:cb:5c:85:80	-73	dBm	36	20MHz	000B1A1&lt;BR /&gt;d4:a0:2a:9b:5a:b0	-74	dBm	36	20MHz	000C2A3&lt;BR /&gt;84:b2:61:c7:08:50	-76	dBm	36	20MHz	000C04-004&lt;BR /&gt;					&lt;BR /&gt;84:b2:61:c8:65:b0	-64	dBm	40	20MHz	000C04-017&lt;BR /&gt;88:1d:fc:57:e3:b0	-64	dBm	40	20MHz	000GA20&lt;BR /&gt;b0:aa:77:7b:96:f0	-69	dBm	40	20MHz	000CA11&lt;BR /&gt;84:b2:61:d1:36:e0	-70	dBm	40	20MHz	000C04-006&lt;BR /&gt;84:b2:61:6e:29:90	-72	dBm	40	20MHz	000C04-021&lt;BR /&gt;c4:0a:cb:64:54:c0	-72	dBm	40	20MHz	000C01A4&lt;BR /&gt;c4:0a:cb:5c:7b:80	-76	dBm	40	20MHz	000B2A3&lt;BR /&gt;					&lt;BR /&gt;84:b2:61:d1:35:40	-50	dBm	44	20MHz	000C04-014&lt;BR /&gt;84:b2:61:be:71:90	-54	dBm	44	20MHz	000C04-010&lt;BR /&gt;c4:0a:cb:64:57:70	-68	dBm	44	20MHz	000B3A3&lt;BR /&gt;88:1d:fc:57:dd:70	-71	dBm	44	20MHz	000GA21&lt;BR /&gt;84:b2:61:cf:91:40	-73	dBm	44	20MHz	000C04-005&lt;BR /&gt;c4:0a:cb:5c:82:80	-73	dBm	44	20MHz	000B1A3&lt;BR /&gt;c4:0a:cb:5c:7d:10	-74	dBm	44	20MHz	000B4A3&lt;BR /&gt;					&lt;BR /&gt;84:b2:61:d1:37:50	-53	dBm	48	20MHz	000C04-016&lt;BR /&gt;84:b2:61:c7:9a:e0	-59	dBm	48	20MHz	000C04-009&lt;BR /&gt;84:b2:61:cf:89:e0	-69	dBm	48	20MHz	000C04-022&lt;BR /&gt;d4:a0:2a:d0:6a:20	-72	dBm	48	20MHz	000C3A3&lt;BR /&gt;88:1d:fc:26:22:c0	-74	dBm	48	20MHz	000GA16&lt;BR /&gt;					&lt;BR /&gt;c4:0a:cb:5c:32:70	-76	dBm	52	20MHz	000W2A3&lt;BR /&gt;					&lt;BR /&gt;b0:aa:77:7b:b2:b0	-71	dBm	60	20MHz	000CA12&lt;BR /&gt;					&lt;BR /&gt;84:b2:61:ce:2c:90	-61	dBm	64	20MHz	000C04-019&lt;BR /&gt;					&lt;BR /&gt;84:b2:61:c8:21:c0	-42	dBm	116	20MHz	000C04-013&lt;BR /&gt;84:b2:61:d1:36:c0	-43	dBm	116	20MHz	000C04-011&lt;BR /&gt;84:b2:61:c7:08:20	-63	dBm	116	20MHz	000C04-018&lt;BR /&gt;2c:33:11:1a:41:60	-65	dBm	116	20MHz	000C04-008&lt;BR /&gt;					&lt;BR /&gt;88:1d:fc:48:0b:30	-76	dBm	140	20MHz	000GA22&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2018 14:22:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilization-in-high-density-environment/m-p/3306061#M167885</guid>
      <dc:creator>patoberli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-04T14:22:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High Channel Utilization in High density Environment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilization-in-high-density-environment/m-p/3308873#M167886</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Guys,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot for the response. it has been very helpful. As I mentioned previously, the output sent was when the environment was very quiet and now that everyone is back to work (after the Xmas break) we are seeing 35 -40 users on some of the APs. I will turn off some of the radios as suggested, just worried that the APs wont be able to cope with more users (50-55 users or more) by the time we turn the radios off.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Another question, we are seeing some signals from APs' above the floor at&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt; -79 dBm,&amp;nbsp; -80 dBm on the same channel. Will this contribute to the channel attenuation and still cause Co-channel interference(CCI) to increase. I've always thought that APs with strong signals (-20dBm to -77dBm) will cause significant CCI&amp;nbsp; and anything else will be less significant.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If this can be clarified for me, it will be greatly appreciated.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 10:04:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilization-in-high-density-environment/m-p/3308873#M167886</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wales007</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-10T10:04:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High Channel Utilization in High density Environment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilization-in-high-density-environment/m-p/3308903#M167887</link>
      <description>If they only browse some websites, you should be fine with 50-80 users, without them noticing. This changes once latency sensitive applications come into play though.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;To your second question, if I understand it correctly, then to a certain degree yes.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 10:42:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilization-in-high-density-environment/m-p/3308903#M167887</guid>
      <dc:creator>patoberli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-10T10:42:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High Channel Utilization in High density Environment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilization-in-high-density-environment/m-p/3308911#M167888</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I agree with patoberli.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cisco actually claims to have at least 200 associations per Radio (total 400 for a dual band AP). With normal data needs , I have seen around 60 clients working with no complaints in our environment.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regarding the second question , I usually make sure that not more than 1 AP are being heard by any AP on the same channel with better than -80 dBm&amp;nbsp; strength.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Manish&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 10:50:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilization-in-high-density-environment/m-p/3308911#M167888</guid>
      <dc:creator>Manish Mathur</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-10T10:50:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High Channel Utilization in High density Environment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilization-in-high-density-environment/m-p/3308925#M167889</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks again for the responses.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;so how many users will you say the 3700 or probably 3800 APs can handle for video/voice users using Skype or Lync???&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;its going be challenging not seeing not seeing more APs at -79dBm.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I will probably be looking at replacing the APs with&amp;nbsp; patch antenna i reckon (AIR-ANT2566D4M-R) in the office area to minimise the spread all around the office.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:12:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilization-in-high-density-environment/m-p/3308925#M167889</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wales007</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-10T11:12:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High Channel Utilization in High density Environment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilization-in-high-density-environment/m-p/3308927#M167890</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;My experience with the 3700 APs says , not more than 30 clients using Voice on a single AP. With 3800 , the number may change given that it has MU-MIMO . But still I would like to stick to 30. Going beyond that always looked like a risk to me.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Manish&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:18:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilization-in-high-density-environment/m-p/3308927#M167890</guid>
      <dc:creator>Manish Mathur</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-10T11:18:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High Channel Utilization in High density Environment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilization-in-high-density-environment/m-p/3308936#M167891</link>
      <description>Now we're talking real time applications. Those are very latency sensitive. I also suggest to have no more than 30 simultaneous calls per 5 Ghz radio. &lt;BR /&gt;What you can do, if it's mixed traffic, use the controller feature AVC and prioritize Skype and Lync with gold, while the default should be set to bronze. That way you should get good results.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:42:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-channel-utilization-in-high-density-environment/m-p/3308936#M167891</guid>
      <dc:creator>patoberli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-10T11:42:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

