<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic High channel utilization can in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/channel-utilization/m-p/2716670#M167928</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;High channel utilization can have a lot of reasons, I make the assumption that we are talking about 2.4GHz here. Most of the times high channel utilization is being seen on the 2.4GHz due to the limited (non overlapping) channels and the fact that 2.4Ghz reaches about &lt;U&gt;2 times&lt;/U&gt; further than 5GHz signals do. But there are a few thing we can do to make the best of it.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;First of all what is your definition of "high"? If you look at the channel utilization of one of the access-point radios you will also see a "radio RX" and "radio TX" value. Those values show how much channel utilization that access-point radio is responsible for. When those values are low but the channel utilization is still much higher you run into something called co-channel interference (CCI). This basically means that other access-points in the neighborhood are using the same channel.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Now, if those other access-points are yours we can do the following things to make things better:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Check the current power levels of the radios and tune RRM if they are to high&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;No need to have them higher than your weakest client&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Disable lower data-rates so clients will try to roam earlier&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;You already have the lowest disabled, but there might be room for further tuning&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Use directional-antennas instead of omni&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Try to use as less SSID's as possible with features like "aaa override"&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Last but not least, just disable 2.4GHz radio's&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;You need to do a site survey before and after doing one of these things, if you really want to know the outcome. Use with caution.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Please rate useful posts... &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:01:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Freerk Terpstra</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-27T13:01:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Channel Utilization</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/channel-utilization/m-p/2716667#M167925</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are having 5508 controllers and 3702 access points. We see many of the ap's are showing high channel utilization and facing client disconnection. code 7.6.130.0.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also we found that RRM &amp;nbsp;, rf grouping leader controller ap are showing as nearby ap instead of the ap registered to this controller.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 10:30:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/channel-utilization/m-p/2716667#M167925</guid>
      <dc:creator>Prasan Venky</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T10:30:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Prasan, Can you please</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/channel-utilization/m-p/2716668#M167926</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Prasan,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you please check the data rates on both the radios:-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Attach the output of the following:-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wireless&amp;gt;&amp;gt;802.11a/n/ac&amp;gt;&amp;gt;Network&amp;gt;&amp;gt;Data rates&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 15.5555562973022px;"&gt;Wireless&amp;gt;&amp;gt;802.11b/g/n&amp;gt;&amp;gt;Network&amp;gt;&amp;gt;Data rates&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 15.5555562973022px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 15.5555562973022px;"&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 15.5555562973022px;"&gt;Shubham&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 06:51:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/channel-utilization/m-p/2716668#M167926</guid>
      <dc:creator>SHUBHAM GUPTA</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-03T06:51:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Shubam, Please find the</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/channel-utilization/m-p/2716669#M167927</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Shubam,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please find the screen shots&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 07:20:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/channel-utilization/m-p/2716669#M167927</guid>
      <dc:creator>Prasan Venky</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-03T07:20:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>High channel utilization can</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/channel-utilization/m-p/2716670#M167928</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;High channel utilization can have a lot of reasons, I make the assumption that we are talking about 2.4GHz here. Most of the times high channel utilization is being seen on the 2.4GHz due to the limited (non overlapping) channels and the fact that 2.4Ghz reaches about &lt;U&gt;2 times&lt;/U&gt; further than 5GHz signals do. But there are a few thing we can do to make the best of it.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;First of all what is your definition of "high"? If you look at the channel utilization of one of the access-point radios you will also see a "radio RX" and "radio TX" value. Those values show how much channel utilization that access-point radio is responsible for. When those values are low but the channel utilization is still much higher you run into something called co-channel interference (CCI). This basically means that other access-points in the neighborhood are using the same channel.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Now, if those other access-points are yours we can do the following things to make things better:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Check the current power levels of the radios and tune RRM if they are to high&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;No need to have them higher than your weakest client&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Disable lower data-rates so clients will try to roam earlier&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;You already have the lowest disabled, but there might be room for further tuning&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Use directional-antennas instead of omni&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Try to use as less SSID's as possible with features like "aaa override"&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Last but not least, just disable 2.4GHz radio's&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;You need to do a site survey before and after doing one of these things, if you really want to know the outcome. Use with caution.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Please rate useful posts... &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:01:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/channel-utilization/m-p/2716670#M167928</guid>
      <dc:creator>Freerk Terpstra</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-27T13:01:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

