<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Client roaming issue between APs in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/client-roaming-issue-between-aps/m-p/4036211#M169509</link>
    <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you for your reply, we moved to 8.5.151.0 recommanded by cisco.&lt;BR /&gt;We are in observation period.&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 14:45:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>abdelouahab.brahim1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-26T14:45:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Client roaming issue between APs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/client-roaming-issue-between-aps/m-p/4033704#M169506</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a wireless network built with Cisco WLC 5520 (in HA), AP 2800. WLC is running code 8.3.133.0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Randomly, client roaming goes wrong, all I can found in the debug client is this :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx : MAC of client&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;yy:yy:yy:yy:yy:yy : BSSID&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;*Dot1x_NW_MsgTask_2: Nov 22 09:52:43.707: [PA] xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx Received EAPOL-Key from mobile xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx&lt;BR /&gt;*Dot1x_NW_MsgTask_2: Nov 22 09:52:43.707: [PA] xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx Ignoring invalid EAPOL version (1) in EAPOL-key message from mobile xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx&lt;BR /&gt;*Dot1x_NW_MsgTask_2: Nov 22 09:52:43.707: [PA] xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx key Desc Version FT - 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;*Dot1x_NW_MsgTask_2: Nov 22 09:53:52.366: [PA] xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx Received EAPOL-key message in invalid state from mobile xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;*apfOpenDtlSocket: Nov 22 09:55:08.983: [PA] xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx Recevied management frame REASSOCIATION REQUEST on BSSID yy:yy:yy:yy:yy:yy destination addr yy:yy:yy:yy:yy:y2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class="QmZWSe"&gt;&lt;DIV class="DHcWmd"&gt;Every time it's the same debug, and loss of connection until the client reasscoates with the AP with reassociation request.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class="DHcWmd"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class="DHcWmd"&gt;As you can see in this debug, about 1 minute and 16 seconde of loss of ping.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class="DHcWmd"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class="DHcWmd"&gt;We use [WPA2][Auth(802.1X + CCKM)] with a remote radius server (ACS) a cross the WAN.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class="DHcWmd"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class="DHcWmd"&gt;Any help is much appreciated.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class="DHcWmd"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class="DHcWmd"&gt;regards,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class="DHcWmd"&gt;Brahim,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 18:45:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/client-roaming-issue-between-aps/m-p/4033704#M169506</guid>
      <dc:creator>abdelouahab.brahim1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T18:45:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Client roaming issue between APs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/client-roaming-issue-between-aps/m-p/4033722#M169507</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think somehow the client send eapol pkt with the key version 1 that's ignored by the controller (version 2).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;is there a way to ignore the version check in the controller ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;*dot1xSocketTask: Nov 22 09:53:52.365: [PA] xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx validating eapol pkt: key version = 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;*Dot1x_NW_MsgTask_2: Nov 22 09:52:43.707: [PA] xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx Received EAPOL-Key from mobile xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx&lt;BR /&gt;*Dot1x_NW_MsgTask_2: Nov 22 09:52:43.707: [PA] xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx Ignoring invalid EAPOL version (1) in EAPOL-key message from mobile xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx&lt;BR /&gt;*Dot1x_NW_MsgTask_2: Nov 22 09:52:43.707: [PA] xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx key Desc Version FT - 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;*Dot1x_NW_MsgTask_2: Nov 22 09:53:52.366: [PA] xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx Received EAPOL-key message in invalid state from mobile xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;*apfOpenDtlSocket: Nov 22 09:55:08.983: [PA] xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx Recevied management frame REASSOCIATION REQUEST on BSSID yy:yy:yy:yy:yy:yy destination addr yy:yy:yy:yy:yy:y2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:59:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/client-roaming-issue-between-aps/m-p/4033722#M169507</guid>
      <dc:creator>abdelouahab.brahim1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T14:59:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Client roaming issue between APs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/client-roaming-issue-between-aps/m-p/4034108#M169508</link>
      <description>8.3.133.0 is very old and with no software maintenance support - see &lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/wireless/8500-series-wireless-controllers/bulletin-c25-742339.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/wireless/8500-series-wireless-controllers/bulletin-c25-742339.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you *must* run 8.3 for some reason then you should be running 8.3.150.x Escalation code which TAC will still support - see &lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless/wireless-lan-controller-software/200046-tac-recommended-aireos.html#anc11" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless/wireless-lan-controller-software/200046-tac-recommended-aireos.html#anc11&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you don't have to stay on 8.3 (eg. for very old APs) then you should seriously consider moving to 8.5 or later.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2020 13:48:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/client-roaming-issue-between-aps/m-p/4034108#M169508</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rich R</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-22T13:48:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Client roaming issue between APs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/client-roaming-issue-between-aps/m-p/4036211#M169509</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you for your reply, we moved to 8.5.151.0 recommanded by cisco.&lt;BR /&gt;We are in observation period.&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 14:45:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/client-roaming-issue-between-aps/m-p/4036211#M169509</guid>
      <dc:creator>abdelouahab.brahim1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-26T14:45:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Client roaming issue between APs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/client-roaming-issue-between-aps/m-p/4097742#M169510</link>
      <description>Hi&lt;BR /&gt;Any update on this, please?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 17:09:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/client-roaming-issue-between-aps/m-p/4097742#M169510</guid>
      <dc:creator>OddievenInc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-04T17:09:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Client roaming issue between APs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/client-roaming-issue-between-aps/m-p/4097821#M169511</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The upgrade solved the problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 18:56:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/client-roaming-issue-between-aps/m-p/4097821#M169511</guid>
      <dc:creator>abdelouahab.brahim1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-04T18:56:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

