<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 3702i Image? in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/3702i-image/m-p/3943804#M170242</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I've use autonomous before but I'm testing a solution for some of our remote office locations. We currently use an 8510 WLC across a DMVPN tunnel but this is a possible alternative.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2019 15:27:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>gmulvaney1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-10-19T15:27:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>3702i Image?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/3702i-image/m-p/3943782#M170238</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This should be a question with an obvious answer but the Google Gods haven't been clear. I'm trying to determine which image I need for a 3702i access poing with the master controller AP (mobility express) running 8.8.125 but can't seem to find anything other than 'the client APs must run the same version of code as the master', and I can't seem to locate an image for the 3702i that even resemble 8.8.125. Could someone point me in the right direction&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 18:10:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/3702i-image/m-p/3943782#M170238</guid>
      <dc:creator>gmulvaney1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T18:10:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3702i Image?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/3702i-image/m-p/3943797#M170239</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/484624"&gt;@gmulvaney1&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Check if this compatibility matrix helps you:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/compatibility/matrix/compatibility-matrix.html#pgfId-393660" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/compatibility/matrix/compatibility-matrix.html#pgfId-393660&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2019 15:10:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/3702i-image/m-p/3943797#M170239</guid>
      <dc:creator>luis_cordova</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-19T15:10:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3702i Image?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/3702i-image/m-p/3943800#M170240</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am not sure your model support ME, rather you can convert that to autonous AP&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;here is the good guide ?:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://mrncciew.com/2012/10/20/lightweight-to-autonomous-conversion/" target="_blank"&gt;http://mrncciew.com/2012/10/20/lightweight-to-autonomous-conversion/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/wireless/aironet-3700i-access-point/model.html#ConfigurationExamplesandTechNotes" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/wireless/aironet-3700i-access-point/model.html#ConfigurationExamplesandTechNotes&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2019 15:16:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/3702i-image/m-p/3943800#M170240</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-19T15:16:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3702i Image?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/3702i-image/m-p/3943802#M170241</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks! I'll give one of those a shot later today.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2019 15:25:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/3702i-image/m-p/3943802#M170241</guid>
      <dc:creator>gmulvaney1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-19T15:25:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3702i Image?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/3702i-image/m-p/3943804#M170242</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've use autonomous before but I'm testing a solution for some of our remote office locations. We currently use an 8510 WLC across a DMVPN tunnel but this is a possible alternative.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2019 15:27:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/3702i-image/m-p/3943804#M170242</guid>
      <dc:creator>gmulvaney1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-19T15:27:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3702i Image?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/3702i-image/m-p/3943805#M170243</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;if you have WLC, you can use your satellite to connec to central site, that is easy to manage, until you looking any specific local breakout.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;i do have deploy some, which required some device to extend the bridge to we have used autonomous.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2019 15:29:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/3702i-image/m-p/3943805#M170243</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-19T15:29:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

