<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: High ping latency to 8510 WLC in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-ping-latency-to-8510-wlc/m-p/3872987#M171055</link>
    <description>Now, or while the Ping latency was high?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It might also be a hung process on the WLC, but there I can't help.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:50:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>patoberli</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-06-14T10:50:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>High ping latency to 8510 WLC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-ping-latency-to-8510-wlc/m-p/3868017#M171050</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We're having issues with high ping latency to our 8510 WLC running 8.3.143.0 (although we've tried rolling back to earlier versions without making a difference).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What we've tried:-&lt;BR /&gt;Changing firmware (rolling back to 8.2.x releases previously used and forward again) - no difference to performance but seems to have broken things with Cisco Prime Infrastructure, which now reports "Device is in encrypted mode" when we try to backup the WLC config&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Switching between controllers (we have an active-standby HA pair) - no difference&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Inserting a 2960-X switch between the controller and the Nexus core switch so we can ping "in the middle of the cable" to determine whether the latency is WLC-side or Nexus-side (it's WLC-side)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When the system's quiet the ping response drops to sub-1ms, but when it's misbehaving we'll see three-figure ping responses. The bulk of the traffic on these breaks out at the APs themselves so the 10Gbit interface isn't showing as particularly busy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone have any suggestions we can try?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 17:31:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-ping-latency-to-8510-wlc/m-p/3868017#M171050</guid>
      <dc:creator>powys</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T17:31:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High ping latency to 8510 WLC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-ping-latency-to-8510-wlc/m-p/3868671#M171051</link>
      <description>Not sure I can help here, but from where to where do you ping?&lt;BR /&gt;Like: wireless client to virtual-interface</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2019 08:17:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-ping-latency-to-8510-wlc/m-p/3868671#M171051</guid>
      <dc:creator>patoberli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-06T08:17:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High ping latency to 8510 WLC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-ping-latency-to-8510-wlc/m-p/3872441#M171052</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Pinging from my wired desk connection to the Nexus core switch (fine)&lt;BR /&gt;Pinging from my wired desk connection to the intermediate 2960X installed for testing (fine)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pinging from my wired desk connection to the WLC (high latency)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pinging from the Nexus core switch to the intermediate 2960X (fine)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pinging from the Nexus core switch to the WLC (high latency)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pinging from the intermediate 2960X to the Nexus (fine)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pinging from the intermediate 2960X to the WLC (high latency)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;See below example (***.***.***.74 is the WLC, .1 is the Nexus), tested from the 2960X about a minute ago:-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;WLCTestSwitch#ping ***.***.***.74&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Type escape sequence to abort.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to ***.***.***.74, timeout is 2 seconds:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;!!!!!&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 737/867/975 ms&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;WLCTestSwitch#ping ***.***.***.1&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Type escape sequence to abort.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to ***.***.***.1, timeout is 2 seconds:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;!!!!!&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/2/4 ms&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif"&gt;UPDATE:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif"&gt;Half an hour later and it's back down to &amp;lt;1ms ping response.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2019 14:15:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-ping-latency-to-8510-wlc/m-p/3872441#M171052</guid>
      <dc:creator>powys</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-13T14:15:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High ping latency to 8510 WLC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-ping-latency-to-8510-wlc/m-p/3872882#M171053</link>
      <description>This could indicate an overloaded connection between the WLC and the switch it's attached to, or overloaded CPU on the WLC.&lt;BR /&gt;Please check, once it happens again, the used bandwidth of the wire and the CPU load.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 07:06:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-ping-latency-to-8510-wlc/m-p/3872882#M171053</guid>
      <dc:creator>patoberli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-14T07:06:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High ping latency to 8510 WLC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-ping-latency-to-8510-wlc/m-p/3872961#M171054</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The 10Gbit connection to the WLC is showing 3/255 load inbound and outbound. The WLC itself shows 1% CPU usage and 33% memory usage.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 09:40:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-ping-latency-to-8510-wlc/m-p/3872961#M171054</guid>
      <dc:creator>powys</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-14T09:40:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High ping latency to 8510 WLC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-ping-latency-to-8510-wlc/m-p/3872987#M171055</link>
      <description>Now, or while the Ping latency was high?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It might also be a hung process on the WLC, but there I can't help.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:50:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-ping-latency-to-8510-wlc/m-p/3872987#M171055</guid>
      <dc:creator>patoberli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-14T10:50:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High ping latency to 8510 WLC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-ping-latency-to-8510-wlc/m-p/3873186#M171056</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Both. The port and CPU usage seems constant regardless of whether the pings are poor or not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The WLC pair (they're a HA pair) have had numerous reboots as part of their firmware upgrades, but won't have had a power-cycle for a while. I'll try shutting each down and restarting.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 15:04:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-ping-latency-to-8510-wlc/m-p/3873186#M171056</guid>
      <dc:creator>powys</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-14T15:04:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High ping latency to 8510 WLC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-ping-latency-to-8510-wlc/m-p/3873817#M171057</link>
      <description>You should look at the switch port counters for anything that might indicate an issue.  What you can do since you have an HA SSO pair, is to issue a redundancy failover and see if there is high latency on the other unit.  This will isolate if there is a problem with a link connection or module perhaps.  During this failover, take some latency readings as the active unit will reboot and the secondary unit will become active.  See if the latency goes away during the reboot and comes back when the units both sync or not.  You can then provide this data back to us or to TAC if you have a case open.  Basically you are isolating each controller to see if its reproducible on both or not on both.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2019 17:47:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-ping-latency-to-8510-wlc/m-p/3873817#M171057</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-16T17:47:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High ping latency to 8510 WLC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-ping-latency-to-8510-wlc/m-p/3874893#M171058</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We've already failed the pair over and identified this as an issue on both controllers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I initially suspected it could be due to the core switch replacement (from a Catalyst 6500 to a Nexus 7000) hence the temporary 2960X inline with one of the controllers, but the results with the 2960X inline suggest it's at the controller end, not the Nexus end.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Last thing I tested was a power-cycle (watching the LAN interface lights following a failover request and pulling the plug as soon as they go out). Both controllers have had this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's behaving at the moment, if the latency ramps up later today I'll do the during-failover checks you suggested. Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2019 08:57:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-ping-latency-to-8510-wlc/m-p/3874893#M171058</guid>
      <dc:creator>powys</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-18T08:57:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High ping latency to 8510 WLC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-ping-latency-to-8510-wlc/m-p/3876720#M171059</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Failed over in the middle of a moderate (high 2-figure/low 3-figure ping) incident, it made no difference to the ping response even as it failed over.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here are the port stats from the Nexus, freshly cleared 5 minutes ago:-&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;admin state is up, Dedicated Interface&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Hardware: 1000/10000 Ethernet, address: 706e.6d**.**** (bia 706e.6d**.****)&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Description: WLC-04 (Secondary) via 2960X&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;reliability 255/255, txload 3/255, rxload 2/255&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Encapsulation ARPA, medium is broadcast&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Port mode is trunk&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;full-duplex, 10 Gb/s, media type is 10G&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Beacon is turned off&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Auto-Negotiation is turned on&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Input flow-control is off, output flow-control is off&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Auto-mdix is turned on&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Rate mode is dedicated&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Switchport monitor is off&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;EtherType is 0x8100&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;EEE (efficient-ethernet) : n/a&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Last link flapped 9week(s) 1day(s)&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Last clearing of "show interface" counters 00:05:01&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;0 interface resets&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Load-Interval #1: 30 seconds&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;30 seconds input rate 117574272 bits/sec, 23960 packets/sec&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;30 seconds output rate 118693504 bits/sec, 25719 packets/sec&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;input rate 117.57 Mbps, 23.96 Kpps; output rate 118.69 Mbps, 25.72 Kpps&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Load-Interval #2: 5 minute (300 seconds)&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;300 seconds input rate 114731432 bits/sec, 23774 packets/sec&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;300 seconds output rate 116003008 bits/sec, 25503 packets/sec&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;input rate 114.73 Mbps, 23.77 Kpps; output rate 116.00 Mbps, 25.50 Kpps&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;RX&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;7230303 unicast packets 8398 multicast packets 984 broadcast packets&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;7239796 input packets 4374089576 bytes&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;0 jumbo packets 0 storm suppression packets&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;0 runts 0 giants 0 CRC/FCS 0 no buffer&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;0 input error 0 short frame 0 overrun 0 underrun 0 ignored&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;0 watchdog 0 bad etype drop 0 bad proto drop 0 if down drop&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;0 input with dribble 0 input discard&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;0 Rx pause&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;TX&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;7760531 unicast packets 1275 multicast packets 2198 broadcast packets&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;7764088 output packets 4421211334 bytes&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;0 jumbo packets&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;0 output error 0 collision 0 deferred 0 late collision&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;0 lost carrier 0 no carrier 0 babble 0 output discard&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;0 Tx pause&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 12:25:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-ping-latency-to-8510-wlc/m-p/3876720#M171059</guid>
      <dc:creator>powys</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-20T12:25:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High ping latency to 8510 WLC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-ping-latency-to-8510-wlc/m-p/3876742#M171060</link>
      <description>Hmm weird, I would have expected the link to flap if the WLC gets failed over (and reboots):&lt;BR /&gt;Last link flapped 9week(s) 1day(s)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You sure look at the right port? (Sorry for asking this!)</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 13:03:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-ping-latency-to-8510-wlc/m-p/3876742#M171060</guid>
      <dc:creator>patoberli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-20T13:03:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High ping latency to 8510 WLC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-ping-latency-to-8510-wlc/m-p/3876820#M171061</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I was wondering if anyone would pick up on that &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This is the secondary controller with the temporary 2960X inline. Ports been up ever since the 2960X went in.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've just failed back to the primary controller (with link flap from the earlier failover), here are the port stats after 15 minutes:-&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Ethernet3/22 is up&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;admin state is up, Dedicated Interface&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Hardware: 1000/10000 Ethernet, address: 706e.6d**.**** (bia 706e.6d**.****)&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Description: WLC-04 (Primary)&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;reliability 255/255, txload 2/255, rxload 2/255&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Encapsulation ARPA, medium is broadcast&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Port mode is trunk&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;full-duplex, 10 Gb/s, media type is 10G&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Beacon is turned off&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Auto-Negotiation is turned on&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Input flow-control is off, output flow-control is off&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Auto-mdix is turned on&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Rate mode is dedicated&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Switchport monitor is off&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;EtherType is 0x8100&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;EEE (efficient-ethernet) : n/a&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Last link flapped 02:17:56&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Last clearing of "show interface" counters 00:15:35&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;0 interface resets&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Load-Interval #1: 30 seconds&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;30 seconds input rate 83163888 bits/sec, 17433 packets/sec&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;30 seconds output rate 85537392 bits/sec, 19152 packets/sec&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;input rate 83.16 Mbps, 17.43 Kpps; output rate 85.54 Mbps, 19.15 Kpps&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Load-Interval #2: 5 minute (300 seconds)&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;300 seconds input rate 92726472 bits/sec, 19262 packets/sec&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;300 seconds output rate 94194336 bits/sec, 20736 packets/sec&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;input rate 92.73 Mbps, 19.26 Kpps; output rate 94.19 Mbps, 20.74 Kpps&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;RX&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;20469286 unicast packets 3907 multicast packets 3904 broadcast packets&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;20477058 input packets 12869085381 bytes&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;0 jumbo packets 0 storm suppression packets&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;0 runts 0 giants 0 CRC/FCS 0 no buffer&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;0 input error 0 short frame 0 overrun 0 underrun 0 ignored&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;0 watchdog 0 bad etype drop 0 bad proto drop 0 if down drop&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;0 input with dribble 0 input discard&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;0 Rx pause&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;TX&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;21776425 unicast packets 27153 multicast packets 9976 broadcast packets&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;21813444 output packets 12986331538 bytes&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;0 jumbo packets&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;0 output error 0 collision 0 deferred 0 late collision&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;0 lost carrier 0 no carrier 0 babble 0 output discard&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;0 Tx pause&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 14:33:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-ping-latency-to-8510-wlc/m-p/3876820#M171061</guid>
      <dc:creator>powys</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-20T14:33:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High ping latency to 8510 WLC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-ping-latency-to-8510-wlc/m-p/3876870#M171062</link>
      <description>As expected, interface looks fine. &lt;BR /&gt;I would suggest you upgrade to 8.3.150.0 (fixes a lot of security issues and an important flash bug with the 2700+3700 series) or open a TAC.&lt;BR /&gt;Release notes: &lt;A href="http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/release/notes/crn83mr5.html#resolved_caveats" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/release/notes/crn83mr5.html#resolved_caveats&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 15:38:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-ping-latency-to-8510-wlc/m-p/3876870#M171062</guid>
      <dc:creator>patoberli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-20T15:38:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

