<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: strong variation in Ping Round Trip Time Tests in WLAN in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/strong-variation-in-ping-round-trip-time-tests-in-wlan/m-p/3218504#M172109</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp; thanks that's good to know - do you know how to measure the round trip time with iperf ? It only gives me bandwidth throughput and Total/Lost Datagrams - but we really like to know why according to ping there are so many spikes in the RTT.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 16:46:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ciscoprolin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-11-17T16:46:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>strong variation in Ping Round Trip Time Tests in WLAN</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/strong-variation-in-ping-round-trip-time-tests-in-wlan/m-p/3218433#M172102</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear All,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;do you if try to ping the Default Gateway from our eduroam wlan the Ping RTT is varying between 1 or 2 and up to 101ms within a short time. This can be observed in different Location even when the AP has low interference and the Client has a good RSSI of about -50dB.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Do you have any idea what acceptable RTT values are in the wireless lan (802.1x-based wlan with EAP-PEAP) ? Is there an official guide which I can consult about this and also how to optimize this behavior ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks very much,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thorsten&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 14:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/strong-variation-in-ping-round-trip-time-tests-in-wlan/m-p/3218433#M172102</guid>
      <dc:creator>ciscoprolin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T14:53:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: strong variation in Ping Round Trip Time Tests in WLAN</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/strong-variation-in-ping-round-trip-time-tests-in-wlan/m-p/3218447#M172103</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Ping is not a reliable tool to test. It is always recommended to perform Iperf test or file transfer to check the performance.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can verify if the client have better SNR or RSSI value.. Following command will give Rssi and snr value:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;---- Show client detail &amp;lt;mac of client&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;************* Please rate Useful posts*****************&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 15:38:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/strong-variation-in-ping-round-trip-time-tests-in-wlan/m-p/3218447#M172103</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vengatesa Prasath</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-17T15:38:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: strong variation in Ping Round Trip Time Tests in WLAN</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/strong-variation-in-ping-round-trip-time-tests-in-wlan/m-p/3218457#M172104</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Adding to my above post..&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;To do Iperf test you can refer: &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;A href="https://supportforums.cisco.com/t5/wireless-mobility-documents/iperf-test-for-measuring-the-throughput-speed-of-a-wlan-client/ta-p/3142047" target="_blank"&gt;https://supportforums.cisco.com/t5/wireless-mobility-documents/iperf-test-for-measuring-the-throughput-speed-of-a-wlan-client/ta-p/3142047&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Verify if the best practice is followed :&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/technology/wlc/8-5/82463-wlc-config-best-practice.html#pgfId-380235" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/technology/wlc/8-5/82463-wlc-config-best-practice.html#pgfId-380235&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;****************** Please Rate Useful Post****************&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 15:44:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/strong-variation-in-ping-round-trip-time-tests-in-wlan/m-p/3218457#M172104</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vengatesa Prasath</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-17T15:44:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: strong variation in Ping Round Trip Time Tests in WLAN</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/strong-variation-in-ping-round-trip-time-tests-in-wlan/m-p/3218461#M172105</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Vengathesa,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;can you tell my why ping is not recommended for this purpose ? Is there a reason behind it ? The RSSI values (according to show client detail &amp;lt;MAC&amp;gt; ranges between -50 and -60 dBm.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Are there any other useful alternatives to iperf which don't require to run a piece of software on the destination in the LAN ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks very much for your help,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thorsten&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 15:47:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/strong-variation-in-ping-round-trip-time-tests-in-wlan/m-p/3218461#M172105</guid>
      <dc:creator>ciscoprolin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-17T15:47:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: strong variation in Ping Round Trip Time Tests in WLAN</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/strong-variation-in-ping-round-trip-time-tests-in-wlan/m-p/3218472#M172106</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Ping on wlc is handled on best effort basis.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You could try with file transfer between wireless PC and wired PC. (Don't test file transfer between two wireless clients connected on same AP). &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;************** Please rate Useful Post***************&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 16:05:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/strong-variation-in-ping-round-trip-time-tests-in-wlan/m-p/3218472#M172106</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vengatesa Prasath</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-17T16:05:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: strong variation in Ping Round Trip Time Tests in WLAN</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/strong-variation-in-ping-round-trip-time-tests-in-wlan/m-p/3218476#M172107</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;does the same apply for pings from the wireless client to a wired client ? Will this also be handled by the WLC with lower priority ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thorsten&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 16:07:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/strong-variation-in-ping-round-trip-time-tests-in-wlan/m-p/3218476#M172107</guid>
      <dc:creator>ciscoprolin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-17T16:07:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: strong variation in Ping Round Trip Time Tests in WLAN</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/strong-variation-in-ping-round-trip-time-tests-in-wlan/m-p/3218482#M172108</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;yes, ICMP is not reliable tool to test throughput (especially in wireless).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 16:14:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/strong-variation-in-ping-round-trip-time-tests-in-wlan/m-p/3218482#M172108</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vengatesa Prasath</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-17T16:14:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: strong variation in Ping Round Trip Time Tests in WLAN</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/strong-variation-in-ping-round-trip-time-tests-in-wlan/m-p/3218504#M172109</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp; thanks that's good to know - do you know how to measure the round trip time with iperf ? It only gives me bandwidth throughput and Total/Lost Datagrams - but we really like to know why according to ping there are so many spikes in the RTT.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 16:46:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/strong-variation-in-ping-round-trip-time-tests-in-wlan/m-p/3218504#M172109</guid>
      <dc:creator>ciscoprolin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-17T16:46:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

