<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Thanks Michael, that makes a in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mcs-values/m-p/3011064#M172495</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Michael, that makes a lot more sense, yes I was running an 11ac connection.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2017 20:08:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>terrywatson651</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-05-15T20:08:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MCS Values</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mcs-values/m-p/3011062#M172493</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I carried out some iperf performance tests over a Cisco WLAN.&amp;nbsp; As part of the tests I recorded the connection speed of the client to the WLC.&amp;nbsp; Afterwards I noted something unusal.&amp;nbsp; For many of the 5GHz tests the WLC reproted a connection speed of M9 SS2 on a 40MHz bonded connection.&amp;nbsp; If I refer to an MCS table I get a value of either 54Mbps or 60Mbps depending on the Guard Interval.&amp;nbsp; If I am generous and say the throughput is 50% of the connection speed, at best we could expect a throughput of 30Mbps.&amp;nbsp; However my throughput tests showed download to the client of up to 190Mbps.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am running 8510 HA Controller Pair on version 8.3.102.0. and most APs connected to were 3702i.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The only answer is that I misinterpreting the speed vlaue as shown in the Controller, do we know if Cisco have there own MCS chart showing the actual speed represented by their M values?&amp;nbsp; Either that or am I fundamentally misinterpreting something.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 14:01:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mcs-values/m-p/3011062#M172493</guid>
      <dc:creator>terrywatson651</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T14:01:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>are you running an 11ac</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mcs-values/m-p/3011063#M172494</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;are you running an 11ac client and AP by any chance.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;MCS9 2SS 11ac gives you above 300Mbps.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;MCS9 2SS 11n only gives you the mentioned 54 or 60Mbps&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;http://www.wlanpros.com/mcs-index-802-11n-802-11ac-chart-3/&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2017 15:21:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mcs-values/m-p/3011063#M172494</guid>
      <dc:creator>michaelblum</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-15T15:21:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks Michael, that makes a</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mcs-values/m-p/3011064#M172495</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Michael, that makes a lot more sense, yes I was running an 11ac connection.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2017 20:08:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mcs-values/m-p/3011064#M172495</guid>
      <dc:creator>terrywatson651</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-15T20:08:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

