<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hi Martin, in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/interface-configuration-not-possible/m-p/3081857#M172878</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Martin,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE class="prettyprint"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1. there is an management interface with a static IP , lets say 192.168.158.17 / subnet: 255.255.192.0 / Gateway 192.168.191.254 / VLAN 30&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If you typed it correctly,192.168.158.17 with mask of 255.255.192.0 is a super large network.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Network address is 192.168.128.0/18 and valid host from 192.168.128.1 to 192.168.191.254.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So 192.168.178.0/23 network will be overlapping with it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Pls check the first subnet mask is right&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Rasika&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*** Pls rate all useful responses ***&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 03:25:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rasika Nayanajith</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-03-03T03:25:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>interface configuration not possible</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/interface-configuration-not-possible/m-p/3081856#M172877</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We&amp;nbsp;are on the way to replace our existing 4402 controller with a 5508 one.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;at the moment there is a problem with configuring some interfaces.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. there is an management interface with a static IP , lets say 192.168.158.17 / subnet: 255.255.192.0 / Gateway 192.168.191.254 / VLAN 30&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. there is annother dynamic interface &amp;nbsp;with an static IP, lets say 192.168.178.10 / subnet: 255.255.254.0 / Gateway 192.168.178.1 / VLAN 100&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The Controller tells me, that it is not possible to configure overlapping subnets. I understand this, and as i read inside the documentationthis is true.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But: these networks are on different VLAN´s and , these are 2 completely different Networks.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;additional: this cconfiguration is possible on the 4402 controller without any problems.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Question: is it possible to override this warning and why is the controller ignoring the VLAN tag. I understand that is not possible to have two overlapping net´s inside the same VLAN but i dont understand why this is not possible in &amp;nbsp;different VLAN.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Any Ideas?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;regards&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Martin&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 13:38:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/interface-configuration-not-possible/m-p/3081856#M172877</guid>
      <dc:creator>mshemon123</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T13:38:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Martin,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/interface-configuration-not-possible/m-p/3081857#M172878</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Martin,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE class="prettyprint"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1. there is an management interface with a static IP , lets say 192.168.158.17 / subnet: 255.255.192.0 / Gateway 192.168.191.254 / VLAN 30&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If you typed it correctly,192.168.158.17 with mask of 255.255.192.0 is a super large network.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Network address is 192.168.128.0/18 and valid host from 192.168.128.1 to 192.168.191.254.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So 192.168.178.0/23 network will be overlapping with it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Pls check the first subnet mask is right&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Rasika&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*** Pls rate all useful responses ***&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 03:25:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/interface-configuration-not-possible/m-p/3081857#M172878</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rasika Nayanajith</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-03T03:25:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Rasika,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/interface-configuration-not-possible/m-p/3081858#M172879</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Rasika,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;you are right. The netmask is correct. and the other is also correct.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;but: the Networks are on different VLAN ! So they dont see each other and have no direct contact.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Inside the 4402 Controller it is possible to configure and inside the 5508 it is not.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Why the Controller ignores the VLAN ! Setting ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Martin&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 14:30:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/interface-configuration-not-possible/m-p/3081858#M172879</guid>
      <dc:creator>mshemon123</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-03T14:30:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Martin,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/interface-configuration-not-possible/m-p/3081859#M172880</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Martin,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE class="prettyprint"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;inside the 4402 Controller it is possible to configure and inside the 5508 it is not.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;may be 4402 is not intelligent enough to check this.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE class="prettyprint"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Why the Controller ignores the VLAN ! Setting ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You should not&amp;nbsp;configure any overlapping IP addresses &amp;nbsp;in any cisco device (router, switch, wlc, ect). In fact Cisco devices should not allow you to do this, even you configure it by mistake.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;vlan number is not the important bit here. IP subnet is the key.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Note: you can mark the thread answered, if given response clarify your doubts.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Rasika&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 19:38:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/interface-configuration-not-possible/m-p/3081859#M172880</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rasika Nayanajith</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-03T19:38:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

