<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic 1552 Design Question... in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1552-design-question/m-p/2257366#M178165</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Thanks guys... that's unfortunante.&amp;nbsp; I guess we will have to use autonomous APs after the MAP/switch, which is not what the clients want.... they wanted everything to come off the WLC...maybe future releases...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It takes an Act of God to fade a wireless path, but any fool with a backhoe can cut fiber&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 18:13:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dennis Kline</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-07-19T18:13:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>1552 Design Question...</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1552-design-question/m-p/2257362#M178161</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Using autonomous APs, we often place an indoor AP behind a non-root bridge.&amp;nbsp; I want to do the same with a 1552, but there is some working in the design guide which causes me concern...&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;"It is not possible to connect a local, FlexConnect mode AP or a RAP behind MAP Ethernet port"&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; "&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; "&gt;To be clear, my desired configuration would be as follows:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;&lt;STRONG style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; "&gt;1)&amp;nbsp; 5508 WLC running 7.4 &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;&lt;STRONG style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; "&gt;2)&amp;nbsp; 1552 RAP&amp;nbsp; ----&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp; 1552 MAP&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;&lt;STRONG style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; "&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;&lt;STRONG style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; "&gt;3)&amp;nbsp; Ethernet port of MAP feeds a small switch&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;&lt;STRONG style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; "&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;&lt;STRONG style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; "&gt;4)&amp;nbsp; Switch ports feed indoor APs (3502) and one 1552 in "AP mode" (doesn't have L-O-S back to RAP)&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;&lt;STRONG style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; "&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;We do this all the time with autonomous APs.&amp;nbsp; Will the 1552 support this configuration ?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="text-align: center;"&gt;It takes an Act of God to fade a wireless path, but any fool with a backhoe can cut fiber&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 07:28:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1552-design-question/m-p/2257362#M178161</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dennis Kline</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T07:28:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>1552 Design Question...</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1552-design-question/m-p/2257363#M178162</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;So long as the AP behind the 1552 MAP connectedt to the switchare aIOS, that should work just fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The limitation has to do with CAPWAP in CAPWAP termination.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH, &lt;BR /&gt;Steve &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ &lt;BR /&gt;Please remember to rate useful posts, and mark questions as answered&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 14:42:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1552-design-question/m-p/2257363#M178162</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen Rodriguez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-19T14:42:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 1552 Design Question...</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1552-design-question/m-p/2257364#M178163</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't think Capwap in capwap is officially supported&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 16:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1552-design-question/m-p/2257364#M178163</guid>
      <dc:creator>Shaoqin Li</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-19T16:39:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 1552 Design Question...</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1552-design-question/m-p/2257365#M178164</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's not, that's why you can't put a WLC based AP behind the MAP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH, &lt;BR /&gt;Steve &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ &lt;BR /&gt;Please remember to rate useful posts, and mark questions as answered&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 16:54:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1552-design-question/m-p/2257365#M178164</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen Rodriguez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-19T16:54:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>1552 Design Question...</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1552-design-question/m-p/2257366#M178165</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Thanks guys... that's unfortunante.&amp;nbsp; I guess we will have to use autonomous APs after the MAP/switch, which is not what the clients want.... they wanted everything to come off the WLC...maybe future releases...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It takes an Act of God to fade a wireless path, but any fool with a backhoe can cut fiber&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 18:13:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1552-design-question/m-p/2257366#M178165</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dennis Kline</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-19T18:13:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>1552 Design Question...</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1552-design-question/m-p/2257367#M178166</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Well actually you can do this .. So long as the MESH ap termintaes to controller (A) and the local ap terminates to controller (B) this will work. You just cant terminate BOTH to the same WLC, its like CAPWAP inside CAPWAP. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;__________________________________________________________________________________________ &lt;BR /&gt;"Satisfaction does not come from knowing the solution, it comes from knowing why." - Rosalind Franklin &lt;BR /&gt;__________________________________________________________________________________________ &lt;BR /&gt;‎"I'm in a serious relationship with my Wi-Fi. You could say we have a connection."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 21:41:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1552-design-question/m-p/2257367#M178166</guid>
      <dc:creator>George Stefanick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-19T21:41:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>1552 Design Question...</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1552-design-question/m-p/2257368#M178167</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Where in in the great state of Texas are you from ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;__________________________________________________________________________________________ &lt;BR /&gt;"Satisfaction does not come from knowing the solution, it comes from knowing why." - Rosalind Franklin &lt;BR /&gt;__________________________________________________________________________________________ &lt;BR /&gt;‎"I'm in a serious relationship with my Wi-Fi. You could say we have a connection."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 21:41:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1552-design-question/m-p/2257368#M178167</guid>
      <dc:creator>George Stefanick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-19T21:41:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 1552 Design Question...</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1552-design-question/m-p/2257369#M178168</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I work in downtown Dallas .... at the electric company&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It takes an Act of God to fade a wireless path, but any fool with a backhoe can cut fiber&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jul 2013 23:49:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1552-design-question/m-p/2257369#M178168</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dennis Kline</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-21T23:49:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 1552 Design Question...</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1552-design-question/m-p/2257370#M178169</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;PRE __jive_macro_name="quote" class="jive_text_macro jive_macro_quote"&gt;&lt;P&gt;George Stefanick wrote:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Well actually you can do this .. So long as the MESH ap termintaes to controller (A) and the local ap terminates to controller (B) this will work. You just cant terminate BOTH to the same WLC, its like CAPWAP inside CAPWAP. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Interesting.&amp;nbsp; I will have to test this.. that may be a very workable solution&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.cisco.com/4.5.4/images/tiny_mce3/plugins/jiveemoticons/images/spacer.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jul 2013 23:54:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1552-design-question/m-p/2257370#M178169</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dennis Kline</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-21T23:54:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

