<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic CISCO ITP in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-itp/m-p/1906903#M180941</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Georg,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think you meant to post this in a different forum.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Justin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 01:01:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Justin Kurynny</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-08T01:01:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CISCO ITP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-itp/m-p/1906902#M180940</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;An interesting scenario here. Basically here is what happened:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have 4 cisco ITPs connected to several nodes via SIGTAN and TDM in our network. The ITP has logically been divided into 3&amp;nbsp; SGs (instance 0,1 and 2). &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In this particular case we added a fourth instance (instance 4) for a test node, and we all know that by default, the Network Appearance is the same as the instance number. in this case any AS configured instance 4 had a NA of 4. thing is, this instance (4) has to comminicate with a HLR operating in instance 1. thus did not work. so I changed the NA on the AS in instance 4 to 1 and walaa! it worked! , in so doing i messed up whatever was in instance 1 NA 1. Funny enough a wireshark trace showed me it was now expecting INSTANCE 4 NA 1, and not INSTANCE 1 NA 1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I get that the NA should be unique so that whatever is configured under a particular instance knows to what SS7 network it belongs to. What I dont understand is this: Each instance is a seperate SG and should NOT interfere with another one. So why did SG (instance 4) interfere with instance 1?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If anyone can help to shed some light onto this, i would be grateful. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Br&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Georg &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 04:44:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-itp/m-p/1906902#M180940</guid>
      <dc:creator>Georg Ndalut</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T04:44:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CISCO ITP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-itp/m-p/1906903#M180941</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Georg,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think you meant to post this in a different forum.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Justin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 01:01:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-itp/m-p/1906903#M180941</guid>
      <dc:creator>Justin Kurynny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-08T01:01:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

