<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Allow Multiple subnets in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/allow-multiple-subnets/m-p/1936219#M180998</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; I believe it will.&amp;nbsp; Currently, you are telling the AP that everything is flat, the native and all the SSID are linked to VLAN 1, which is why all of your bridge-groups show as bridge-group 1 in the AP config.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;By changing the native to be VLAN 100, this will make the interface Dot11Radio1.17 be a different VLAN, so all the management traffic will be untagged, but any traffic that really should be in VLAN 1, will be tagged for VLAN 1.&amp;nbsp; Currently all of the traffic is being sent untagged and getting put into VLAN 100 on the switch.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Keep in mind, that if one of the WLAN should be in VLAN 100, you want to map it to VLAN 100, and not VLAN 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:47:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Stephen Rodriguez</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-02T15:47:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Allow Multiple subnets</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/allow-multiple-subnets/m-p/1936208#M180987</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Good morning I hope someone can shed some light on the following problem.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I have 2 subnets both on seperate vlans - 1(static) and 100(dhcp).&amp;nbsp; I have the lwapp ap's set to receive a vlan 100 DHCP ip address from our server.&amp;nbsp; The switchport is trunked with a native vlan 100, this allows users to receive a vlan100 dhcp address. The problem is the users utilizing vlan 1 which is a static subnet are not allowed access through the access-point.&amp;nbsp; They can associate to the AP with no problem, but unable to past traffic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help would be appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Larnel&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 04:41:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/allow-multiple-subnets/m-p/1936208#M180987</guid>
      <dc:creator>larnelhight</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T04:41:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Allow Multiple subnets</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/allow-multiple-subnets/m-p/1936209#M180988</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Larnel,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; To clarify, do the users have to be in VLAN 1 to gain access to those resources?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you post the AP config?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 15:04:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/allow-multiple-subnets/m-p/1936209#M180988</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen Rodriguez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-01T15:04:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Allow Multiple subnets</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/allow-multiple-subnets/m-p/1936210#M180989</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, but only a select few.&amp;nbsp; Everyone else is on vlan 100 which works perfectly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The AP's are LWAPP so not real config on the ap itself.&amp;nbsp; Hreap Vlan is enabled on vlan 1.&amp;nbsp; The WLANS associated with the ap are vlan 1 as well.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 15:30:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/allow-multiple-subnets/m-p/1936210#M180989</guid>
      <dc:creator>larnelhight</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-01T15:30:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Allow Multiple subnets</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/allow-multiple-subnets/m-p/1936211#M180990</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; ok, so the problem is that users in VLAN 100 can't access the resources in VLAN 1.&amp;nbsp; Is that correct?&amp;nbsp; If not, please give me a detailed description of the issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 15:33:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/allow-multiple-subnets/m-p/1936211#M180990</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen Rodriguez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-01T15:33:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Allow Multiple subnets</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/allow-multiple-subnets/m-p/1936212#M180991</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;no, the users in vlan 1 cannot access the internet.&amp;nbsp; They can associate with the access-point, but the AP is not passing the traffic through.&amp;nbsp; If they are wired we have no problems.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;switchport config&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/35&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; description "APe8b7.48f5.1b21 - G0"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; switchport trunk native vlan 100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; switchport mode trunk&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; srr-queue bandwidth share 10 10 60 20&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; queue-set 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; priority-queue out&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; mls qos trust dscp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; auto qos voip trust&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; spanning-tree portfast trunk&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 15:45:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/allow-multiple-subnets/m-p/1936212#M180991</guid>
      <dc:creator>larnelhight</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-01T15:45:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Allow Multiple subnets</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/allow-multiple-subnets/m-p/1936213#M180992</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; ok, can you share the AP config?&amp;nbsp; more than likely you need to create another SSID and map it to VLAN 1, with the sub-interfaces created.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 15:48:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/allow-multiple-subnets/m-p/1936213#M180992</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen Rodriguez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-01T15:48:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Allow Multiple subnets</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/allow-multiple-subnets/m-p/1936214#M180993</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;version 12.4&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no service pad&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;service timestamps debug datetime msec&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;service timestamps log datetime msec&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;service password-encryption&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;logging rate-limit console 9&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aaa new-model&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aaa authentication login default local&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aaa authentication login reap_eap_methods group radius&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aaa session-id common&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;eap profile lwapp_eap_profile&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; method fast&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface Dot11Radio0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; no ip route-cache&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface Dot11Radio0.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; encapsulation dot1Q 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; no ip route-cache&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; bridge-group 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; bridge-group 1 subscriber-loop-control&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; bridge-group 1 block-unknown-source&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; no bridge-group 1 source-learning&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; no bridge-group 1 unicast-flooding&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface Dot11Radio0.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; encapsulation dot1Q 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; no ip route-cache&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; bridge-group 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; bridge-group 1 subscriber-loop-control&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; bridge-group 1 block-unknown-source&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; no bridge-group 1 source-learning&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; no bridge-group 1 unicast-flooding&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface Dot11Radio0.17&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; encapsulation dot1Q 17 native&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; no ip route-cache&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; bridge-group 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; bridge-group 1 block-unknown-source&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; no bridge-group 1 source-learning&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; no bridge-group 1 unicast-flooding&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface Dot11Radio1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; no ip route-cache&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface Dot11Radio1.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; encapsulation dot1Q 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; no ip route-cache&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; bridge-group 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; bridge-group 1 subscriber-loop-control&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; bridge-group 1 block-unknown-source&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; no bridge-group 1 source-learning&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; no bridge-group 1 unicast-flooding&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface Dot11Radio1.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; encapsulation dot1Q 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; no ip route-cache&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; bridge-group 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; bridge-group 1 subscriber-loop-control&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; bridge-group 1 block-unknown-source&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; no bridge-group 1 source-learning&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; no bridge-group 1 unicast-flooding&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface Dot11Radio1.17&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; encapsulation dot1Q 17 native&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; no ip route-cache&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; bridge-group 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; bridge-group 1 block-unknown-source&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; no bridge-group 1 source-learning&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; no bridge-group 1 unicast-flooding&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; no ip address&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; no ip route-cache&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; duplex auto&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; speed auto&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; no keepalive&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; encapsulation dot1Q 1 native&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; ip address dhcp client-id GigabitEthernet0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; no ip route-cache&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; bridge-group 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; no bridge-group 1 source-learning&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no ip http server&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;radius-server local&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; no authentication eapfast&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; no authentication leap&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; no authentication mac&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; group hreap&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;control-plane&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;end&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 15:53:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/allow-multiple-subnets/m-p/1936214#M180993</guid>
      <dc:creator>larnelhight</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-01T15:53:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Allow Multiple subnets</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/allow-multiple-subnets/m-p/1936215#M180994</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; yeah, everything is mapping to VLAN 100.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you screenshot the HREAP VLAN mappings?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 15:58:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/allow-multiple-subnets/m-p/1936215#M180994</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen Rodriguez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-01T15:58:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Allow Multiple subnets</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/allow-multiple-subnets/m-p/1936216#M180995</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;﻿&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://supportforums.cisco.com/sites/default/files/legacy/4/0/7/79704-ScreenClip.png" class="jive-image" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 16:03:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/allow-multiple-subnets/m-p/1936216#M180995</guid>
      <dc:creator>larnelhight</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-01T16:03:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Allow Multiple subnets</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/allow-multiple-subnets/m-p/1936217#M180996</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; with what you have configured here, all the traffic would be untagged, and sent down to the switch, which would put it in VLAN 100.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Try changing the native to be 100.&amp;nbsp; that should change the bridge groups on the HREAP to be correct.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 16:29:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/allow-multiple-subnets/m-p/1936217#M180996</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen Rodriguez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-01T16:29:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Allow Multiple subnets</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/allow-multiple-subnets/m-p/1936218#M180997</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;So changing the native to vlan 100 will allow the AP to pass vlan 1 traffic?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:37:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/allow-multiple-subnets/m-p/1936218#M180997</guid>
      <dc:creator>larnelhight</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-02T15:37:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Allow Multiple subnets</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/allow-multiple-subnets/m-p/1936219#M180998</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; I believe it will.&amp;nbsp; Currently, you are telling the AP that everything is flat, the native and all the SSID are linked to VLAN 1, which is why all of your bridge-groups show as bridge-group 1 in the AP config.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;By changing the native to be VLAN 100, this will make the interface Dot11Radio1.17 be a different VLAN, so all the management traffic will be untagged, but any traffic that really should be in VLAN 1, will be tagged for VLAN 1.&amp;nbsp; Currently all of the traffic is being sent untagged and getting put into VLAN 100 on the switch.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Keep in mind, that if one of the WLAN should be in VLAN 100, you want to map it to VLAN 100, and not VLAN 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:47:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/allow-multiple-subnets/m-p/1936219#M180998</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen Rodriguez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-02T15:47:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

