<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Do I need separate Access Points? in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/do-i-need-separate-access-points/m-p/1671402#M182442</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Thanks a lot.&amp;nbsp; When you say "funky configuration", are you implying complex configuration?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Joe&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2011 21:05:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jaighobahi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-06-19T21:05:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Do I need separate Access Points?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/do-i-need-separate-access-points/m-p/1671400#M182440</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am reading Cisco documentation on Wireless Local Area Network, but it is getting kind of confusing.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; If I need to design for wireless mobility in a network to support data, voice and guest, do I need to provide separate AP for data, separate AP for voice and separate AP for guest access?&amp;nbsp; Isn't there an AP that can support all three groups in one box? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Joe&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 03:19:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/do-i-need-separate-access-points/m-p/1671400#M182440</guid>
      <dc:creator>jaighobahi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T03:19:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Do I need separate Access Points?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/do-i-need-separate-access-points/m-p/1671401#M182441</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;PRE __jive_macro_name="quote" class="jive_text_macro jive_macro_quote"&gt;If I need to design for wireless mobility in a network to support data, voice and guest, do I need to provide separate AP for data, separate AP for voice and separate AP for guest access?&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes and no.&amp;nbsp; Each autonomous AP can support up to 16 SSID.&amp;nbsp; Controller-based can support up to 16 as well BUT if you have the firmware of 6.X and later then you can support up to 256 SSID with some funky configuration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NOTE:&amp;nbsp; To those who are reading this and know about the 5.X firmware, I ain't going to recommend anyone to this version.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2011 04:16:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/do-i-need-separate-access-points/m-p/1671401#M182441</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-19T04:16:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Do I need separate Access Points?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/do-i-need-separate-access-points/m-p/1671402#M182442</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Thanks a lot.&amp;nbsp; When you say "funky configuration", are you implying complex configuration?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Joe&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2011 21:05:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/do-i-need-separate-access-points/m-p/1671402#M182442</guid>
      <dc:creator>jaighobahi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-19T21:05:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Do I need separate Access Points?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/do-i-need-separate-access-points/m-p/1671403#M182443</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No.&amp;nbsp; Funky configuration like AP Groups.&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="grin" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.cisco.com/4.5.4/images/emoticons/grin.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 02:32:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/do-i-need-separate-access-points/m-p/1671403#M182443</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-20T02:32:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Do I need separate Access Points?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/do-i-need-separate-access-points/m-p/1671404#M182444</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Noted.&amp;nbsp; Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 05:52:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/do-i-need-separate-access-points/m-p/1671404#M182444</guid>
      <dc:creator>jaighobahi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-20T05:52:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Do I need separate Access Points?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/do-i-need-separate-access-points/m-p/1671405#M182445</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you please mark this Thread as "Answered" if you have no further questions?&amp;nbsp; Thank you very much. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:20:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/do-i-need-separate-access-points/m-p/1671405#M182445</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-20T22:20:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Do I need separate Access Points?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/do-i-need-separate-access-points/m-p/1671406#M182446</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You do not need separate ap's for each application. Best-practice recommendation is to have separate wlans/ssids and map them to different vlans. That helps segment the data for qos as well as security. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 21:12:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/do-i-need-separate-access-points/m-p/1671406#M182446</guid>
      <dc:creator>rupert.wever</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-01T21:12:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

