<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: reversed wiring on the RJ45 in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/reversed-wiring-on-the-rj45/m-p/1682066#M182530</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not so much into cables. However, autosensing on the switch refers to the ability to detect if a straight or a crossover cable was plugged.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The crossover cable is crossing specific pair, it's not a reverse of all connections. So I'd be surprised that any device would have made sense out of that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 17:48:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nicolas Darchis</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-05-27T17:48:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>reversed wiring on the RJ45</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/reversed-wiring-on-the-rj45/m-p/1682063#M182527</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am a installer and I &lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;reversed the wiring on the RJ45 connecter that plugs into the ethernet port on a Aironet wireless access point! It was already connected to the switch. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;So Pin 1 on the WAP RJ45 connector is Pin 8 at the switch and so on.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;The status light flashed green for about 30 seconds then went steady green. IS THIS OK?? Will it still work?? We just install the units and dont do the programming or testing. And I wont be able to go back and change the wiring unless I tell someone.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;Please does anyone know the answer to this? I will have to eat crow if I have to go back and redo the connector. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;Mark&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;614-876-6321&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;Thx&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 03:14:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/reversed-wiring-on-the-rj45/m-p/1682063#M182527</guid>
      <dc:creator>skiingbandit</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T03:14:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: reversed wiring on the RJ45</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/reversed-wiring-on-the-rj45/m-p/1682064#M182528</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You should do the job they paid you to do correctly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even if this switch is capable of autosensing, that doesn't mean that the next device they try to plug in will work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you're a professional installer, you should have a Fluke, and use it before you call the job complete.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 17:33:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/reversed-wiring-on-the-rj45/m-p/1682064#M182528</guid>
      <dc:creator>mages_mark</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-26T17:33:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: reversed wiring on the RJ45</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/reversed-wiring-on-the-rj45/m-p/1682065#M182529</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I went and fixed it the next day. But still curious to know if it would work both ways. So some switches are capable of "autosensing" ? The wiring can be totally wrong and it will still work?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 16:38:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/reversed-wiring-on-the-rj45/m-p/1682065#M182529</guid>
      <dc:creator>skiingbandit</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-27T16:38:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: reversed wiring on the RJ45</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/reversed-wiring-on-the-rj45/m-p/1682066#M182530</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not so much into cables. However, autosensing on the switch refers to the ability to detect if a straight or a crossover cable was plugged.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The crossover cable is crossing specific pair, it's not a reverse of all connections. So I'd be surprised that any device would have made sense out of that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 17:48:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/reversed-wiring-on-the-rj45/m-p/1682066#M182530</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nicolas Darchis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-27T17:48:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: reversed wiring on the RJ45</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/reversed-wiring-on-the-rj45/m-p/1682067#M182531</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have looked through the data sheets on both the switch a Cisco 3750 and the AP a Cisco 3502 and I cant find any reference to the pin out on the ethernet port- BUT it still worked both ways!! Since it is POE the power is being provided on 1 pair so if the wiring is reversed - the AP should not have even powered up if the wiring was reversed - but it did. It goes through the boot cycle flashing green - then goes steady green! That means the ethernet is OK?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now when I say it worked - I mean only that the AP powered up and got a link light. So how can this be?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The problem is fixed but the mystery remains&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 19:09:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/reversed-wiring-on-the-rj45/m-p/1682067#M182531</guid>
      <dc:creator>skiingbandit</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-27T19:09:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: reversed wiring on the RJ45</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/reversed-wiring-on-the-rj45/m-p/1682068#M182532</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;What 3750 model exactly?&amp;nbsp; Is it a plain 3750 or a 3750G or 3750X or 3750E?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The reason why I'm asking is because the 3750G, X and E support copper TDR.&amp;nbsp; Sadly, the plain 3750 doesn't.&amp;nbsp; *Mumble*, *mumble*, *mumble*&amp;nbsp; ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We've just finish rolling out &amp;gt;1000 APs and all I can say that I'm grateful someone enabled TDR support on the 2960 because we rejected alot of cable works from reputable companies.&amp;nbsp; The common fault we found were:&amp;nbsp; not all four pairs were terminated and Cat5E cables were JOINED with Cat6 cables.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is coupled with faulty patch cables from another reputable manufacturer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 04:24:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/reversed-wiring-on-the-rj45/m-p/1682068#M182532</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-28T04:24:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

