<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 1142n data rates - possible bug in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1142n-data-rates-possible-bug/m-p/1646131#M182815</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;MCS 7 is 72mbps at 20Mhz... If you want to get higher rates, like the 135mbps you said, you should use channel bonding (40mhz width)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 14:27:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>josuvarg</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-04-01T14:27:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>1142n data rates - possible bug</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1142n-data-rates-possible-bug/m-p/1646130#M182814</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am having a 5508 WLC with some1142n LAPs. The problem is that wireless clients&amp;nbsp; connect to the 802.11N 5Ghz however something is wrong with the data rates.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When i do show controllers dot11radio 1 in the AP i get&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Active Rates:&amp;nbsp; basic-12.0 18.0 24.0 36.0 48.0 54.0 m0. m1. m2. m3. m4. m5. m6. m7. m8. m9. m10. m11. m12. m13. m14. m15.&lt;BR /&gt;Current Rates:&amp;nbsp; basic-12.0 18.0 24.0 36.0 48.0 54.0 m0. m1. m2. m3. m4. m5. m6. m7. m8. m9. m10. m11. m12. m13. m14. m15.&lt;BR /&gt;Allowed Rates:&amp;nbsp; 6.0 9.0 12.0 18.0 24.0 36.0 48.0 54.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The allowed rates do not include the active rates.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I read that there is bug CSCti89945 but i am not the case as the controller came already with 7.0.98 version. I did not upgrade.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have checked that i am using a WLAN with only&amp;nbsp; WPA2 and AES, i enabled&amp;nbsp; WWM and i ve already enabled 802.11n support.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tested with an Ipad showing that the client connects with data rate m7.That means according to this &lt;A href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11n-2009" target="_blank"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11n-2009&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;135-150 Mbps?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 03:01:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1142n-data-rates-possible-bug/m-p/1646130#M182814</guid>
      <dc:creator>akisbouza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T03:01:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 1142n data rates - possible bug</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1142n-data-rates-possible-bug/m-p/1646131#M182815</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;MCS 7 is 72mbps at 20Mhz... If you want to get higher rates, like the 135mbps you said, you should use channel bonding (40mhz width)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 14:27:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1142n-data-rates-possible-bug/m-p/1646131#M182815</guid>
      <dc:creator>josuvarg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-01T14:27:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 1142n data rates - possible bug</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1142n-data-rates-possible-bug/m-p/1646132#M182816</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have already configured channel bonding however in the DCA Channel list i only see these channels 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When i enable Extended UNII-2 channels i see 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 100, 104, 108, 112, 116, 120, 124, 128, 132, 136, 140&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is that correct for channel bonding?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 14:40:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1142n-data-rates-possible-bug/m-p/1646132#M182816</guid>
      <dc:creator>akisbouza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-01T14:40:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 1142n data rates - possible bug</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1142n-data-rates-possible-bug/m-p/1646133#M182817</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Depending on what your wireless NIC card:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.&amp;nbsp; The so-called 300 mbps "N" rate is expressed in HALF duplex.&amp;nbsp; Halve the value and you get 150 mbps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.&amp;nbsp; Some wireless NIC cards doesn't really support 300 mbps.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 02:23:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1142n-data-rates-possible-bug/m-p/1646133#M182817</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-02T02:23:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

