<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: two wism module in vss mode in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/two-wism-module-in-vss-mode/m-p/1618115#M183264</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Mohammad,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From the WiSM perspective there is no active/standby concept.&lt;BR /&gt;All WiSM modules will always be active:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/ps9336/products_tech_note09186a0080a7c72b.shtml#wism"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/ps9336/products_tech_note09186a0080a7c72b.shtml#wism&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What changes between active/standby are the Supervisors.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fede&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;--&lt;BR /&gt;If&amp;nbsp; this helps you and/or answers your question please mark the question as&amp;nbsp; "answered" and/or rate it, so other users can easily find it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 09:17:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Federico Ziliotto</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-01-05T09:17:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>two wism module in vss mode</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/two-wism-module-in-vss-mode/m-p/1618114#M183263</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;i have two switches 6509 connected by vss technology&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i add two wism module ( one in each switch 6509 )&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i need to know if&amp;nbsp; two wism are operate active - active in vss or active - standby ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 02:37:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/two-wism-module-in-vss-mode/m-p/1618114#M183263</guid>
      <dc:creator>mohammad abdul jawad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T02:37:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: two wism module in vss mode</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/two-wism-module-in-vss-mode/m-p/1618115#M183264</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Mohammad,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From the WiSM perspective there is no active/standby concept.&lt;BR /&gt;All WiSM modules will always be active:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/ps9336/products_tech_note09186a0080a7c72b.shtml#wism"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/ps9336/products_tech_note09186a0080a7c72b.shtml#wism&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What changes between active/standby are the Supervisors.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fede&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;--&lt;BR /&gt;If&amp;nbsp; this helps you and/or answers your question please mark the question as&amp;nbsp; "answered" and/or rate it, so other users can easily find it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 09:17:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/two-wism-module-in-vss-mode/m-p/1618115#M183264</guid>
      <dc:creator>Federico Ziliotto</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-05T09:17:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: two wism module in vss mode</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/two-wism-module-in-vss-mode/m-p/1618116#M183265</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;if two wism are active - active in vss mode&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;how can deploy 300 AP in this case and make&amp;nbsp; controller redandacy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;also it&amp;nbsp; can use the same subnet for&amp;nbsp; managment + ap managment interface for&amp;nbsp; all&amp;nbsp; controller&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;for example&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;wism 1 hase two controller A and B &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;wism 2 hase two controller C and D &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;controoler A&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; managment + ap managment = 192.168.10.1/24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;controoler B&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; managment + ap managment = 192.168.10.2/24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;controoler C&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; managment + ap managment = 192.168.10.3/24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;controoler D&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; managment + ap managment = 192.168.10.4/24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;or&amp;nbsp; controller C and D&amp;nbsp; must have different subnet&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 13:24:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/two-wism-module-in-vss-mode/m-p/1618116#M183265</guid>
      <dc:creator>mohammad abdul jawad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-05T13:24:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: two wism module in vss mode</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/two-wism-module-in-vss-mode/m-p/1618117#M183266</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Mohammad,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Redundancy for the APs is achieved by configuring primary, secondary and tertiary controllers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is no redundancy between controllers in a way that one controller is in standby mode and keeps verifying whether another active controller is operational.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In your case, you could for example consider the following options:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;N + N redundancy:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;150 APs with primary controller A and secondary controller D for example.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;150 APs with primary controller C and secondary controller B for example.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This will allow an easier redundancy configuration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(pseudo) N + 1 redundancy:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;100 APs with primary controller A; 50 of them with secondary controller C and other 50 with secondary controller D.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;100 APs with primary controller B and secondary controller D.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;100 APs with primary controller C; 50 of them with secondary controller A and other 50 with secondary controller B.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is a bit trickier, but it would allow less load per controller and still a fairly robust redundancy in case one of the two Cat6k's goes down.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fede&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;--&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If&amp;nbsp; this helps you and/or answers your question please mark the question as&amp;nbsp; "answered" and/or rate it, so other users can easily find it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 13:45:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/two-wism-module-in-vss-mode/m-p/1618117#M183266</guid>
      <dc:creator>Federico Ziliotto</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-05T13:45:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: two wism module in vss mode</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/two-wism-module-in-vss-mode/m-p/1618118#M183267</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.cisco.com/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; thanks alot for this information&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:00:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/two-wism-module-in-vss-mode/m-p/1618118#M183267</guid>
      <dc:creator>mohammad abdul jawad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-05T15:00:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

