<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: LAP and WGB Deployment in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/lap-and-wgb-deployment/m-p/1471291#M184014</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In general the route to the WGB never changes in relatio to the core anyway.&amp;nbsp; It always will look like the WGB is behind the WLC to everything in the network.&amp;nbsp; Now, while the WGB roams from one AP to another, the WLC updates the MSCB entry for it, so it knows what AP to send traffic to.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:56:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Stephen Rodriguez</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-07-06T17:56:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>LAP and WGB Deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/lap-and-wgb-deployment/m-p/1471290#M184013</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a WGB in a mobile unit that will connect to fixed LAP along a route.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I understand the LWAPP tunneling and the idea behind that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The only thing I can wrap my head around is how the routing/switching works.&amp;nbsp; How does the WLC or WiSM (we have two 6500's with WiSM cards) actually keep track of where the WGB is along the route? Does it update a routing table? Is it directly connected?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks. I am willing to read whatever there is on the topic but I haven't figured out this piece.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;James&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 01:56:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/lap-and-wgb-deployment/m-p/1471290#M184013</guid>
      <dc:creator>jfraasch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T01:56:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LAP and WGB Deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/lap-and-wgb-deployment/m-p/1471291#M184014</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In general the route to the WGB never changes in relatio to the core anyway.&amp;nbsp; It always will look like the WGB is behind the WLC to everything in the network.&amp;nbsp; Now, while the WGB roams from one AP to another, the WLC updates the MSCB entry for it, so it knows what AP to send traffic to.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:56:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/lap-and-wgb-deployment/m-p/1471291#M184014</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen Rodriguez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-06T17:56:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LAP and WGB Deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/lap-and-wgb-deployment/m-p/1471292#M184015</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please mark the Question as Answered if the provided information is correct and issue is fixed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Vinay&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 14:48:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/lap-and-wgb-deployment/m-p/1471292#M184015</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vinay Sharma</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-29T14:48:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LAP and WGB Deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/lap-and-wgb-deployment/m-p/1471293#M184016</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Done a lot of practice with this now..&amp;nbsp; The LAP sends out a null packet after the WGB disconnects&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so that the rest of the network doesn't see the WGB as being behind it anymore.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 10:40:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/lap-and-wgb-deployment/m-p/1471293#M184016</guid>
      <dc:creator>jfraasch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-30T10:40:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

