<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic General Question regarding BVI &amp; Dot11 in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/general-question-regarding-bvi-dot11/m-p/1103707#M187015</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi There,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a general question concerning BVI &amp;amp; Dot11 interfaces on a 871W. I had to configure a Subinterface for the radio Interface to get he box running. This is the point which is a little confusing to me. Why do I have to work with subinterfaces to bring the radio up. Is it not possible to attach the radio interface to the bridge-group without using subinterfaces? There is only one VLAN (Vlan1 / native) in which all internal interfaces (fe &amp;amp; radio) should be member of. In order to bring the radio up I had to configure a subinterface for the radio and put this one in the bridge-group &amp;amp; Vlan. When I tried to to the same with the radio interface itself it did not come up (reset Status). Can anybody tell me why I need to use subinterfaces in this case? I like to understand.....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks...Andy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 23:55:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>heinzel0302</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-03T23:55:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>General Question regarding BVI &amp; Dot11</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/general-question-regarding-bvi-dot11/m-p/1103707#M187015</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi There,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a general question concerning BVI &amp;amp; Dot11 interfaces on a 871W. I had to configure a Subinterface for the radio Interface to get he box running. This is the point which is a little confusing to me. Why do I have to work with subinterfaces to bring the radio up. Is it not possible to attach the radio interface to the bridge-group without using subinterfaces? There is only one VLAN (Vlan1 / native) in which all internal interfaces (fe &amp;amp; radio) should be member of. In order to bring the radio up I had to configure a subinterface for the radio and put this one in the bridge-group &amp;amp; Vlan. When I tried to to the same with the radio interface itself it did not come up (reset Status). Can anybody tell me why I need to use subinterfaces in this case? I like to understand.....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks...Andy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 23:55:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/general-question-regarding-bvi-dot11/m-p/1103707#M187015</guid>
      <dc:creator>heinzel0302</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-03T23:55:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: General Question regarding BVI &amp; Dot11</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/general-question-regarding-bvi-dot11/m-p/1103708#M187016</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The BVI sub-interfaces map directly to the vlans that you create ie&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BVI10 - VLAN 10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BVI20 - VLAN 20 (Guest WLAN)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This allows you to have 2 SSID WLANS which I think is the maximum for the 871W&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mark&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 13:14:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/general-question-regarding-bvi-dot11/m-p/1103708#M187016</guid>
      <dc:creator>mark.cronin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-12-29T13:14:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

