<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Performance Data on MAP's and RAP's in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/performance-data-on-map-s-and-rap-s/m-p/1035745#M187604</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Can someone please tell me, as a rule of thumb, the bandwidth reduction in TCP/IP experienced the further the Client moves away from an Access Point on a Cisco Mesh Network?.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have Mobile Clients on a non Cisco outdoor Wireless Mesh Network and at the present time between the AP and 750m I am getting a full 6Mbps, at 1.5km I am receiving just  3Mbps, and at 3km  I am receiving 1.5Mbps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As our core network is Cisco, I would be interested in knowing the performance of the Cisco Mesh Network (AP) and whether the performance would be significant enough to replace the existing network&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance for your input.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 23:35:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>neillgray</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-03T23:35:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Performance Data on MAP's and RAP's</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/performance-data-on-map-s-and-rap-s/m-p/1035745#M187604</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Can someone please tell me, as a rule of thumb, the bandwidth reduction in TCP/IP experienced the further the Client moves away from an Access Point on a Cisco Mesh Network?.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have Mobile Clients on a non Cisco outdoor Wireless Mesh Network and at the present time between the AP and 750m I am getting a full 6Mbps, at 1.5km I am receiving just  3Mbps, and at 3km  I am receiving 1.5Mbps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As our core network is Cisco, I would be interested in knowing the performance of the Cisco Mesh Network (AP) and whether the performance would be significant enough to replace the existing network&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance for your input.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 23:35:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/performance-data-on-map-s-and-rap-s/m-p/1035745#M187604</guid>
      <dc:creator>neillgray</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-03T23:35:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance Data on MAP's and RAP's</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/performance-data-on-map-s-and-rap-s/m-p/1035746#M187605</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is the rate at which data is shared between the mesh access points. This is fixed for a whole network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Default data rate is 18 Mbps, which you should use for the backhaul.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Valid data rates:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;for 802.11a: 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 54&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But make sure that  NEVER change the data rate for a deployed mesh networking solution. If you do, each RAP and PAP may need to be manually reconfigured to restore the network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:52:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/performance-data-on-map-s-and-rap-s/m-p/1035746#M187605</guid>
      <dc:creator>amritpatek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-14T13:52:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

