<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: lbs calibration in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/lbs-calibration/m-p/942428#M188257</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It might be slightly different.  find out from AeroScout regarding their best practice.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:17:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-06-26T12:17:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>lbs calibration</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/lbs-calibration/m-p/942425#M188254</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone know how long the data collection process takes during the calibration process for lbs? I have read in the design guide (4.1) that it can take up to "a few minutes". Is this per data collection point? If so, how far apart are these suggested data collection points?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Justin&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 23:04:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/lbs-calibration/m-p/942425#M188254</guid>
      <dc:creator>jcetkoooo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-03T23:04:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: lbs calibration</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/lbs-calibration/m-p/942426#M188255</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's for each data collection point.  I have tried this running WLC 4.1.112 and LA 3.1.36 and applied to to 8 floors.  The result was worse than when I let the LA do it's own calibration it has.  So I ened up removing the calibration from the map.  I tried it again with another client and got the same results.... worse than if I left it alone.  Try it on a certain floor first and compare before you complete everything.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:26:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/lbs-calibration/m-p/942426#M188255</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-06-26T10:26:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: lbs calibration</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/lbs-calibration/m-p/942427#M188256</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ok thanks for the input.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One more question. I will be using AeroScout Mobile View as well. I imagine that the calibration process would be the same (via the WCS)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:12:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/lbs-calibration/m-p/942427#M188256</guid>
      <dc:creator>jcetkoooo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-06-26T12:12:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: lbs calibration</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/lbs-calibration/m-p/942428#M188257</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It might be slightly different.  find out from AeroScout regarding their best practice.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:17:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/lbs-calibration/m-p/942428#M188257</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-06-26T12:17:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

