<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 7920 Authentication Fail in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/7920-authentication-fail/m-p/726089#M189932</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I ran a debug and this is what I got:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Syslog logging: enabled (0 messages dropped, 2 messages rate-limited,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;                0 flushes, 0 overruns, xml disabled, filtering disabled)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    Console logging: level debugging, 3883 messages logged, xml disabled,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;                     filtering disabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    Monitor logging: level debugging, 0 messages logged, xml disabled,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;                     filtering disabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    Buffer logging: level debugging, 3884 messages logged, xml disabled,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;                    filtering disabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    Logging Exception size (4096 bytes)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    Count and timestamp logging messages: disabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    Trap logging: level informational, 2035 message lines logged&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Log Buffer (4096 bytes):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;t_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 001b.54e0.0ae6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:41:24.064: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 001b.54e0.0ae6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:41:24.179: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 001b.54e0.0ae6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:42:01.474: dot11_auth_dot1x_start: in the dot11_auth_dot1x_start&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:42:01.477: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 001b.54e0.0ae6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:42:01.481: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 001b.54e0.0ae6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:42:01.481: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: id is not matching req-id:1resp-id:2, waiting for response&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:42:01.483: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 001b.54e0.0ae6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:42:01.597: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 001b.54e0.0ae6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:42:01.711: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 001b.54e0.0ae6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:42:48.564: dot11_auth_dot1x_start: in the dot11_auth_dot1x_start&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:42:48.568: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 001b.54e0.0ae6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:42:48.571: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 001b.54e0.0ae6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:42:48.572: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: id is not matching req-id:1resp-id:2, waiting for response&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:42:48.573: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 001b.54e0.0ae6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:42:48.688: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 001b.54e0.0ae6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:42:48.804: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 001b.54e0.0ae6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:43:24.304: dot11_auth_dot1x_start: in the dot11_auth_dot1x_start&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:43:24.308: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 001b.54e0.0ae6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:43:24.312: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 001b.54e0.0ae6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:43:24.312: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: id is not matching req-id:1resp-id:2, waiting for response&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:43:24.314: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 001b.54e0.0ae6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:43:24.428: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 001b.54e0.0ae6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:43:24.543: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 001b.54e0.0ae6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 16:34:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>aherringiii</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-08-07T16:34:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>7920 Authentication Fail</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/7920-authentication-fail/m-p/726085#M189928</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have a Cisco 7920 that I can't seem to get configured to authenticate to our AP1242AG's.   Everything seem to be set correctly on the 7920, but I don't even see an "authentication failed" message on the AP!!   Am I missing something in configuring the AP for use with this device.  We are using a radius server, and I'm not seeing a request from the 7920 there either.  Any suggestions would be GREATLY appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 21:26:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/7920-authentication-fail/m-p/726085#M189928</guid>
      <dc:creator>aherringiii</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-03T21:26:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7920 Authentication Fail</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/7920-authentication-fail/m-p/726086#M189929</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would suggest to start simple first.  Open SSID w/o encryption.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ensure no WEP key is defined on the 7920.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Should associate fine then if SSID matches.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If not, then can sniff wirelessly to see if there are packets coming from the phone (probe request, authentication and assoication requests).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 17:21:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/7920-authentication-fail/m-p/726086#M189929</guid>
      <dc:creator>migilles</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-06T17:21:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7920 Authentication Fail</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/7920-authentication-fail/m-p/726087#M189930</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;unfortantely that's not an option right now.  I'm testing the phone for a remote client.  At that remote site, they have a call manager and WCS, here at corporate we don't use wireless phones.  But I should be able at the very least obtain an IP address for the phone on our production wireless network, yet this is not the case.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here at corporate we use a Radius server, and Cisco believes that may be the issue.  I just got off the phone with TAC, and they stated that the Radius must have a EAP-FAST PAC for the phone to download in order to authenticate with the AP.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 17:51:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/7920-authentication-fail/m-p/726087#M189930</guid>
      <dc:creator>aherringiii</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-06T17:51:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7920 Authentication Fail</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/7920-authentication-fail/m-p/726088#M189931</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;So you are trying to use EAP-FAST w/ the 7920s.  Ok, so if controller is set to 802.1x, then set the 7920 to EAP and if WPA or CCKM, then set to AKM on the 7920.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For EAP-FAST to be successful must increase the 802.1x timeout to at least 20 seconds on the controller.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;See the 7920 release notes @ &lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/voice/c_ipphon/english/wip7920/relnotes/rn302.htm#wp169464" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/voice/c_ipphon/english/wip7920/relnotes/rn302.htm#wp169464&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would better to try open first, especially if it's not working currently.  Must crawl before you can run.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 19:29:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/7920-authentication-fail/m-p/726088#M189931</guid>
      <dc:creator>migilles</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-06T19:29:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7920 Authentication Fail</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/7920-authentication-fail/m-p/726089#M189932</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I ran a debug and this is what I got:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Syslog logging: enabled (0 messages dropped, 2 messages rate-limited,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;                0 flushes, 0 overruns, xml disabled, filtering disabled)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    Console logging: level debugging, 3883 messages logged, xml disabled,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;                     filtering disabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    Monitor logging: level debugging, 0 messages logged, xml disabled,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;                     filtering disabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    Buffer logging: level debugging, 3884 messages logged, xml disabled,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;                    filtering disabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    Logging Exception size (4096 bytes)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    Count and timestamp logging messages: disabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    Trap logging: level informational, 2035 message lines logged&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Log Buffer (4096 bytes):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;t_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 001b.54e0.0ae6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:41:24.064: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 001b.54e0.0ae6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:41:24.179: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 001b.54e0.0ae6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:42:01.474: dot11_auth_dot1x_start: in the dot11_auth_dot1x_start&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:42:01.477: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 001b.54e0.0ae6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:42:01.481: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 001b.54e0.0ae6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:42:01.481: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: id is not matching req-id:1resp-id:2, waiting for response&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:42:01.483: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 001b.54e0.0ae6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:42:01.597: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 001b.54e0.0ae6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:42:01.711: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 001b.54e0.0ae6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:42:48.564: dot11_auth_dot1x_start: in the dot11_auth_dot1x_start&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:42:48.568: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 001b.54e0.0ae6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:42:48.571: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 001b.54e0.0ae6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:42:48.572: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: id is not matching req-id:1resp-id:2, waiting for response&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:42:48.573: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 001b.54e0.0ae6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:42:48.688: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 001b.54e0.0ae6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:42:48.804: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 001b.54e0.0ae6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:43:24.304: dot11_auth_dot1x_start: in the dot11_auth_dot1x_start&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:43:24.308: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 001b.54e0.0ae6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:43:24.312: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 001b.54e0.0ae6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:43:24.312: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: id is not matching req-id:1resp-id:2, waiting for response&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:43:24.314: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 001b.54e0.0ae6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:43:24.428: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 001b.54e0.0ae6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug  7 16:43:24.543: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 001b.54e0.0ae6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 16:34:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/7920-authentication-fail/m-p/726089#M189932</guid>
      <dc:creator>aherringiii</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-07T16:34:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7920 Authentication Fail</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/7920-authentication-fail/m-p/726090#M189933</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;GOT IT!!!!!  The 7920 broadcast a default username for EAP-FAST authorization.  (FAST-MAC ADDRESS), this has to match the username put on the physical phone in the Network Profiles--&amp;gt;Custom Profile--&amp;gt;802.11b Config--&amp;gt;EAP--&amp;gt;username.  This name must also be created in a VOIP profile on the ACS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 11:54:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/7920-authentication-fail/m-p/726090#M189933</guid>
      <dc:creator>aherringiii</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-09T11:54:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7920 Authentication Fail</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/7920-authentication-fail/m-p/726091#M189934</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Shouldn't be the case unless you are doing MAC authentication as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Identity response shouldn't matter with EAP-FAST.  7920 uses FAST-MAC like you stated.  7921 uses anonymous.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Of course w/ LEAP, this would be the true configured username on the client.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 21:02:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/7920-authentication-fail/m-p/726091#M189934</guid>
      <dc:creator>migilles</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-09T21:02:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7920 Authentication Fail</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/7920-authentication-fail/m-p/726092#M189935</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Take a look a this debug, specifically the RADIUS Username. (FAST-and the MAC)  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:25:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/7920-authentication-fail/m-p/726092#M189935</guid>
      <dc:creator>aherringiii</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-10T11:25:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

