<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 1410 Slow Performance  in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1410-slow-performance/m-p/754780#M189983</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you by chance just up grade the code?  One of our customers just upgraded the code on their 1410s and now have less than stellar performance.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 21:27:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>shanemason</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-08-02T21:27:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>1410 Slow Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1410-slow-performance/m-p/754779#M189982</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am running a VPN over a pair of 1410's and experiencing less than stellar performance ~ about 2Mb/sec. The radios are operating at 54Mb/sec, the signal strength is -32 dBm, the signal to noise is 59dBm, the Ethernet side is running clean.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The only errors that I can see on the wireless seem to be that when under load, the Retries seem to be almost 30% of the Unicast Packets Sent, with about 5% of the retries being multiple retries. The "Protocol Defers" and "Energy Detect Defers" seem to be about 1/3 - 1/2 of the Retries number.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On the VPN side, I have looked at the counters on the ASA5510's, which are dedicated to this link and the counters seem fine. I have adjusted the TCPMSS with the ASA5510 to 1380.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don not know exactly what is causing the Protocol Defers and Energy Detect Defers. I would imagine that some bandwidth loss could be the overhead from VPN and wireless "turn-around", but my expectation would be closer to 50%.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help would be appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 21:23:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1410-slow-performance/m-p/754779#M189982</guid>
      <dc:creator>msdavis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-03T21:23:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 1410 Slow Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1410-slow-performance/m-p/754780#M189983</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you by chance just up grade the code?  One of our customers just upgraded the code on their 1410s and now have less than stellar performance.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 21:27:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1410-slow-performance/m-p/754780#M189983</guid>
      <dc:creator>shanemason</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-02T21:27:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 1410 Slow Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1410-slow-performance/m-p/754781#M189984</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No - they are recent installs. But the code we are using is the 12.4.3 code, which is the latest and we just upgraded to the latest rev, just as a measure before opening a tac case.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did your customer back-rev the code and get the performance back? If so, may I ask what rev they went back to?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 22:33:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1410-slow-performance/m-p/754781#M189984</guid>
      <dc:creator>msdavis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-02T22:33:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 1410 Slow Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1410-slow-performance/m-p/754782#M189985</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, customer just emailed me and told me they rolled back, but didn't say what they rolled back to...  Here's the quote (slightly edited):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ok, pass this along?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DON?T USE THE LATEST FIRMWARE for the 1400s. When we did a physical factory reset, the **** things are flying?.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ggrrrrr&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps, please rate if so...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 01:39:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1410-slow-performance/m-p/754782#M189985</guid>
      <dc:creator>shanemason</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-03T01:39:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 1410 Slow Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1410-slow-performance/m-p/754783#M189986</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Well - Sounds like that might be something to try - it couldn't hurt.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for relaying the information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 02:58:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/1410-slow-performance/m-p/754783#M189986</guid>
      <dc:creator>msdavis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-03T02:58:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

