<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Non-Overlapping Channels in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/non-overlapping-channels/m-p/409736#M192524</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's pretty much as it sounds: the three channels (1, 6, and 11) are far enough apart that, once modulated / fully modulated, their frequencies do not "touch" at the edges. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The other channels 1&amp;lt;-&amp;gt;2, 2-&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;-4, 3-&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;-5 ...) have their center frequency close enough, that the modulated signal frequencies "touch" or overlap at the edges. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SO, if you had three APs, each on it's own channel (1, 6, and 11), they could operate in proximity without interfering with each other. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you had three access points on adjacent channels (1, 2, 3), because the frequencies *do* overlap, you're like to experience some interference in the course of their communication (which causes re-transmission, slowing things down considerably on busy channels). &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let us know if you need more details. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FWIW&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scott&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2005 01:34:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>scottmac</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-07-25T01:34:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Non-Overlapping Channels</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/non-overlapping-channels/m-p/409735#M192523</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;i understand that there are 11 channels in the 2.4gz band.  I also see that channels 1, 6 &amp;amp; 11 are said to be the only Non-Overlapping channels on the 2.4 frequency.  What I don't understand is what makes those 3 channels non-overlapping?  Can anyone give a simple explanation of this?  TIA.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 17:59:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/non-overlapping-channels/m-p/409735#M192523</guid>
      <dc:creator>bm_5789</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T17:59:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Non-Overlapping Channels</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/non-overlapping-channels/m-p/409736#M192524</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's pretty much as it sounds: the three channels (1, 6, and 11) are far enough apart that, once modulated / fully modulated, their frequencies do not "touch" at the edges. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The other channels 1&amp;lt;-&amp;gt;2, 2-&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;-4, 3-&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;-5 ...) have their center frequency close enough, that the modulated signal frequencies "touch" or overlap at the edges. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SO, if you had three APs, each on it's own channel (1, 6, and 11), they could operate in proximity without interfering with each other. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you had three access points on adjacent channels (1, 2, 3), because the frequencies *do* overlap, you're like to experience some interference in the course of their communication (which causes re-transmission, slowing things down considerably on busy channels). &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let us know if you need more details. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FWIW&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scott&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2005 01:34:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/non-overlapping-channels/m-p/409736#M192524</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottmac</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-07-25T01:34:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

