<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Bandwidth increase in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bandwidth-increase/m-p/426236#M192727</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Scott,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the fast response.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If  I want to double the bandwidth from  point to point scenario &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dose it possible??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dror&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2005 06:33:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DROR.MAROM</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-05-09T06:33:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Bandwidth increase</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bandwidth-increase/m-p/426234#M192725</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dose someone knows if I can increase bandwidth with two AP? (From 54mb &amp;gt;&amp;gt; 108mb)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;also,what is the best way to do it?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dror&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 17:44:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bandwidth-increase/m-p/426234#M192725</guid>
      <dc:creator>DROR.MAROM</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T17:44:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bandwidth increase</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bandwidth-increase/m-p/426235#M192726</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;From the perspective of getting 2X bandwidth from one client: NO ... can't do it. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From the perspective of having more bandwidth, so you can support more clients, then Yes ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;By putting several APs in one area, each on a different channel (1,6,and 11 are recommended) and setting the clients to use specific channels, you can double or triple your client count for a given area. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good Luck&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scott&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2005 15:39:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bandwidth-increase/m-p/426235#M192726</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottmac</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-05-08T15:39:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bandwidth increase</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bandwidth-increase/m-p/426236#M192727</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Scott,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the fast response.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If  I want to double the bandwidth from  point to point scenario &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dose it possible??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dror&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2005 06:33:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bandwidth-increase/m-p/426236#M192727</guid>
      <dc:creator>DROR.MAROM</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-05-09T06:33:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bandwidth increase</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bandwidth-increase/m-p/426237#M192728</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's not something I've ever tried, but it's conceivable that if you set up two pairs of wireless bridges, and fed them with a router (at each end), that the router(s) would load-share the parallel links.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The issues with this is *how* the router decides the path: simple round-robin / alternating ~probably~ will work OK .... but Ideally you'd want a system that sends the traffic down the least-loaded link ... more of a loadbalance than a load share.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the traffic is a good statistical mix of packet sizes, then straight-up load-sharing would probably do the trick ... &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How many hosts at the end-point, and what is the nature of the application from the perspective of amount of traffic, sensitivity to latency, packet sizes, etc (i.e., VoIP uses small packets ~ 200 bytes, database-style apps tend to use large packets ~1500 bytes). &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let use know and we can take the next leap.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scott&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2005 15:13:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bandwidth-increase/m-p/426237#M192728</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottmac</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-05-09T15:13:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

