<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Repeaters in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/repeaters/m-p/364694#M193166</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your first scenario would be correct. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even though there are (frequently) two antenna connectors on the device, they are for "diversity" to reduce multipath in closed environments. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Diversity only activates one antenna at a time. It is not meant for relay operations or to increase the area of coverage. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Setting up a pair of bridges will also give you a diagnostic point (used with a hub or mirror port switch). &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you use non-standard equipment (splitters, amps, non-Cisco cabling) then the system is at risk of violating local regulation for that frequency spectrum. By pre-testing all of the components, Cisco can certify that the system will be in compliance with the local regulations (there may be some legal issues also ...).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good Luck&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scott&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2004 00:17:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>scottmac</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2004-12-13T00:17:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Repeaters</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/repeaters/m-p/364692#M193164</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I havent had to setup any repeaters in the wireless networks I have designed..In this specific case, I can think of using a repeater to establish a wireless shot between four locations. Here is the scenario..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Site1---Site 2(Omni)----Site 3(Repeater)----Site4&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Site 2 is the hub site (Omni antenna) while Site 1 and 4 are spokes which will use Yagi antennas. Site 3 is a location which has LOS to Site 2. Site 4 does not have LOS to Site 2. In this case, how should Site 3 be designed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yagi---Bridge1----crossovercable----Bridge2---Yagi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OR&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yagi---Bridge-----Yagi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the first scenario two bridges will be installed in Site 3 and each bridge will use one Yagi antenna. The bridges are connected back to back using a cross over cable (or switch). Bridge 1 will shoot the signal back to Site 2, while Bridge 2 will shoot the signal to Site 4. Will this work ? Will there be a 50 % reduction in throughput like in case of a true repeater ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am not sure about Scenario 2 but any inputs will be very helpful.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 17:14:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/repeaters/m-p/364692#M193164</guid>
      <dc:creator>thisisshanky</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T17:14:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Repeaters</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/repeaters/m-p/364693#M193165</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You're right. The bandwith of the first design will be at 100%, the second design will lost 50% and the coverage won't be as big as the first one. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;By the way, I don't know if Cisco had make products to be fully compatible with your second design, the only one I saw like this need to plug a splitter for the antenna cable and plug in the two yagis.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2004 17:53:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/repeaters/m-p/364693#M193165</guid>
      <dc:creator>Georges-Alexandre Cotnoir</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-12-12T17:53:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Repeaters</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/repeaters/m-p/364694#M193166</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your first scenario would be correct. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even though there are (frequently) two antenna connectors on the device, they are for "diversity" to reduce multipath in closed environments. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Diversity only activates one antenna at a time. It is not meant for relay operations or to increase the area of coverage. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Setting up a pair of bridges will also give you a diagnostic point (used with a hub or mirror port switch). &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you use non-standard equipment (splitters, amps, non-Cisco cabling) then the system is at risk of violating local regulation for that frequency spectrum. By pre-testing all of the components, Cisco can certify that the system will be in compliance with the local regulations (there may be some legal issues also ...).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good Luck&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scott&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2004 00:17:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/repeaters/m-p/364694#M193166</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottmac</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-12-13T00:17:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Repeaters</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/repeaters/m-p/364695#M193167</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks gentlemen for your valuable responses. I did read somewhere that with Scenario 1, there is a 15 percent drop in throughput because of two devices involved..But I guess its much better than having 50 percent drop in Scenario 2..and obviously you get more distance in Scenario 1..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2004 03:42:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/repeaters/m-p/364695#M193167</guid>
      <dc:creator>thisisshanky</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-12-13T03:42:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

