<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Bridging Application in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bridging-application/m-p/289395#M193786</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are two things to take in consideration. One is the distance between the two sites. If the distance is less than a mile away with clear line of site, then you could possibly use the 350 wireless bridge at the main site and a 350 workgroup bridge at the site with 3-4 computers. If the distance between the sites is a mile or more, then you should use two 350 wireless bridges to connect the sites. You will be better off, no matter what, using two 350 wireless bridges in the long run.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2004 12:13:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>kmarrero</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2004-06-01T12:13:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Bridging Application</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bridging-application/m-p/289394#M193785</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have an application where we will be connecting two buildings using wireless.  The far-end will have approximately 3-4 computers attached the network.  Should I use a 350 bridge at the near-end and a 350 workgroup bridge at the far-end with a hub to accomplish this? Or, would I be better off using an Access Point at the near-end with the workgoup bridge at the far-end.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 16:40:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bridging-application/m-p/289394#M193785</guid>
      <dc:creator>rx33328</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T16:40:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bridging Application</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bridging-application/m-p/289395#M193786</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are two things to take in consideration. One is the distance between the two sites. If the distance is less than a mile away with clear line of site, then you could possibly use the 350 wireless bridge at the main site and a 350 workgroup bridge at the site with 3-4 computers. If the distance between the sites is a mile or more, then you should use two 350 wireless bridges to connect the sites. You will be better off, no matter what, using two 350 wireless bridges in the long run.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2004 12:13:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bridging-application/m-p/289395#M193786</guid>
      <dc:creator>kmarrero</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-06-01T12:13:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

