<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: bridge link failure in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bridge-link-failure/m-p/130597#M194980</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; a) please make sure that you are running latest firmware on the bridges .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; b) go to radio -&amp;gt; hardware , by default beacon is 100 , make it 4000 and see&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    if situation becomes better &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; c) Site survey , reduced coax cable length , better antenna all this will help &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; Nilesh &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2003 05:36:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ndoshi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-03-06T05:36:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>bridge link failure</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bridge-link-failure/m-p/130596#M194979</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The topology is a pont to point bridge link with 350 series bridges. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;rootbr&amp;lt;------WLAN----------&amp;gt;Non-rootbr&amp;lt;----&amp;gt;switch&amp;lt;----&amp;gt;Ethernet hosts&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Signal Str. 35%&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What could cause the following?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The link is working corretly, But about half an hour or random period the link go wrong. The signal strength is still 35% and the link test between the bridges is good. The device says that 100 packet attempt 100 succesful. But the ping between the devices not work.  And I cannot acces the devices behind the non-root bridge. After this I have several messages in the log.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The logs:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;root Bridge&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; (Info): Deauthentication from [Non-rootBR-Bfured]0040965867a5, reason "Not Authenticated"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2003/03/05 15:08:49 (Info): Station [Non-rootBR-Bfured]0040965867a5 Reassociated&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2003/03/05 15:08:49 (Info): Started driver for port "br10"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2003/03/05 15:08:49 (Info): Station [Non-rootBR-Bfured]0040965867a5 Authenticated&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2003/03/05 15:08:49 (Info): Deauthenticating [Non-rootBR-Bfured]0040965867a5, reason "Not Authenticated"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2003/03/05 15:08:49 (Info): Stopped driver for port "br10"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2003/03/05 15:08:49 (Info): Deauthentication from [Non-rootBR-Bfured]0040965867a5, reason "Not Authenticated"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2003/03/05 15:08:27 (Info): Station [Non-rootBR-Bfured]0040965867a5 Reassociated&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2003/03/05 15:08:27 (Info): Started driver for port "br10"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2003/03/05 15:08:27 (Info): Station [Non-rootBR-Bfured]0040965867a5 Authenticated&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2003/03/05 15:08:27 (Info): Deauthenticating [Non-rootBR-Bfured]0040965867a5, reason "Not Authenticated"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2003/03/05 15:08:27 (Info): Stopped driver for port "br10"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2003/03/05 15:08:27 (Info): Deauthentication from [Non-rootBR-Bfured]0040965867a5, reason "Not Authenticated"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2003/03/05 15:08:05 (Info): Station [Non-rootBR-Bfured]0040965867a5 Reassociated&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2003/03/05 15:08:05 (Info): Started driver for port "br10"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2003/03/05 15:08:05 (Info): Station [Non-rootBR-Bfured]0040965867a5 Authenticated&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2003/03/05 15:08:05 (Info): Deauthenticating [Non-rootBR-Bfured]0040965867a5, reason "Not Authenticated"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2003/03/05 15:08:05 (Info): Stopped driver for port "br10"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2003/03/05 15:08:05 (Info): Deauthentication from [Non-rootBR-Bfured]0040965867a5, reason "Not Authenticated"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Non-root Bridge w/0 clients&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; (Warning): Lost Authentication with Parent&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2003/03/05 15:08:52 (Info): Associated to Parent [ROOTBR-Bfured]00409654e940&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2003/03/05 15:08:52 (Warning): Lost Authentication with Parent&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2003/03/05 15:08:52 (Info): Associated to Parent [ROOTBR-Bfured]00409654e940&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2003/03/05 15:08:51 (Info): Deauthenticating [ROOTBR-Bfured]00409654e940, reason "Not Authenticated"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2003/03/05 15:08:51 (Warning): Lost Authentication with Parent&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2003/03/05 15:08:30 (Info): Associated to Parent [ROOTBR-Bfured]00409654e940&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2003/03/05 15:08:30 (Warning): Lost Authentication with Parent&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2003/03/05 15:08:30 (Info): Associated to Parent [ROOTBR-Bfured]00409654e940&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2003/03/05 15:08:29 (Info): Deauthenticating [ROOTBR-Bfured]00409654e940, reason "Not Authenticated"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2003/03/05 15:08:29 (Warning): Lost Authentication with Parent&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2003/03/05 15:08:08 (Info): Associated to Parent [ROOTBR-Bfured]00409654e940&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2003/03/05 15:08:08 (Warning): Lost Authentication with Parent&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2003/03/05 15:08:08 (Info): Associated to Parent [ROOTBR-Bfured]00409654e940&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2003/03/05 15:08:07 (Info): Deauthenticating [ROOTBR-Bfured]00409654e940, reason "Not Authenticated"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2003/03/05 15:08:07 (Warning): Lost Authentication with Parent&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 15:33:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bridge-link-failure/m-p/130596#M194979</guid>
      <dc:creator>s.matyas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T15:33:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: bridge link failure</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bridge-link-failure/m-p/130597#M194980</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; a) please make sure that you are running latest firmware on the bridges .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; b) go to radio -&amp;gt; hardware , by default beacon is 100 , make it 4000 and see&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    if situation becomes better &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; c) Site survey , reduced coax cable length , better antenna all this will help &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; Nilesh &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2003 05:36:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bridge-link-failure/m-p/130597#M194980</guid>
      <dc:creator>ndoshi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-03-06T05:36:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: bridge link failure</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bridge-link-failure/m-p/130598#M194981</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks your reply!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It seems that the raising the beacon period works. It can be useful in AP and Clint situations where the client continously reassociate to the AP with the failure lost authentication?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;szicsu&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2003 11:17:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bridge-link-failure/m-p/130598#M194981</guid>
      <dc:creator>s.matyas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-03-06T11:17:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: bridge link failure</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bridge-link-failure/m-p/130599#M194982</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;And there is a lot of clients that reassociates the AP continously.....Is the beacon period can help in this situation? What is the good value for APs?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks your reply in advance!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2003 16:54:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bridge-link-failure/m-p/130599#M194982</guid>
      <dc:creator>s.matyas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-03-06T16:54:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

