<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: BR350 Association problems in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/br350-association-problems/m-p/69569#M195659</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Spanning Tree is on by default.  You can not shut it off without changing the roles of the radios.  Leave Spanning Tree on.  When you say not associated, is it not showing up on the associations table or is it showing up unassigned?  If it is showing up unassigned, this will not change until traffic is passing through it.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2002 17:40:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>t-gawronski</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-04-23T17:40:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>BR350 Association problems</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/br350-association-problems/m-p/69565#M195655</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am bench testing 2 BR350 bridges to be used in a customer's production network.  I have one set for Root and the other set for Non-root without clients.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The channel and SSID match.  Initially the bridges connect and communicate without a problem.  When I remove power from one or both and then repower, they never establish the association.  Is this a timeout issue, bad bridge device?  Any help appreciated.  I do not want a customer call everytime their power blips!!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 06:02:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/br350-association-problems/m-p/69565#M195655</guid>
      <dc:creator>smildren</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T06:02:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BR350 Association problems</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/br350-association-problems/m-p/69566#M195656</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since there has been no response to your post, it appears to be either too complex or too rare an issue for other forum members to assist you.  If you don't get a suitable response to your post, you may wish to review our resources at the online Technical Assistance Center (&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/tac" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/tac&lt;/A&gt;) or speak with a TAC engineer.  You can open a TAC case online at &lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/tac/caseopen" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/tac/caseopen&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If anyone else in the forum has some advice, please reply to this thread.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;	&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for posting.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2002 22:01:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/br350-association-problems/m-p/69566#M195656</guid>
      <dc:creator>ciscomoderator</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-03-27T22:01:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BR350 Association problems</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/br350-association-problems/m-p/69567#M195657</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How are you re-establishing the connection following a power failure?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2002 20:07:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/br350-association-problems/m-p/69567#M195657</guid>
      <dc:creator>blue.modal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-03-29T20:07:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BR350 Association problems</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/br350-association-problems/m-p/69568#M195658</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;So far, I have had to disable spanning tree on the bridges.  This allows them to reassociate but drops them back to AP/Root and Site Survey client.  I then have to re-enable spanning tree.  I was under the impression that the re-association was "automatic".  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2002 13:07:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/br350-association-problems/m-p/69568#M195658</guid>
      <dc:creator>smildren</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-04-16T13:07:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BR350 Association problems</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/br350-association-problems/m-p/69569#M195659</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Spanning Tree is on by default.  You can not shut it off without changing the roles of the radios.  Leave Spanning Tree on.  When you say not associated, is it not showing up on the associations table or is it showing up unassigned?  If it is showing up unassigned, this will not change until traffic is passing through it.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2002 17:40:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/br350-association-problems/m-p/69569#M195659</guid>
      <dc:creator>t-gawronski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-04-23T17:40:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

