<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Flexconnect features limitation versus local mode in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/flexconnect-features-limitation-versus-local-mode/m-p/4092055#M198780</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;trying to find difference in available features on 9800l wlc for ap [from 3700 to 9130]/ssid deployed in flexconnect local switching mode versus local mode. Checking feature matrix (&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/technotes/8-8/b_flexConnect_feature_matrix.html" target="_self"&gt;9800 FlexConnect Feature matrix)&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;but i do not see major differences between modes.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i'm thinking of migration from on-site controllers (3) and 1 flexconnect into 1 dedicated flex-connect controller (9800L) for all of them (around 220 ap) as authentication is hosted in central location (ISE) and from QoS point of view i should trust marking from end users.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 19:05:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sys_gorski_1983</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-05T19:05:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Flexconnect features limitation versus local mode</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/flexconnect-features-limitation-versus-local-mode/m-p/4092055#M198780</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;trying to find difference in available features on 9800l wlc for ap [from 3700 to 9130]/ssid deployed in flexconnect local switching mode versus local mode. Checking feature matrix (&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/technotes/8-8/b_flexConnect_feature_matrix.html" target="_self"&gt;9800 FlexConnect Feature matrix)&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;but i do not see major differences between modes.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i'm thinking of migration from on-site controllers (3) and 1 flexconnect into 1 dedicated flex-connect controller (9800L) for all of them (around 220 ap) as authentication is hosted in central location (ISE) and from QoS point of view i should trust marking from end users.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 19:05:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/flexconnect-features-limitation-versus-local-mode/m-p/4092055#M198780</guid>
      <dc:creator>sys_gorski_1983</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T19:05:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Flexconnect features limitation versus local mode</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/flexconnect-features-limitation-versus-local-mode/m-p/4092202#M198781</link>
      <description>There isn’t much difference at all between AireOs and IOS-XE.  I think it really comes down to how you migrate and making sue that your testing validates your new design and requirements and then determining your migration process.  I will be migrating from local site controllers running AireOs to 9800’s in Flex, just to reduce the complexity and management.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2020 14:58:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/flexconnect-features-limitation-versus-local-mode/m-p/4092202#M198781</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-26T14:58:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

