<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Minimum RSSI for Data WLAN in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/minimum-rssi-for-data-wlan/m-p/4024613#M200422</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/235145"&gt;@CiscoJon&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I don´t think the recommendation has changed, I believed the documents is talking about a good practice, because if your haves these values (-67dbm, 25SNR, 20% for overlap) you network will be ready to offer a good service, I mean, If is ready for voice, for sure will be ready for data.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;books for exam still talking about&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; (-67dbm, 25SNR, 20% for overlap)&amp;nbsp; for voice services.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Espero que la información haya sido útil y si no tienes más preguntas recuerda cerrar el topic, seleccionando la respuesta como "Respuesta correcta"&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="lia-align-center"&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier" size="2"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;**Please rate the answer if this information was useful***&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="lia-align-center"&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier" size="2"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;**Por favor si la información fue util marca esta respuesta como correcta**&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="lia-align-center"&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier" size="2"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;*Tu reconocimiento nos alienta a seguir participando en los foros *&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 02:46:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Daniel Ordóñez Flores</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-06T02:46:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Minimum RSSI for Data WLAN</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/minimum-rssi-for-data-wlan/m-p/4024607#M200421</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I noticed on Cisco live material (link below) it recommends -67 dBm RSSI is minimum for a WLAN.&amp;nbsp; I know it was always -80 dBm for a data and -67 dBm for voice WLAN from various Cisco books and course materials but has this recommendation changed now?&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.ciscolive.com/c/dam/r/ciscolive/emea/docs/2018/pdf/BRKEWN-2019.pdf" target="_self"&gt;https://www.ciscolive.com/c/dam/r/ciscolive/emea/docs/2018/pdf/BRKEWN-2019.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For the purposes of Cisco exams is it still -80 dBm?&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 18:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/minimum-rssi-for-data-wlan/m-p/4024607#M200421</guid>
      <dc:creator>CiscoJon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T18:39:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Minimum RSSI for Data WLAN</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/minimum-rssi-for-data-wlan/m-p/4024613#M200422</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/235145"&gt;@CiscoJon&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I don´t think the recommendation has changed, I believed the documents is talking about a good practice, because if your haves these values (-67dbm, 25SNR, 20% for overlap) you network will be ready to offer a good service, I mean, If is ready for voice, for sure will be ready for data.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;books for exam still talking about&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; (-67dbm, 25SNR, 20% for overlap)&amp;nbsp; for voice services.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Espero que la información haya sido útil y si no tienes más preguntas recuerda cerrar el topic, seleccionando la respuesta como "Respuesta correcta"&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="lia-align-center"&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier" size="2"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;**Please rate the answer if this information was useful***&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="lia-align-center"&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier" size="2"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;**Por favor si la información fue util marca esta respuesta como correcta**&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="lia-align-center"&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier" size="2"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;*Tu reconocimiento nos alienta a seguir participando en los foros *&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 02:46:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/minimum-rssi-for-data-wlan/m-p/4024613#M200422</guid>
      <dc:creator>Daniel Ordóñez Flores</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-06T02:46:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Minimum RSSI for Data WLAN</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/minimum-rssi-for-data-wlan/m-p/4024794#M200423</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Right, when they talk about VOICE they always specify -67 dBm minimum RSSI but they used to recommend a lower minimum for data of -80 dBm for a data only WLAN.&amp;nbsp; Is the minimum for all types (data, voice, high density and location) now -67 dBm RSSI?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 09:49:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/minimum-rssi-for-data-wlan/m-p/4024794#M200423</guid>
      <dc:creator>CiscoJon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-06T09:49:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Minimum RSSI for Data WLAN</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/minimum-rssi-for-data-wlan/m-p/4025033#M200424</link>
      <description>Today many people tend to use video and audio conferencing on their notebooks, or even calling with WhatsApp. For those cases a good wireless signal is to be preferred. Also most much faster speeds from recent standards can only be reached with a strong signal. Roaming also works much better with enough overlap at a medium signal strength.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 15:44:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/minimum-rssi-for-data-wlan/m-p/4025033#M200424</guid>
      <dc:creator>patoberli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-06T15:44:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

