<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: AP coverage in WLC in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-coverage-in-wlc/m-p/3989108#M201499</link>
    <description>I agree… leave it alone unless you know the impact of the changes you will be doing.  Wireless is over the air, you can’t tell the system not to provide coverage in an area where the rf is available.  Like Marce mentioned, you can tweak the TPC for the AP’s but you better make sure that you don’t introduce any coverage holes in your environment.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 18:19:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-11-25T18:19:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>AP coverage in WLC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-coverage-in-wlc/m-p/3988931#M201497</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Good afternoon;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;They have some experience in being able to configure the frequency coverage in the AP cisco, I have a WLC where I administer, the ground floor I can see that the coverage is very wide and from the exit to the street you can see the ssid;&lt;BR /&gt;I would like to regulate the coverage in the APs.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 18:21:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-coverage-in-wlc/m-p/3988931#M201497</guid>
      <dc:creator>Francho02</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T18:21:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AP coverage in WLC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-coverage-in-wlc/m-p/3988978#M201498</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;- You could configure manual TPC, but by default it's auiomatic together with DCA. My advise is not to be bothered too much with such issues, especially if your intended Intranet-clients require authentication to use the &lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;particular SSID.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;M.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 15:36:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-coverage-in-wlc/m-p/3988978#M201498</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark Elsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-25T15:36:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AP coverage in WLC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-coverage-in-wlc/m-p/3989108#M201499</link>
      <description>I agree… leave it alone unless you know the impact of the changes you will be doing.  Wireless is over the air, you can’t tell the system not to provide coverage in an area where the rf is available.  Like Marce mentioned, you can tweak the TPC for the AP’s but you better make sure that you don’t introduce any coverage holes in your environment.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 18:19:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-coverage-in-wlc/m-p/3989108#M201499</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-25T18:19:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

