<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Cisco WLC LAG in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-wlc-lag/m-p/3923992#M202765</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;yes that is normal that what we see when we configured WLC 8K&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;glad it hel, and can we can make it as resoved.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:21:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-09-13T15:21:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco WLC LAG</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-wlc-lag/m-p/3921071#M202752</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello all&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we have CIsc 5520 in LAG mode on the controller - does it need port-channelling on the switch end? it goes to two different switches but the switches are in VSS mode (Cisco6800)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 17:58:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-wlc-lag/m-p/3921071#M202752</guid>
      <dc:creator>NetworkGuy!</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T17:58:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco WLC LAG</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-wlc-lag/m-p/3921083#M202753</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;yes for high availability user port-channel, use different physical switch port in each physical switch (when VSS switch over occurs) you still have access.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2019 11:32:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-wlc-lag/m-p/3921083#M202753</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-09T11:32:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco WLC LAG</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-wlc-lag/m-p/3921115#M202754</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;Actually, Port-channel is not required. Port-channel is a feature if you, eventually,&amp;nbsp; needs more throughput in a given uplink. Instead 1 Giga or 10 Giga you can bound multiple interfaces and rise this number to up to&amp;nbsp; 8 Giga or 80 Giga.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;What is required on this case it interface in trunk mode so that you can split your traffic accordingly based on Vlans.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-If I helped you somehow, please, rate it as useful.-&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2019 12:44:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-wlc-lag/m-p/3921115#M202754</guid>
      <dc:creator>Flavio Miranda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-09T12:44:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco WLC LAG</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-wlc-lag/m-p/3921125#M202755</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks both&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in the past i dont remember port-channeling so is this required or not?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no concern about bandwidth but just not sure if this is needed or not? because we see laptops flapping on logs on the core switch between one access point another?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2019 13:01:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-wlc-lag/m-p/3921125#M202755</guid>
      <dc:creator>NetworkGuy!</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-09T13:01:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco WLC LAG</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-wlc-lag/m-p/3921145#M202756</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As I said, port-channel is required only if you need more bandwidth. What is required for your scenario is trunk mode on the interface and/or port-channel.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-If I helped you somehow, please, rate it as useful.-&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2019 13:45:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-wlc-lag/m-p/3921145#M202756</guid>
      <dc:creator>Flavio Miranda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-09T13:45:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco WLC LAG</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-wlc-lag/m-p/3921215#M202757</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;we are seeing flapping messages&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;28275320: Sep 9 17:21:28.132 GMT: %MAC_MOVE-SW1-4-NOTIF: Host&amp;nbsp;d4e2.8011.af59&amp;nbsp; in vlan 10 is flapping between port Te1/1/17 and port Te2/1/17&lt;BR /&gt;28275356: Sep 9 17:26:40.374 GMT: %MAC_MOVE-SW1-4-NOTIF: Host d4e2.8011.af59 in vlan 10 is flapping between port Te1/1/17 and port Te2/1/17&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Te1/1/17 is connected to WLC port 1 and Te2/1/17 is connected to WLC port 2 and in LAG mode&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so does this need port-channeling in core switch? hence the question&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2019 15:42:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-wlc-lag/m-p/3921215#M202757</guid>
      <dc:creator>NetworkGuy!</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-09T15:42:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco WLC LAG</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-wlc-lag/m-p/3921255#M202758</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We see the messages are normal as per my experience. until you see any issue here ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2019 16:49:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-wlc-lag/m-p/3921255#M202758</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-09T16:49:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco WLC LAG</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-wlc-lag/m-p/3921406#M202759</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks but why would these messages appear?&amp;nbsp; if i port channel will these messages go away?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2019 21:47:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-wlc-lag/m-p/3921406#M202759</guid>
      <dc:creator>NetworkGuy!</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-09T21:47:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco WLC LAG</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-wlc-lag/m-p/3921436#M202760</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;"&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;we have CIsc 5520 in LAG mode on the controller&amp;nbsp;"&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you have LAG on WLC, then it is mandatory to use port channel config on your switch. Then those messages will go away&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Rasika&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*** Pls rate all useful responses ***&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2019 00:02:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-wlc-lag/m-p/3921436#M202760</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rasika Nayanajith</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-10T00:02:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco WLC LAG</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-wlc-lag/m-p/3921446#M202761</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/324872"&gt;@Rasika Nayanajith&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;just want to know is the same case with 8K controllers ? can you point me, i do see that messages, when the client roaming ..not found that tip before. like to explore me to fix that.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2019 00:47:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-wlc-lag/m-p/3921446#M202761</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-10T00:47:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco WLC LAG</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-wlc-lag/m-p/3921514#M202762</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;when you enable LAG on a WLC (any hardware model) &amp;amp; two ports of WLC connect to two different switchports (on a VSS pair or switch stack), you should bundle those ports into a port channel group at the switch end.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Those mac flapping messages should not be occur in that situation&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Rasika&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2019 03:38:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-wlc-lag/m-p/3921514#M202762</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rasika Nayanajith</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-10T03:38:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco WLC LAG</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-wlc-lag/m-p/3921586#M202763</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;yes the ports are bundled, and we can see its bundled on switch side.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;do we see any other config required on WLC side, as you mentioning on this post...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;we see mac flapping while client roam doing.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2019 07:44:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-wlc-lag/m-p/3921586#M202763</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-10T07:44:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco WLC LAG</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-wlc-lag/m-p/3923157#M202764</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you all&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Enabling LAG helped mac flapping from one interface to another however we do see mac address notification on switch when client roams from AP to AP which is normal i guess&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;just which level of notification on switch logging will make these messages dissappear?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 10:36:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-wlc-lag/m-p/3923157#M202764</guid>
      <dc:creator>NetworkGuy!</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-12T10:36:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco WLC LAG</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-wlc-lag/m-p/3923992#M202765</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;yes that is normal that what we see when we configured WLC 8K&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;glad it hel, and can we can make it as resoved.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:21:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-wlc-lag/m-p/3923992#M202765</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-13T15:21:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

