<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 2802i and SG350 PoE Question in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/2802i-and-sg350-poe-question/m-p/3697994#M207221</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The access point will power up and boot using only a small amount of PoE power, but unless it can get at least 26 watts, both of it's radios will be disabled. You'll see the light cycles through red/green/blue over and over when the radios are disabled. You wouldnt be able to tell this from the swtich side, youd need to look on your controller.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also, you can "Work around" that bug by setting logging level to 3. It doesnt stop it, but at least covers up the cosmetic issue.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 14:59:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>KYLE MCLERREN</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-08-30T14:59:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>2802i and SG350 PoE Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/2802i-and-sg350-poe-question/m-p/3697885#M207219</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello WLAN experts,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;recently we connected several 2802 WLAN APs&amp;nbsp; to a small Cisco Office Switch for testing PoE.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The small Cisco SG350 is offering 62 Watt PoE in total supporting 802.3af/at acc. to datasheet.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The datasheet for a 2802 WLAN AP &amp;nbsp;states 26 Watt with all features enabled except USB 2.0.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;To my surprise, we could connect&amp;nbsp;even 4 2802 APs &amp;nbsp;to this small Switch.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Show power Inline on the Switch shows only 9.9 Watt and Class 4 for each of them.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I guess we would have been bale to connect even more. But I had only for of them.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;At first glance I did not notice any problem with this setup.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Does somebody know, which functions will not work on a 2802 with only 9,9 Watt instead&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;of supporting it with the officially annonced PoE+ with 26 Watt ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank You in advance&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Wini&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;P.S. we are running on 8.3.141 which show a nasty Full7Half-Duplex bug with 2802 APs.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 16:04:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/2802i-and-sg350-poe-question/m-p/3697885#M207219</guid>
      <dc:creator>derobbacher</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T16:04:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2802i and SG350 PoE Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/2802i-and-sg350-poe-question/m-p/3697972#M207220</link>
      <description>I'm pretty sure that's a fault on the switch. The 2802, with the radios working, requires 26.1 Watts:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Module   Available     Used     Remaining&lt;BR /&gt;          (Watts)     (Watts)    (Watts) &lt;BR /&gt;------   ---------   --------   ---------&lt;BR /&gt;1           740.0      413.2       326.8&lt;BR /&gt;Interface Admin  Oper       Power   Device              Class Max&lt;BR /&gt;                            (Watts)                            &lt;BR /&gt;..........&lt;BR /&gt;Gi1/0/47  auto   on         26.1    AIR-AP2802I-E-K9    4     30.0 &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It is possible that yours has the radios disabled, because it's not getting enough power. In that case it's maybe happy with 9.9 W.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 14:35:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/2802i-and-sg350-poe-question/m-p/3697972#M207220</guid>
      <dc:creator>patoberli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-30T14:35:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2802i and SG350 PoE Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/2802i-and-sg350-poe-question/m-p/3697994#M207221</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The access point will power up and boot using only a small amount of PoE power, but unless it can get at least 26 watts, both of it's radios will be disabled. You'll see the light cycles through red/green/blue over and over when the radios are disabled. You wouldnt be able to tell this from the swtich side, youd need to look on your controller.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also, you can "Work around" that bug by setting logging level to 3. It doesnt stop it, but at least covers up the cosmetic issue.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 14:59:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/2802i-and-sg350-poe-question/m-p/3697994#M207221</guid>
      <dc:creator>KYLE MCLERREN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-30T14:59:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2802i and SG350 PoE Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/2802i-and-sg350-poe-question/m-p/3698482#M207222</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Kyle,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;thank You very much for Your proposal to change Log-Level to avoid the&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Full/Half-Duplex-Bug-Messages in the switch, when 2802i are connected.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Do You have some more detail info please on how this can be changed ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank You very much&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Wini&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 06:50:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/2802i-and-sg350-poe-question/m-p/3698482#M207222</guid>
      <dc:creator>derobbacher</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-31T06:50:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2802i and SG350 PoE Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/2802i-and-sg350-poe-question/m-p/3698594#M207223</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;All 4 2802 are running with 9.9 Watt with all antennas active.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Greetings&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Wini&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 10:18:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/2802i-and-sg350-poe-question/m-p/3698594#M207223</guid>
      <dc:creator>derobbacher</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-31T10:18:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2802i and SG350 PoE Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/2802i-and-sg350-poe-question/m-p/3698720#M207224</link>
      <description>In that case it must be a visual error, because the AP clearly requires &amp;gt; 20 W to run correctly.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 13:16:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/2802i-and-sg350-poe-question/m-p/3698720#M207224</guid>
      <dc:creator>patoberli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-31T13:16:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

