<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic They dont really have any. in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-equivalent-of-the-ubiquiti-nanostation-m5/m-p/3018787#M208189</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;They dont really have any.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Way back i did some Point to Point setups using 1252 (yes that old brick) and directional antennas. It works fine, but no real equivalent.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There was also a 13xx series that could to point to point.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Today you might be able to use some 15xx for the same problem.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;PS:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Once WAAYYY back I think Cisco bought a company named "Xalt" or something like that.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That equipment could to many cool things, but the price was somewhat high when comparing to Ubnt.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;/Thomas&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2017 19:06:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Thomas Obbekaer Thomsen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-05-01T19:06:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco Equivalent of the Ubiquiti Nanostation M5</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-equivalent-of-the-ubiquiti-nanostation-m5/m-p/3018786#M208188</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What is the Cisco product equivalent of the&amp;nbsp;Ubiquiti Nanostation M5?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 13:57:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-equivalent-of-the-ubiquiti-nanostation-m5/m-p/3018786#M208188</guid>
      <dc:creator>bmitchell69</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T13:57:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>They dont really have any.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-equivalent-of-the-ubiquiti-nanostation-m5/m-p/3018787#M208189</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;They dont really have any.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Way back i did some Point to Point setups using 1252 (yes that old brick) and directional antennas. It works fine, but no real equivalent.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There was also a 13xx series that could to point to point.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Today you might be able to use some 15xx for the same problem.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;PS:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Once WAAYYY back I think Cisco bought a company named "Xalt" or something like that.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That equipment could to many cool things, but the price was somewhat high when comparing to Ubnt.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;/Thomas&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2017 19:06:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-equivalent-of-the-ubiquiti-nanostation-m5/m-p/3018787#M208189</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thomas Obbekaer Thomsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-01T19:06:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Exalt is the company Cisco</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-equivalent-of-the-ubiquiti-nanostation-m5/m-p/3018788#M208190</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Exalt is the company Cisco resold P2P bridges. ubiquity is a very low cost option that you will not find in Cisco/Exalt and or really other manufacturers like Bridgewave, Proxim, and Motorola for example.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-Scott&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*** Please rate helpful posts ***&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2017 19:24:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-equivalent-of-the-ubiquiti-nanostation-m5/m-p/3018788#M208190</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-01T19:24:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

