<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Yes, you can. in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/compatibilty-between-mc-and-ma-of-3850-switches/m-p/3063285#M208306</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, you can.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But always recommend to run same code across MAs &amp;amp; MC as a best practice.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Rasika&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*** Pls rate all useful responses ***&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2017 17:00:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rasika Nayanajith</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-02-27T17:00:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Compatibilty between MC and MA of 3850 switches</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/compatibilty-between-mc-and-ma-of-3850-switches/m-p/3063284#M208305</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Experts,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can we have MC's and MA's of different version in 3850 switch model? Currently all of our MA &amp;amp; MC's are in 3.6.3e version , we want to perform upgrade to 3.6.6e in one of our MA and see the performance of the AP's associated with that IDF.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please provide your thought on this.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Tamil&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 13:37:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/compatibilty-between-mc-and-ma-of-3850-switches/m-p/3063284#M208305</guid>
      <dc:creator>Selva</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T13:37:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yes, you can.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/compatibilty-between-mc-and-ma-of-3850-switches/m-p/3063285#M208306</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, you can.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But always recommend to run same code across MAs &amp;amp; MC as a best practice.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Rasika&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*** Pls rate all useful responses ***&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2017 17:00:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/compatibilty-between-mc-and-ma-of-3850-switches/m-p/3063285#M208306</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rasika Nayanajith</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-27T17:00:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks for the quick reply ,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/compatibilty-between-mc-and-ma-of-3850-switches/m-p/3063286#M208307</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the quick reply , Do you have any document for the compatibilty or check list for building up this architecture?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2017 17:08:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/compatibilty-between-mc-and-ma-of-3850-switches/m-p/3063286#M208307</guid>
      <dc:creator>Selva</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-27T17:08:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Please refer to the release</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/compatibilty-between-mc-and-ma-of-3850-switches/m-p/3063287#M208308</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Please refer to the release notes:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3850/software/release/3e/release_notes/OL3262101.html#pgfId-919359&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 07:34:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/compatibilty-between-mc-and-ma-of-3850-switches/m-p/3063287#M208308</guid>
      <dc:creator>Yashas Bhadoria</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-28T07:34:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

