<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Any model of APs can support in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/2600-optimized-for-byod/m-p/2496938#M209685</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Any model of APs can support BYOD. &amp;nbsp;APs don't understand BYOD. &amp;nbsp;It's the backend, such as RADIUS/TACACs, web authentication, etc. &amp;nbsp;These are the ones that support BYOD or not. &amp;nbsp;APs play a part of or are a link to BYOD. &amp;nbsp;This is why it's mentioned in the Data Sheet.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 23:45:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-05-30T23:45:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>2600 optimized for BYOD?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/2600-optimized-for-byod/m-p/2496937#M209684</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Spec says that 2600 series access-points are BYOD optimized. We are using 1600 for BYOD. I dont see any issue in the BYOD network. Anyone knows what additional features that 2600 got in BYOD support.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ramesh&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 07:55:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/2600-optimized-for-byod/m-p/2496937#M209684</guid>
      <dc:creator>ramesh rajendran</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T07:55:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Any model of APs can support</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/2600-optimized-for-byod/m-p/2496938#M209685</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Any model of APs can support BYOD. &amp;nbsp;APs don't understand BYOD. &amp;nbsp;It's the backend, such as RADIUS/TACACs, web authentication, etc. &amp;nbsp;These are the ones that support BYOD or not. &amp;nbsp;APs play a part of or are a link to BYOD. &amp;nbsp;This is why it's mentioned in the Data Sheet.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 23:45:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/2600-optimized-for-byod/m-p/2496938#M209685</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-30T23:45:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi,Both of model support</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/2600-optimized-for-byod/m-p/2496939#M209686</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size:14px;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: times new roman,times,serif;"&gt;Hi,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size:14px;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: times new roman,times,serif;"&gt;Both of model support BYOD&lt;BR /&gt;the only difference is that Aironet 2600 Series access point is packed with more Bring Your Own Device (BYOD)-enhancing functionality&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;The new Cisco Aironet 2600 Series sustains reliable connections at higher speeds farther from the access point than competing solutions resulting in more availability of 450-Mbps data rates.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Optimized for consumer devices, the Aironet 2600 Series accelerates client connections and consumes less mobile device battery power than competing solutions.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2014 23:00:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/2600-optimized-for-byod/m-p/2496939#M209686</guid>
      <dc:creator>abwahid</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-06-04T23:00:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Both the AP's support BYOD.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/2600-optimized-for-byod/m-p/2496940#M209687</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Both the AP's support BYOD. The only enhancement in 2600 is that&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It has features as-&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Any Device/BYOD Optimized&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Client Scalability&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;RF Interference Mitigation&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2014 02:31:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/2600-optimized-for-byod/m-p/2496940#M209687</guid>
      <dc:creator>Abhishek Abhishek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-21T02:31:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Have a look into the BYOD</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/2600-optimized-for-byod/m-p/2496941#M209688</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Have a look into the BYOD components&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/solutions/Enterprise/Borderless_Networks/Unified_Access/BYOD_Design_Guide/BYOD_Components.html#pgfId-1019065&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2014 23:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/2600-optimized-for-byod/m-p/2496941#M209688</guid>
      <dc:creator>Saurav Lodh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-23T23:48:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

