<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Load balancing issues? in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/load-balancing-issues/m-p/2284248#M210469</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I guess per radio per AP client count is more in your case, clients more than the threshold are being shown busy status ( code 17 ) by AP. Therefore, clients are unable to associate to that AP. When the number of retries are over , they are denied. I guess there are network holes as well ( no coverage b/w the cells of differenet APs ). You can increase the window count , however, it depends on the AP model finally ( max. no. of&amp;nbsp; clients associated ).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2013 09:55:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Saurav Lodh</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-09-20T09:55:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Load balancing issues?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/load-balancing-issues/m-p/2284247#M210468</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Could someone help me with load balancing, current stats:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.cisco.com/legacyfs/online/legacy/3/3/5/157533-Untitled.png" alt="Untitled.png" class="jive-image-thumbnail jive-image" width="450" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a limited understanding, but from what I can make out, we have a significant number of clients being denied association and load balancing to different AP's but then the candidate count suggests a significant number of clients that failed to load balance, presumably because there wasnt an AP available in range that wasn't busy?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Uptime is 27 days, client count can reach around 220 at busy times, 63 AP's in the building 1142's, 5508 controller. I am wondering if increasing the window size would offer a more robust solution, or will this just degrade user experience further?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am having a number of issues with failed client association now, and devices just not being able to operate wirelessly at all&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Client count reaching 25 on some AP's&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 07:53:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/load-balancing-issues/m-p/2284247#M210468</guid>
      <dc:creator>cogrady84</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T07:53:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Load balancing issues?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/load-balancing-issues/m-p/2284248#M210469</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I guess per radio per AP client count is more in your case, clients more than the threshold are being shown busy status ( code 17 ) by AP. Therefore, clients are unable to associate to that AP. When the number of retries are over , they are denied. I guess there are network holes as well ( no coverage b/w the cells of differenet APs ). You can increase the window count , however, it depends on the AP model finally ( max. no. of&amp;nbsp; clients associated ).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2013 09:55:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/load-balancing-issues/m-p/2284248#M210469</guid>
      <dc:creator>Saurav Lodh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-20T09:55:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

