<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: WLAN Performance in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlan-performance/m-p/1515221#M212799</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You would do testing as you would do on the wired side.&amp;nbsp; I don't know how you will see a breaking point... wireless is half duplex so the more traffic on that AP, the more others might see an issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 02:47:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-10-28T02:47:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>WLAN Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlan-performance/m-p/1515220#M212798</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could some please let me know whether there is a&amp;nbsp; tool that could be utilized to put a WLAN under stress to identify its breaking point?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Specifically on&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;H-REAP APs and impact on the northbound switch, router performances and WAN link utilization.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Requesting&amp;nbsp; 20-30 people to hammer the WLAN with their laptops&amp;nbsp; is another option&amp;nbsp; but it is not feasible at this stage &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.cisco.com/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Janesh&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 02:20:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlan-performance/m-p/1515220#M212798</guid>
      <dc:creator>janesh_abey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T02:20:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WLAN Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlan-performance/m-p/1515221#M212799</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You would do testing as you would do on the wired side.&amp;nbsp; I don't know how you will see a breaking point... wireless is half duplex so the more traffic on that AP, the more others might see an issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 02:47:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlan-performance/m-p/1515221#M212799</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-28T02:47:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WLAN Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlan-performance/m-p/1515222#M212800</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Scott,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply.I was under the impression that there could be tools specifically to impact 802.11 side of things.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With wired, I use iperf but looking for&amp;nbsp; something&amp;nbsp; better than that &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.cisco.com/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Janesh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 05:47:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlan-performance/m-p/1515222#M212800</guid>
      <dc:creator>janesh_abey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-28T05:47:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WLAN Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlan-performance/m-p/1515223#M212801</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Well... there are tools like SolarWinds that has tools to "hammer" the network, but its not free.&amp;nbsp; If you have a throughput requirement, you can always upload large video via ftp, etc with multiple devices and see when it starts affecting your throughput requirements.&amp;nbsp; I've had 4 devices uploading large 4gb video and it took over 30 minutes on a 1252AP.&amp;nbsp; That was in the requirements of the client and that was fine.&amp;nbsp; Adding one more deivce to the wireless failed the requirement testing.&amp;nbsp; You can probably find tools out there, but not for free.&amp;nbsp; There are also hardware devices to test throughput, but they are not cheap.&amp;nbsp; Look at how much you are oversubscribing with AP and the switchport.&amp;nbsp; I think that you will have poor performance, before you can break it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:00:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlan-performance/m-p/1515223#M212801</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-28T14:00:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WLAN Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlan-performance/m-p/1515224#M212802</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Scott,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for replying to my query.Really appreciate it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Janesh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:02:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlan-performance/m-p/1515224#M212802</guid>
      <dc:creator>janesh_abey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-29T02:02:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WLAN Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlan-performance/m-p/1515225#M212803</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your breaking point will be the 802.11 medium, without question. As you add more and more devices your channel activity increases. So even if you have 1 device throwing the kitchen sink at your access point you really dont get the full impact. As mentioned you need to add the clients. Ive had the luck a few times recently to test phones and laptops on a large scale. I worked with our desktop folks who were imaging new devices for a refresh, I asked to borrow a number of them for a few hours. I also recently rolled out 500 phones and while staging them we took a few hours to play. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have you seen the cisco client density video ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.my80211.com/cisco-wlan-videos/"&gt;http://www.my80211.com/cisco-wlan-videos/&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 06:40:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlan-performance/m-p/1515225#M212803</guid>
      <dc:creator>George Stefanick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-29T06:40:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

