<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic What does Load threshold violation reported by '802.11b/g' mean? in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/what-does-load-threshold-violation-reported-by-802-11b-g-mean/m-p/1483345#M212895</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I am assuming it is too many laptops on an access point. This environment has 24 laptops on a cart used in 1 room so shouldn't the controler divy them up between the 2 antennas&amp;nbsp; in the 1142 which is sitting right above them?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gary&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 01:50:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>william.hostetler</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-04T01:50:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>What does Load threshold violation reported by '802.11b/g' mean?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/what-does-load-threshold-violation-reported-by-802-11b-g-mean/m-p/1483345#M212895</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am assuming it is too many laptops on an access point. This environment has 24 laptops on a cart used in 1 room so shouldn't the controler divy them up between the 2 antennas&amp;nbsp; in the 1142 which is sitting right above them?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gary&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 01:50:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/what-does-load-threshold-violation-reported-by-802-11b-g-mean/m-p/1483345#M212895</guid>
      <dc:creator>william.hostetler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T01:50:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What does Load threshold violation reported by '802.11b/g' m</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/what-does-load-threshold-violation-reported-by-802-11b-g-mean/m-p/1483346#M212896</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The AP doesn't work like that.&amp;nbsp; The antennaes work in "diversity" mode.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 01:25:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/what-does-load-threshold-violation-reported-by-802-11b-g-mean/m-p/1483346#M212896</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-29T01:25:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What does Load threshold violation reported by '802.11b/g' m</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/what-does-load-threshold-violation-reported-by-802-11b-g-mean/m-p/1483347#M212897</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Gary,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just to add a note here to the good info from my friend Leo (+5 ponts L-Man)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You are most correct about the nature of this alarm;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WCS Message AP ''{0}'', interface ''{1}." Load threshold violated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Symptoms A radio interface of an access point is reporting that the client load has&lt;BR /&gt;crossed a configured threshold.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;WCS Severity Minor.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Probable Causes There are too many clients associated with this radio interface.&lt;BR /&gt;Recommended Actions Verify the client count on this radio interface. If the threshold for this&lt;BR /&gt;trap is too low, you may need to readjust it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Add new capacity to the physical location if the client count is a frequent&lt;BR /&gt;issue on this radio.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As Leo noted, the dual antennas in "Diversity" mode won't help to mitigate&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;this issue. Only adding another AP can help load balance the client load &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.cisco.com/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rob&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please support CSC Helps Haiti&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-wiki-small" href="https://community.cisco.com/docs/DOC-8895"&gt;https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-8895&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-wiki-small" href="https://community.cisco.com/docs/DOC-8727"&gt;https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-8727&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 13:35:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/what-does-load-threshold-violation-reported-by-802-11b-g-mean/m-p/1483347#M212897</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Huffman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-29T13:35:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What does Load threshold violation reported by '802.11b/g' m</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/what-does-load-threshold-violation-reported-by-802-11b-g-mean/m-p/1483348#M212898</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;That room is an island in that it is surrounded by double block hallways etc.&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt; The 24 laptops have N in them but the AP is the 1131. I have 1142s in most of the rest of the building and they are the more expensive N variety. Would using that type of AP be better than the 1131? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;Gary&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 14:44:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/what-does-load-threshold-violation-reported-by-802-11b-g-mean/m-p/1483348#M212898</guid>
      <dc:creator>william.hostetler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-29T14:44:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What does Load threshold violation reported by '802.11b/g' m</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/what-does-load-threshold-violation-reported-by-802-11b-g-mean/m-p/1483349#M212899</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Gary,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think the user experience would improve greatly if&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;you deployed the 1140 series AP &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.cisco.com/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With the greater bandwidth available with "N" 24 users&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;wouldn't be as problematic.You may still get the alarm&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;depending on the threshold you have set.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rob&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 14:58:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/what-does-load-threshold-violation-reported-by-802-11b-g-mean/m-p/1483349#M212899</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Huffman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-29T14:58:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What does Load threshold violation reported by '802.11b/g' m</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/what-does-load-threshold-violation-reported-by-802-11b-g-mean/m-p/1483350#M212900</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Rob,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That was what I figured. We had about 40 1131s from previous installs but the rest of the 170 APs are the 1142s. I may just swap out and put in 1142s for any classrooms that frequently use 24 laptops. Of course they are not cheap by all means.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gary&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 15:03:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/what-does-load-threshold-violation-reported-by-802-11b-g-mean/m-p/1483350#M212900</guid>
      <dc:creator>william.hostetler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-29T15:03:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What does Load threshold violation reported by '802.11b/g' m</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/what-does-load-threshold-violation-reported-by-802-11b-g-mean/m-p/1483351#M212901</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Gary,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hear you man &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.cisco.com/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are replacing all of our current 1130, 1240 series AP's on our&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Campus now as the number of student/staff/faculty laptops increases. The first&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;area we are converting is our Library which frequently sees the same&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;issues as your classroom example. In our testing the conversion to&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"N" standard AP's makes a considerable difference like you nicely noted.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rob&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 15:14:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/what-does-load-threshold-violation-reported-by-802-11b-g-mean/m-p/1483351#M212901</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Huffman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-29T15:14:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

