<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: CKIP and other cipher options. in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ckip-and-other-cipher-options/m-p/904245#M213538</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CKIP is a Cisco version of TKIP.  I believe CKIP was released just before TKIP, but it was released for the same reasons, ie, better than WEP, but still based on RC4.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyway, I'd suggest that TKIP, or even better, AES is used to encrypt your link.  Using TKIP and/or AES will require the use of WPA / WPA2, which can be configured to use static keys, or dynamic keys via RADIUS authentication.  If you don't have a RADIUS server, you can configure a RADIUS service on your Root AP without too much hassle.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Richard&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 01:21:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Richard Atkin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-12-15T01:21:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CKIP and other cipher options.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ckip-and-other-cipher-options/m-p/904244#M213537</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi - I'm installing 1310 bridges for the first time.  I've seen Release Notes that state CKIP is the recommended option for encrypting traffic between the two bridges.  I have many other options in that field - tkip, tkip+128bit wep, etc.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it the consensus of this forum that CKIP should be used?  Can someone explain to me why I would choose any of the other options?  And if I set the cipher, do I need to use WPA for any reason in a point to point only scenario?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any advice would be appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you - &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 22:06:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ckip-and-other-cipher-options/m-p/904244#M213537</guid>
      <dc:creator>bdunsing2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-03T22:06:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CKIP and other cipher options.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ckip-and-other-cipher-options/m-p/904245#M213538</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CKIP is a Cisco version of TKIP.  I believe CKIP was released just before TKIP, but it was released for the same reasons, ie, better than WEP, but still based on RC4.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyway, I'd suggest that TKIP, or even better, AES is used to encrypt your link.  Using TKIP and/or AES will require the use of WPA / WPA2, which can be configured to use static keys, or dynamic keys via RADIUS authentication.  If you don't have a RADIUS server, you can configure a RADIUS service on your Root AP without too much hassle.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Richard&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 01:21:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ckip-and-other-cipher-options/m-p/904245#M213538</guid>
      <dc:creator>Richard Atkin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-15T01:21:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CKIP and other cipher options.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ckip-and-other-cipher-options/m-p/904246#M213539</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply.  My wireless bridge is currently using TKIP+128bitWEP, as that is what one "expert" advised.  I select that entry, then type a 128bit hex wep key.  With only that, I'm able to establish an encrypted link between the two APs.  Is this any better than using just WEP? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any Cisco documentation that discusses the function of the encryption tab versus the authentication modes found on the SSID tab? (Hope that made sense!)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 04:33:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ckip-and-other-cipher-options/m-p/904246#M213539</guid>
      <dc:creator>bdunsing2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-15T04:33:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

