<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Enabling Aironet IE worth it? in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/enabling-aironet-ie-worth-it/m-p/1353095#M21362</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I never enable it... back in the autonomous days I did though:_&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks, &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Scott &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Help out other by using the rating system and marking answered questions as "Answered"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 16:50:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-09-09T16:50:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Enabling Aironet IE worth it?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/enabling-aironet-ie-worth-it/m-p/1353092#M21359</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style=": ; font-size: 2; "&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it good practice anymore to enable "Aironet IE" on the WLAN? I'm wondering if the additional information that that is beaconed out (AP hostname, etc) is worth it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 01:22:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/enabling-aironet-ie-worth-it/m-p/1353092#M21359</guid>
      <dc:creator>rsumpter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T01:22:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Enabling Aironet IE worth it?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/enabling-aironet-ie-worth-it/m-p/1353093#M21360</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since most new clients are CCX compliant I don't know if there is much value unless of course there is older clients in your environment. I would like to hear others input on this subject. Recent deployment documents don't state it as a requirement unless you deploy WG bridges.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 05:53:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/enabling-aironet-ie-worth-it/m-p/1353093#M21360</guid>
      <dc:creator>George Stefanick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-23T05:53:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Enabling Aironet IE worth it?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/enabling-aironet-ie-worth-it/m-p/1353094#M21361</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know this is an old post but i actually ran into an problem where having it checked on a WLAN caused an issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I had a Doctor who's IPAD seemed to be dropping off the guest wireless, So i created a test SSID with "aironet" IE turned off and he seems to be working fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 15:11:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/enabling-aironet-ie-worth-it/m-p/1353094#M21361</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven Bryant</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-09T15:11:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Enabling Aironet IE worth it?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/enabling-aironet-ie-worth-it/m-p/1353095#M21362</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I never enable it... back in the autonomous days I did though:_&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks, &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Scott &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Help out other by using the rating system and marking answered questions as "Answered"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 16:50:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/enabling-aironet-ie-worth-it/m-p/1353095#M21362</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-09T16:50:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Enabling Aironet IE worth it?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/enabling-aironet-ie-worth-it/m-p/1353096#M21363</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the insight Scott,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe the only item left in our hospital that would be considered old is an ekg cart with a very old wireless bridge.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So no real benefits having it on it would seem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 19:16:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/enabling-aironet-ie-worth-it/m-p/1353096#M21363</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven Bryant</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-09T19:16:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Enabling Aironet IE worth it?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/enabling-aironet-ie-worth-it/m-p/1353097#M21364</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No not really unless that breaks the connection to that bridge.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks, &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Scott &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Help out other by using the rating system and marking answered questions as "Answered"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 19:17:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/enabling-aironet-ie-worth-it/m-p/1353097#M21364</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-09T19:17:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Enabling Aironet IE worth it?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/enabling-aironet-ie-worth-it/m-p/1353098#M21365</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can i pose another question on this thread though?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 19:22:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/enabling-aironet-ie-worth-it/m-p/1353098#M21365</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven Bryant</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-09T19:22:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Enabling Aironet IE worth it?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/enabling-aironet-ie-worth-it/m-p/1353099#M21366</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Oh don't worry... its just in my signature:)&amp;nbsp; Thanks for rating though:)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks, &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Scott &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Help out other by using the rating system and marking answered questions as "Answered"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 19:24:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/enabling-aironet-ie-worth-it/m-p/1353099#M21366</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-09T19:24:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Enabling Aironet IE worth it?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/enabling-aironet-ie-worth-it/m-p/1353100#M21367</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can, but its best to just open a new post so it doesn't get too confusing with older post, especially if its a different topic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks, &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Scott &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Help out other by using the rating system and marking answered questions as "Answered"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 19:38:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/enabling-aironet-ie-worth-it/m-p/1353100#M21367</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-09T19:38:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

