<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Terms for installed WLAN in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/terms-for-installed-wlan/m-p/667025#M213996</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I recommend using a tool such as AirMagnet Surveyor to map out the coverage.  You can also use a free tool like netstumbler to walk through and spot check coverage, but it is not as accurate.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 15:52:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>shh5455</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-01-04T15:52:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Terms for installed WLAN</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/terms-for-installed-wlan/m-p/667024#M213995</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;how can we evaluate an installed WLAN if is good or bad?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Base is an WLAN within 150 AP (1242 with 1x WLSE) over 4 Locations and approximate 200 Users per Location.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for any Answers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Marco&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 20:26:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/terms-for-installed-wlan/m-p/667024#M213995</guid>
      <dc:creator>struckmeier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-03T20:26:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Terms for installed WLAN</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/terms-for-installed-wlan/m-p/667025#M213996</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I recommend using a tool such as AirMagnet Surveyor to map out the coverage.  You can also use a free tool like netstumbler to walk through and spot check coverage, but it is not as accurate.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 15:52:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/terms-for-installed-wlan/m-p/667025#M213996</guid>
      <dc:creator>shh5455</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-04T15:52:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Terms for installed WLAN</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/terms-for-installed-wlan/m-p/667026#M213997</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello shh5455,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;yes its right. We used Ekahau for messurement. But we locking for similarly as an offical Checklist, to demonstrat our customer, that this installation is right or (unfortunately) bad.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 09:36:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/terms-for-installed-wlan/m-p/667026#M213997</guid>
      <dc:creator>struckmeier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-05T09:36:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Terms for installed WLAN</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/terms-for-installed-wlan/m-p/667027#M213998</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Marco,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Log into the WLSE and review the devices which are reporting to it, ensure all devices are in there. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While the tools mentioned by the gentlemen before me are all well and good it misses the mark a tad. Review if you informed them to do any sort of deployment for Voice. Voice and data requirements are quite different. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;review your 'Faults' in the WLSE, if you see alerts concerning high number of retries (ie 600/700 retries per min) i would bring this to their attention. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Review the documentation that they give you... Did they properly alternate channels? Only channels 1,6,11 do not overlap.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If your buildings are in multiple different states/provinces... You can do a spot check, most adapter client utilies permit you to do a site survey of sorts. The cisco ACU has a nice tool which will allow you to see SNR and signal strength. I have included the minimum signal strength and minimum signal to noise ratios below as posted by Cisco.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Speed...MinSig..MinSNR&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;54......-71.....25&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;36......-73.....18&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;24......-77.....12&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;12/11...-82.....10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;6/5.5...-89.....08&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.......-91.....06&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.......-94.....04&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please remember to rate helpful posts. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:29:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/terms-for-installed-wlan/m-p/667027#M213998</guid>
      <dc:creator>robert.wright</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-10T16:29:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

